Accuracy of genomic prediction using mixed low-density marker panels

被引:2
|
作者
Hou, Lianjie [1 ]
Liang, Wenshuai [1 ]
Xu, Guli [1 ]
Huang, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Xiquan [1 ]
Hu, Ching Yuan [2 ]
Wang, Chong [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Agroanim Genom & Mol Breed, Natl Engn Res Ctr Breeding Swine Ind, 483 Wushan Rd, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Coll Trop Agr & Human Resources, Dept Human Nutr Food & Anim Sci, AgSci, 1955 East West Rd,415J, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
genomic selection; SNP imputation; low-density polymorphism panel; mixed low-density panel; SELECTION; POPULATION; STRATEGIES; IMPUTATION; VALUES;
D O I
10.1071/AN18503
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Low-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (LD-SNP) panel is one effective way to reduce the cost of genomic selection in animal breeding. The present study proposes a new type of LD-SNP panel called mixed low-density (MLD) panel, which considers SNPs with a substantial effect estimated by Bayes method B (BayesB) from many traits and evenly spaced distribution simultaneously. Simulated and real data were used to compare the imputation accuracy and genomic-selection accuracy of two types of LD-SNP panels. The result of genotyping imputation for simulated data showed that the number of quantitative trait loci (QTL) had limited influence on the imputation accuracy only for MLD panels. Evenly spaced (ELD) panel was not affected by QTL. For real data, ELD performed slightly better than did MLD when panel contained 500 and 1000 SNP. However, this advantage vanished quickly as the density increased. The result of genomic selection for simulated data using BayesB showed that MLD performed much better than did ELD when QTL was 100. For real data, MLD also outperformed ELD in growth and carcass traits when using BayesB. In conclusion, the MLD strategy is superior to ELD in genomic selection under most situations.
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1007
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels
    Zhang, Z.
    Ding, X.
    Liu, J.
    Zhang, Q.
    de Koning, D. -J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (07) : 3642 - 3650
  • [2] Genomic Selection Using Low-Density Marker Panels
    Habier, D.
    Fernando, R. L.
    Dekkers, J. C. M.
    GENETICS, 2009, 182 (01) : 343 - 353
  • [3] Optimizing genomic prediction using low-density marker panels for streptococcosis resistance in red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.)
    Sukhavachana, S.
    Tongyoo, P.
    Luengnaruemitchai, A.
    Poompuang, S.
    ANIMAL GENETICS, 2021, 52 (05) : 667 - 674
  • [4] The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa
    Aliloo, H.
    Mrode, R.
    Okeyo, A. M.
    Ni, G.
    Goddard, M. E.
    Gibson, J. P.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (10) : 9108 - 9127
  • [5] USING ONLY LOW-DENSITY MARKER PANELS FOR GENOMIC SELECTION CAN LEAD TO DECLINING GENOMIC ESTIMATED BREEDING VALUE ACCURACY OVER TIME
    Delomas, Thomas A.
    Hollenbeck, Christopher M.
    Matt, Joseph L.
    Thompson, Neil F.
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2023, 42 : 75 - 75
  • [6] Accuracy of genomic prediction for seed oil concentration in high-oleic soybean populations using a low-density marker panel
    Hemingway, Joel
    Schnebly, Steve R.
    Rajcan, Istvan
    CROP SCIENCE, 2021, 61 (06) : 4012 - 4021
  • [7] Genomic Selection for Growth Traits in Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas): Potential of Low-Density Marker Panels for Breeding Value Prediction
    Gutierrez, Alejandro P.
    Matika, Oswald
    Bean, Tim P.
    Houston, Ross D.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2018, 9
  • [8] Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle
    Zhang, Z.
    Druet, T.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (11) : 5487 - 5494
  • [9] Genomic Prediction Using Low Density Marker Panels in Aquaculture: Performance Across Species, Traits, and Genotyping Platforms
    Kriaridou, Christina
    Tsairidou, Smaragda
    Houston, Ross D.
    Robledo, Diego
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2020, 11
  • [10] High density marker panels, SNPs prioritizing and accuracy of genomic selection
    Chang, L. Y.
    Toghiani, S.
    Aggrey, S. E.
    Rekaya, R.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 141 - 142