Accuracy of genomic prediction using mixed low-density marker panels

被引:2
|
作者
Hou, Lianjie [1 ]
Liang, Wenshuai [1 ]
Xu, Guli [1 ]
Huang, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Xiquan [1 ]
Hu, Ching Yuan [2 ]
Wang, Chong [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Agroanim Genom & Mol Breed, Natl Engn Res Ctr Breeding Swine Ind, 483 Wushan Rd, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Coll Trop Agr & Human Resources, Dept Human Nutr Food & Anim Sci, AgSci, 1955 East West Rd,415J, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
genomic selection; SNP imputation; low-density polymorphism panel; mixed low-density panel; SELECTION; POPULATION; STRATEGIES; IMPUTATION; VALUES;
D O I
10.1071/AN18503
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Low-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (LD-SNP) panel is one effective way to reduce the cost of genomic selection in animal breeding. The present study proposes a new type of LD-SNP panel called mixed low-density (MLD) panel, which considers SNPs with a substantial effect estimated by Bayes method B (BayesB) from many traits and evenly spaced distribution simultaneously. Simulated and real data were used to compare the imputation accuracy and genomic-selection accuracy of two types of LD-SNP panels. The result of genotyping imputation for simulated data showed that the number of quantitative trait loci (QTL) had limited influence on the imputation accuracy only for MLD panels. Evenly spaced (ELD) panel was not affected by QTL. For real data, ELD performed slightly better than did MLD when panel contained 500 and 1000 SNP. However, this advantage vanished quickly as the density increased. The result of genomic selection for simulated data using BayesB showed that MLD performed much better than did ELD when QTL was 100. For real data, MLD also outperformed ELD in growth and carcass traits when using BayesB. In conclusion, the MLD strategy is superior to ELD in genomic selection under most situations.
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1007
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy of Estimation of Genomic Breeding Values in Pigs Using Low-Density Genotypes and Imputation
    Badke, Yvonne M.
    Bates, Ronald O.
    Ernst, Catherine W.
    Fix, Justin
    Steibel, Juan P.
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2014, 4 (04): : 623 - 631
  • [22] Genomic breeding value prediction using three Bayesian methods and application to reduced density marker panels
    Matthew A Cleveland
    Selma Forni
    Nader Deeb
    Christian Maltecca
    BMC Proceedings, 4 (Suppl 1)
  • [23] Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panels
    Yoshida, Grazyella M.
    Carvalheiro, Roberto
    Lhorente, Jean P.
    Correa, Katharina
    Figueroa, Rene
    Houston, Ross D.
    Yanez, Jose M.
    AQUACULTURE, 2018, 491 : 147 - 154
  • [24] Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs
    Grossi, D. A.
    Brito, L. F.
    Jafarikia, M.
    Schenkel, F. S.
    Feng, Z.
    ANIMAL, 2018, 12 (11) : 2235 - 2245
  • [25] Low-density SNP markers with high prediction accuracy of genomic selection for bacterial wilt resistance in tomato
    Yeon, Jeyun
    Le, Ngoc Thi
    Heo, Jaehun
    Sim, Sung-Chur
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15
  • [26] Improving accuracy of genomic prediction in Brangus cattle by adding animals with imputed low-density SNP genotypes
    Lopes, F. B.
    Wu, X. -L.
    Li, H.
    Xu, J.
    Perkins, T.
    Genho, J.
    Ferretti, R.
    Tait, R. G., Jr.
    Bauck, S.
    Rosa, G. J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2018, 135 (01) : 14 - 27
  • [27] Factor analysis applied in genomic prediction considering different density marker panels in rice
    Izabela Clara Fialho
    Camila Ferreira Azevedo
    Ana Carolina Campana Nascimento
    Filipe Ribeiro Formiga Teixeira
    Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende
    Moysés Nascimento
    Euphytica, 2023, 219
  • [28] Factor analysis applied in genomic prediction considering different density marker panels in rice
    Fialho, Izabela Clara
    Azevedo, Camila Ferreira
    Nascimento, Ana Carolina Campana
    Teixeira, Filipe Ribeiro Formiga
    de Resende, Marcos Deon Vilela
    Nascimento, Moyses
    EUPHYTICA, 2023, 219 (09)
  • [29] Estimation of variance and genomic prediction using genotypes imputed from low-density marker subsets for carcass traits in Japanese black cattle
    Ogawa, Shinichiro
    Matsuda, Hirokazu
    Taniguchi, Yukio
    Watanabe, Toshio
    Sugimoto, Yoshikazu
    Iwaisaki, Hiroaki
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2016, 87 (09) : 1106 - 1113
  • [30] Genomic Prediction in Pea: Effect of Marker Density and Training Population Size and Composition on Prediction Accuracy
    Tayeh, Nadim
    Klein, Anthony
    Le Paslier, Marie-Christine
    Jacquin, Francoise
    Houtin, Herve
    Rond, Celine
    Chabert-Martinello, Marianne
    Magnin-Robert, Jean-Bernard
    Marget, Pascal
    Aubert, Gregoire
    Burstin, Judith
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2015, 6