The German Version of the Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale (GARS): Reliability and Validity

被引:12
|
作者
Domes, Gregor [1 ]
Marx, Lisa [1 ]
Spenthof, Ines [1 ]
Heinrichs, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Dept Psychol, Lab Biol & Personal Psychol, Hugstetter Str 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
EYE-TO-EYE; SOCIAL PHOBIA; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; VISUAL SCANPATH; FEAR; BEHAVIOR; CONTACT; RANK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0150807
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Fear of eye gaze and avoidance of eye contact are core features of social anxiety disorders (SAD). To measure self-reported fear and avoidance of eye gaze, the Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale (GARS) has been developed and validated in recent years in its English version. The main objectives of the present study were to psychometrically evaluate the German translation of the GARS concerning its reliability, factorial structure, and validity. Methods Three samples of participants were enrolled in the study. (1) A non-patient sample (n = 353) completed the GARS and a set of trait questionnaires to assess internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factorial structure, and concurrent and divergent validity. (2) A sample of patients with SAD (n = 33) was compared to a healthy control group (n = 30) regarding their scores on the GARS and the trait measures. Results The German GARS fear and avoidance scales exhibited excellent internal consistency and high stability over 2 and 4 months, as did the original version. The English version's factorial structure was replicated, yielding two categories of situations: (1) everyday situations and (2) situations involving high evaluative threat. GARS fear and avoidance displayed convergent validity with trait measures of social anxiety and were markedly higher in patients with GSAD than in healthy controls. Fear and avoidance of eye contact in situations involving high levels of evaluative threat related more closely to social anxiety than to gaze anxiety in everyday situations. Conclusions The German version of the GARS has demonstrated reliability and validity similar to the original version, and is thus well suited to capture fear and avoidance of eye contact in different social situations as a valid self-report measure of social anxiety and related disorders in the social domain for use in both clinical practice and research.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The German version of the Individualized Care Scale - assessing validity and reliability
    Koeberich, Stefan
    Suhonen, Riitta
    Feuchtinger, Johanna
    Farin, Erik
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2015, 9 : 483 - 494
  • [32] Reliability and validity of the German version of the Maternal–Fetal Attachment Scale
    Anne Doster
    Stephanie Wallwiener
    Mitho Müller
    Lina Maria Matthies
    Katharina Plewniok
    Sandra Feller
    Ruben-Jeremias Kuon
    Christof Sohn
    Joachim Rom
    Markus Wallwiener
    Corinna Reck
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 297 : 1157 - 1167
  • [33] Spanish version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98: Reliability and validity
    Fonseca, F
    Bulbena, A
    Navarrete, R
    Aragay, N
    Capo, M
    Lobo, A
    Trzepacz, PT
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2005, 59 (03) : 147 - 151
  • [34] Reliability and validity of Japanese version of Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale
    Chikada, Ayaka
    Mitsui, Jun
    Matsukawa, Takashi
    Ishiura, Hiroyuki
    Toda, Tatsushi
    Ogata, Katsuhisa
    Goto, Jun
    Wenning, Gregor K.
    Tsuji, Shoji
    NEUROLOGY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 9 (02): : 171 - 180
  • [35] Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Brief Agitation Rating Scale (BARS) in dementia
    Sommer, Oskar H.
    Engedal, Knut
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2011, 15 (02) : 252 - 258
  • [36] Korean Version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98: Reliability and Validity
    Lee, Yanghyun
    Ryu, Jian
    Lee, Jinyoung
    Kim, Hwi-Jung
    Shin, Im Hee
    Kim, Jeong-Lan
    Trzepacz, Paula T.
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 8 (01) : 30 - 38
  • [37] The validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Cancer-chemotherapy Concerns Rating Scale
    Kwon, In Gak
    Cho, Myung Sook
    Ham, Yun Hee
    Shin, Hee Yeon
    Fujimoto, Keiko
    Kikuchi, Saori
    Lee, Bumsuk
    Kanda, Kiyoko
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 46 (03) : 260 - 263
  • [38] Chinese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98: reliability and validity
    Huang, Ming-Chyi
    Lee, Chun-Hung
    Lai, Ying-Ching
    Kao, Yu-Fen
    Lin, Hong-Yen
    Chen, Chun-Hsin
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 50 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [39] Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98:: reliability and validity
    de Negreiros, Daniel Philippi
    Augusto da Silva Meleiro, Alexandrina Maria
    Furlanetto, Leticia M.
    Trzepacz, Paula T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 23 (05) : 472 - 477
  • [40] Factor analysis, reliability and validity of a Pashto version of Hamilton rating scale for depression
    Irfan, Muhammad
    Sethi, Mifrah Rauf
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 73 (05) : 1024 - 1028