Genomic Prediction in Pea: Effect of Marker Density and Training Population Size and Composition on Prediction Accuracy

被引:70
|
作者
Tayeh, Nadim [1 ]
Klein, Anthony [1 ]
Le Paslier, Marie-Christine [2 ]
Jacquin, Francoise [1 ]
Houtin, Herve [1 ]
Rond, Celine [1 ]
Chabert-Martinello, Marianne [1 ]
Magnin-Robert, Jean-Bernard [1 ]
Marget, Pascal [1 ]
Aubert, Gregoire [1 ]
Burstin, Judith [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Agroecol UMR1347, F-21034 Dijon, France
[2] CEA IG Ctr Natl Genotypage, INRA, Etud Polymorphisme Genomes Vegetaux US1279, Evry, France
来源
关键词
pea (Pisum sativum L.); GenoPea 13.2K SNP Array; genomic selection; marker density; training set; prediction accuracy; SELECTION; RELIABILITY; TRAITS; SET;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2015.00941
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Pea is an important food and feed crop and a valuable component of low input farming systems. Improving resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses is a major breeding target to enhance yield potential and regularity. Genomic selection (GS) has lately emerged as a promising technique to increase the accuracy and gain of marker-based selection. It uses genome-wide molecular marker data to predict the breeding values of candidate lines to selection. A collection of 339 genetic resource accessions (CRB339) was subjected to high-density genotyping using the GenoPea 13.2K SNP Array. Genomic prediction accuracy was evaluated for thousand seed weight (TSW), the number of seeds per plant (NSeed), and the date of flowering (BegFlo). Mean cross environment prediction accuracies reached 0.83 for TSW, 0.68 for NSeed, and 0.65 for BegFlo. For each trait, the statistical method, the marker density, and/or the training population size and composition used for prediction were varied to investigate their effects on prediction accuracy: the effect was large for the size and composition of the training population but limited for the statistical method and marker density. Maximizing the relatedness between individuals in the training and test sets, through the CDmean-based method, significantly improved prediction accuracies. A cross-population cross-validation experiment was further conducted using the CRB339 collection as a training population set and nine recombinant inbred lines populations as test set. Prediction quality was high with mean Q(2) of 0.44 for TSW and 0.59 for BegFlo. Results are discussed in the light of current efforts to develop GS strategies in pea.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimising Genomic Selection in Wheat: Effect of Marker Density, Population Size and Population Structure on Prediction Accuracy
    Norman, Adam
    Taylor, Julian
    Edwards, James
    Kuchel, Haydn
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2018, 8 (09): : 2889 - 2899
  • [2] A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction
    Erbe, Malena
    Gredler, Birgit
    Seefried, Franz Reinhold
    Bapst, Beat
    Simianer, Henner
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [3] Effects of SNP marker density and training population size on prediction accuracy in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genomic selection
    Wang, Hu
    Bai, Yuguang
    Biligetu, Bill
    PLANT GENOME, 2024, 17 (01):
  • [4] Effect of Trait Heritability, Training Population Size and Marker Density on Genomic Prediction Accuracy Estimation in 22 bi-parental Tropical Maize Populations
    Zhang, Ao
    Wang, Hongwu
    Beyene, Yoseph
    Semagn, Kassa
    Liu, Yubo
    Cao, Shiliang
    Cui, Zhenhai
    Ruan, Yanye
    Burgueno, Juan
    San Vicente, Felix
    Olsen, Michael
    Prasanna, Boddupalli M.
    Crossa, Jose
    Yu, Haiqiu
    Zhang, Xuecai
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 8
  • [5] The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
    Stefan McKinnon Edwards
    Jaap B. Buntjer
    Robert Jackson
    Alison R. Bentley
    Jacob Lage
    Ed Byrne
    Chris Burt
    Peter Jack
    Simon Berry
    Edward Flatman
    Bruno Poupard
    Stephen Smith
    Charlotte Hayes
    R. Chris Gaynor
    Gregor Gorjanc
    Phil Howell
    Eric Ober
    Ian J. Mackay
    John M. Hickey
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2019, 132 : 1943 - 1952
  • [6] The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
    Edwards, Stefan McKinnon
    Buntjer, Jaap B.
    Jackson, Robert
    Bentley, Alison R.
    Lage, Jacob
    Byrne, Ed
    Burt, Chris
    Jack, Peter
    Berry, Simon
    Flatman, Edward
    Poupard, Bruno
    Smith, Stephen
    Hayes, Charlotte
    Gaynor, R. Chris
    Gorjanc, Gregor
    Howell, Phil
    Ober, Eric
    Mackay, Ian J.
    Hickey, John M.
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2019, 132 (07) : 1943 - 1952
  • [7] Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels
    Zhang, Z.
    Ding, X.
    Liu, J.
    Zhang, Q.
    de Koning, D. -J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (07) : 3642 - 3650
  • [8] Effect of marker-data editing on the accuracy of genomic prediction
    Edriss, V.
    Guldbrandtsen, B.
    Lund, M. S.
    Su, G.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2013, 130 (02) : 128 - 135
  • [9] Accuracy of genomic prediction using mixed low-density marker panels
    Hou, Lianjie
    Liang, Wenshuai
    Xu, Guli
    Huang, Bo
    Zhang, Xiquan
    Hu, Ching Yuan
    Wang, Chong
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2020, 60 (08) : 999 - 1007
  • [10] Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction
    Liu, Zengting
    Seefried, Franz R.
    Reinhardt, Friedrich
    Rensing, Stephan
    Thaller, Georg
    Reents, Reinhard
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43