The German Version of the Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale (GARS): Reliability and Validity

被引:12
|
作者
Domes, Gregor [1 ]
Marx, Lisa [1 ]
Spenthof, Ines [1 ]
Heinrichs, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Dept Psychol, Lab Biol & Personal Psychol, Hugstetter Str 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
EYE-TO-EYE; SOCIAL PHOBIA; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; VISUAL SCANPATH; FEAR; BEHAVIOR; CONTACT; RANK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0150807
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Fear of eye gaze and avoidance of eye contact are core features of social anxiety disorders (SAD). To measure self-reported fear and avoidance of eye gaze, the Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale (GARS) has been developed and validated in recent years in its English version. The main objectives of the present study were to psychometrically evaluate the German translation of the GARS concerning its reliability, factorial structure, and validity. Methods Three samples of participants were enrolled in the study. (1) A non-patient sample (n = 353) completed the GARS and a set of trait questionnaires to assess internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factorial structure, and concurrent and divergent validity. (2) A sample of patients with SAD (n = 33) was compared to a healthy control group (n = 30) regarding their scores on the GARS and the trait measures. Results The German GARS fear and avoidance scales exhibited excellent internal consistency and high stability over 2 and 4 months, as did the original version. The English version's factorial structure was replicated, yielding two categories of situations: (1) everyday situations and (2) situations involving high evaluative threat. GARS fear and avoidance displayed convergent validity with trait measures of social anxiety and were markedly higher in patients with GSAD than in healthy controls. Fear and avoidance of eye contact in situations involving high levels of evaluative threat related more closely to social anxiety than to gaze anxiety in everyday situations. Conclusions The German version of the GARS has demonstrated reliability and validity similar to the original version, and is thus well suited to capture fear and avoidance of eye contact in different social situations as a valid self-report measure of social anxiety and related disorders in the social domain for use in both clinical practice and research.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale
    Proczkowska-Bjorklund, M.
    Berglund, I. Gimbler
    Ericsson, E.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 56 (04) : 491 - 497
  • [42] Reliability and validity of a faces version of the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale
    Howard, Karen E.
    Freeman, Ruth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2007, 17 (04) : 281 - 288
  • [43] Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale
    Jerez, C.
    Ullan, A. M.
    Lazaro, J. J.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2016, 63 (06): : 320 - 326
  • [44] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale
    Hatipoglu, Zehra
    Kirdok, Oguzhan
    Ozcengiz, Dilek
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 49 (03) : 730 - +
  • [45] Postpartum Specific Anxiety Scale (PSAS): Reliability and validity of the Turkish version
    Duran, Songuel
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2020, 56 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [46] Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the social attributes of Dental Anxiety Scale
    Aartman, IHA
    Hoogstraten, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 1999, 107 (05) : 322 - 327
  • [47] Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of Robot Anxiety Scale in Chinese Adults
    Cai, Jie
    Sun, Yuxuan
    Niu, Chunling
    Qi, Wei
    Fu, Xurong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2024, 40 (13) : 3355 - 3364
  • [48] Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale modified for autism spectrum disorder
    Maddox, Brenna B.
    Lecavalier, Luc
    Miller, Judith S.
    Pritchett, Jill
    Hollway, Jill
    White, Susan W.
    Gillespie, Scott
    Evans, Andrea N.
    Schultz, Robert T.
    Herrington, John D.
    Bearss, Karen
    Scahill, Lawrence
    AUTISM, 2020, 24 (07) : 1773 - 1782
  • [49] Validity and reliability of mania rating scale
    Apiquian, R
    Paez, F
    Tapia, RO
    Fresan, A
    Vallejo, G
    Nicolini, H
    SALUD MENTAL, 1997, 20 (03) : 23 - 29
  • [50] Anxiety rating for children - Revised: Reliability and validity
    Bernstein, GA
    Crosby, RD
    Perwien, AR
    Borchardt, CM
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 1996, 10 (02) : 97 - 114