Biodiversity and ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment: An evaluation of six Australian cases

被引:12
|
作者
Gutierrez, Marco [1 ]
Bekessy, Sarah A. [1 ]
Gordon, Ascelin [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Interdisciplinary Conservat Sci Res Grp, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Strategic environmental assessment; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Conservation; Urban development; Mitigation hierarchy; Evaluation; Performance; Effectiveness; Environmental impact assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106552
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) aims to provide a sound theoretical basis on which to plan for biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). With the multi-purpose and increasing use of SEA worldwide, it is timely to evaluate the effectiveness of SEA practice in integrating biodiversity and ES considerations. Here, we derive criteria from the International Best Practice Principles on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Impact Assessment to evaluate six Australian SEAs conducted for urban development plans. We use qualitative and quantitative content analysis to examine the endorsed SEA reports. We identify and analyse text references related to the evaluation criteria and use word counting of keywords to supplement and cross-check the validity of our findings. Four significant results emerge from our analysis. First, while goals to achieve no net loss (NNL) or net gain outcomes for biodiversity are mentioned in all case studies, their poor specification may limit their effectiveness. Second, there is limited integration of ES considerations into the SEA reports, limiting the potential advantages that such an approach could provide. Third, offsetting is the most documented type of mitigation measure, potentially signalling a lack of evidence in implementing early steps of the mitigation hierarchy, including avoidance. This could be explained by the low level of integration of biodiversity and ES considerations from the early stages in the planning process, where there is more flexibility to apply such steps. Fourth, biodiversity management systems and follow-up activities lack detailed information to judge whether they will be useful to demonstrate NNL outcomes. Based on these findings, we present recommendations for enhancing the integration of biodiversity and ES considerations in SEAs. Our approach provides a general framework that can be applied to evaluate SEAs elsewhere in the world from a biodiversity and ES conservation perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of the Ecosystem Services Capacity in Natural Protected Areas for Biodiversity Conservation
    Ronchi, Silvia
    Salata, Stefano
    [J]. WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM - WMCAUS, 2017, 245
  • [32] Global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA
    Thomas Koellner
    Roland Geyer
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1185 - 1187
  • [33] Implications of landscape changes for ecosystem services and biodiversity: A national assessment in Ecuador
    Koo, Hongmi
    Kleemann, Janina
    Cuenca, Pablo
    Noh, Jin Kyoung
    Fuerst, Christine
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 69
  • [34] Perspectives on the link between ecosystem services and biodiversity: The assessment of the nursery function
    Liquete, Camino
    Cid, Nuria
    Lanzanova, Denis
    Grizzetti, Bruna
    Reynaud, Arnaud
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 63 : 249 - 257
  • [35] The Challenges of Incorporating Cultural Ecosystem Services into Environmental Assessment
    Debra Satz
    Rachelle K. Gould
    Kai M. A. Chan
    Anne Guerry
    Bryan Norton
    Terre Satterfield
    Benjamin S. Halpern
    Jordan Levine
    Ulalia Woodside
    Neil Hannahs
    Xavier Basurto
    Sarah Klain
    [J]. AMBIO, 2013, 42 : 675 - 684
  • [36] The Challenges of Incorporating Cultural Ecosystem Services into Environmental Assessment
    Satz, Debra
    Gould, Rachelle K.
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Guerry, Anne
    Norton, Bryan
    Satterfield, Terre
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Levine, Jordan
    Woodside, Ulalia
    Hannahs, Neil
    Basurto, Xavier
    Klain, Sarah
    [J]. AMBIO, 2013, 42 (06) : 675 - 684
  • [37] Environmental compensation for biodiversity and ecosystem services: A flexible framework that addresses human wellbeing
    Cole, Scott
    Moksnes, Per-Olav
    Soderqvist, Tore
    Wikstrom, Sofia A.
    Sundblad, Goran
    Hasselstrom, Linus
    Bergstrom, Ulf
    Kraufvelin, Patrik
    Bergstrom, Lena
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 50
  • [38] PRESERVATION AND EVALUATION OF BIODIVERSITY: THE CONCEPT OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF FAUNA
    Cetkovic, Aleksandar
    Stevanovic, Vladimir
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF FAUNA OF SERBIA, 2018, 171 : 17 - 37
  • [39] Strategic environmental assessment in Australian land-use planning
    Marsden, Simon
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING LAW JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (05):
  • [40] REFORMING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prospects for Australian environmental protection following deregulation
    Marsden, Simon
    [J]. ALTERNATIVE LAW JOURNAL, 2013, 38 (03) : 181 - 183