Biodiversity and ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment: An evaluation of six Australian cases

被引:12
|
作者
Gutierrez, Marco [1 ]
Bekessy, Sarah A. [1 ]
Gordon, Ascelin [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Interdisciplinary Conservat Sci Res Grp, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Strategic environmental assessment; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Conservation; Urban development; Mitigation hierarchy; Evaluation; Performance; Effectiveness; Environmental impact assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106552
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) aims to provide a sound theoretical basis on which to plan for biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). With the multi-purpose and increasing use of SEA worldwide, it is timely to evaluate the effectiveness of SEA practice in integrating biodiversity and ES considerations. Here, we derive criteria from the International Best Practice Principles on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Impact Assessment to evaluate six Australian SEAs conducted for urban development plans. We use qualitative and quantitative content analysis to examine the endorsed SEA reports. We identify and analyse text references related to the evaluation criteria and use word counting of keywords to supplement and cross-check the validity of our findings. Four significant results emerge from our analysis. First, while goals to achieve no net loss (NNL) or net gain outcomes for biodiversity are mentioned in all case studies, their poor specification may limit their effectiveness. Second, there is limited integration of ES considerations into the SEA reports, limiting the potential advantages that such an approach could provide. Third, offsetting is the most documented type of mitigation measure, potentially signalling a lack of evidence in implementing early steps of the mitigation hierarchy, including avoidance. This could be explained by the low level of integration of biodiversity and ES considerations from the early stages in the planning process, where there is more flexibility to apply such steps. Fourth, biodiversity management systems and follow-up activities lack detailed information to judge whether they will be useful to demonstrate NNL outcomes. Based on these findings, we present recommendations for enhancing the integration of biodiversity and ES considerations in SEAs. Our approach provides a general framework that can be applied to evaluate SEAs elsewhere in the world from a biodiversity and ES conservation perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Establishment of a comprehensive indicator system for the assessment of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Yu, Dandan
    Lu, Nan
    Fu, Bojie
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2017, 32 (08) : 1563 - 1579
  • [22] Brazilian assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services: summary for policy makers
    Joly, Carlos A.
    Scarano, Fabio R.
    Bustamante, Mercedes
    Cecy Gadda, Tatiana Maria
    Walter Metzger, Jean Paul
    Seixas, Cristiana Simao
    Ometto, Jean Pierre H. B.
    Flauzino Pires, Aliny Patricia
    Boesing, Andrea Larissa
    Rocha Sousa, Francisco Diogo
    Brandao Quintao, Jose Mauricio
    Goncalves, Leandra Regina
    Gorgulho Padgurschi, Maira de Campos
    dos Santos de Aquino, Michely Ferreira
    Drummond de Castro, Paula Felicio
    dos Santos, Isabela Lima
    [J]. BIOTA NEOTROPICA, 2019, 19 (04):
  • [23] Ecosystem services in environmental assessment - Help or hindrance?
    Baker, J.
    Sheate, W. R.
    Phillips, P.
    Eales, R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 40 : 3 - 13
  • [24] Balancing the approaches of environmental conservation by considering ecosystem services as well as biodiversity
    Singh, SP
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2002, 82 (11): : 1331 - 1335
  • [25] Editorial: Biodiversity, ecosystem functions and services: Interrelationship with environmental and human health
    Zhang, Yixin
    Wang, Zhenhong
    Lu, Yonglong
    Zuo, Li
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 10
  • [26] Using social data in strategic environmental assessment to conserve biodiversity
    Ives, Christopher D.
    Biggs, Duan
    Hardy, Mathew J.
    Lechner, Alex M.
    Wolnicki, Mateusz
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 47 : 332 - 341
  • [27] Guidance to develop specific protection goals options for environmental risk assessment at EFSA, in relation to biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Benford, Diane
    Halldorsson, Thorhallur
    Hardy, Anthony
    Jeger, Michael John
    Knutsen, Katrine Helle
    More, Simon
    Mortensen, Alicja
    Naegeli, Hanspeter
    Noteborn, Hubert
    Ockleford, Colin
    Ricci, Antonia
    Rychen, Guido
    Schlatter, Josef R.
    Silano, Vittorio
    Solecki, Roland
    Turck, Dominique
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2016, 14 (06)
  • [28] Indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem services: towards an improved framework for ecosystems assessment
    Christian K. Feld
    José Paulo Sousa
    Pedro Martins da Silva
    Terence P. Dawson
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19 : 2895 - 2919
  • [29] Global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA
    Koellner, Thomas
    Geyer, Roland
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (06): : 1185 - 1187
  • [30] Indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem services: towards an improved framework for ecosystems assessment
    Feld, Christian K.
    Sousa, Jose Paulo
    da Silva, Pedro Martins
    Dawson, Terence P.
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (10) : 2895 - 2919