A Risk-Informed Interference Assessment of MetSat/LTE Coexistence

被引:4
|
作者
De Vries, J. Pierre [1 ]
Livnat, Uri [2 ]
Tonkin, Susan P.
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Law Sch, Silicon Flatirons Ctr, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Nokia, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2017年 / 5卷
关键词
Cellular phones; clutter; governmental factors; interference; mobile communication; Monte Carlo methods; risk analysis; satellite communication; satellite ground stations;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2685592
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Quantitative risk assessment has recently been proposed to assess the impact of a new radio service allocation on incumbents. This paper demonstrates its viability by performing a risk-informed interference assessment in a recent U.S. case: the protection of meteorological satellite earth stations from interference by cellular mobile transmitters. We find that the hazard selected by policy makers (co-channel interference with the receiving antenna at 5 elevation) was not the most severe, and that their worst case approach overlooked more significant risks, notably adjacent band interference. We begin with an inventory of the performance hazards. We survey consequence metrics that quantify the severity of interference, and select the interference protection criteria defined in Recommendation ITU-R SA.1026-4. We then use Monte Carlo modeling to calculate probability distributions of resulting interference due to co-channel and adjacent band transmissions. We identify a co-channel exclusion distance that keeps interference risk below the SA.1026-4 criteria. We show that the binding constraint is not the ITU-R "long-term" interference mode (5 antenna elevation), but rather the "short-term" interference when the elevation is 13 degrees. We give an extensive sensitivity analysis showing that the propagation modeling, and particularly the choice of clutter model, can have a significant effect on the results. We conclude that quantitative risk assessment yields useful insights for analyzing coexistence. Protection criteria that combine an interfering power level with statistical exceedance limits were essential to our analysis, and we recommend that policy makers adopt statistical service rules more widely to support future risk analysis. Our analysis was limited by the unavailability of baseline values for service metrics, and the lack of transparency in previous studies, notably ITU-R recommendations. We recommend that regulators encourage parties to provide baseline values and the methods underlying interference criteria and coexistence assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:6290 / 6313
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk-Informed Condition Assessment of a Bridge with Alkali-Aggregate Reaction
    Hariri-Ardebili, Mohammad Amin
    Saouma, Victor E.
    Merz, Christine
    [J]. ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2018, 115 (02) : 475 - 487
  • [22] Probabilistic safety assessment techniques applied to risk-informed asset management
    Liming, JK
    Kee, EJ
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 445 - 452
  • [23] Risk-Informed Requirements for Design and Assessment of Structures Under Temporary Use
    Hingorani, Ramon
    Tanner, Peter
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2020, 40 (01) : 68 - 82
  • [24] Flood Assessment for Risk-Informed Planning along the Sirba River, Niger
    Tiepolo, Maurizio
    Rosso, Maurizio
    Massazza, Giovanni
    Belcore, Elena
    Issa, Souradji
    Braccio, Sarah
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (15)
  • [25] Realising the potential of risk-informed PrEP
    Schaefer, Robin
    Schmidt, Heather-Marie A.
    [J]. LANCET HIV, 2022, 9 (05): : E302 - E304
  • [26] INTEGRITY RISK-INFORMED DECISION MAKING
    Hassanien, Sherif
    Langer, Doug
    Abdolrazaghi, Mona
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 2, 2018,
  • [27] Quantitative Risk-Informed Design of Levees
    Sibley, Heather M.
    Vroman, Noah D.
    Shewbridge, Scott E.
    [J]. GEO-RISK 2017: IMPACT OF SPATIAL VARIABILITY, PROBABILISTIC SITE CHARACTERIZATION, AND GEOHAZARDS, 2017, (284): : 76 - 90
  • [28] Defaults and incentives in risk-informed regulation
    Bier, VM
    Jang, SC
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1999, 5 (04): : 635 - 644
  • [29] RISK-INFORMED SAFETY MARGIN CHARACTERIZATION
    Hess, Stephen M.
    Dinh, Nam
    Gaertner, John P.
    Szilard, Ronaldo
    [J]. ICONE 17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, VOL 1, 2009, : 11 - 17
  • [30] Risk-informed inservice inspection program
    Mayfield, ME
    Jackson, DA
    Guttman, J
    Cunningham, M
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2000, 195 (02) : 211 - 215