Genomic Prediction in Pea: Effect of Marker Density and Training Population Size and Composition on Prediction Accuracy

被引:70
|
作者
Tayeh, Nadim [1 ]
Klein, Anthony [1 ]
Le Paslier, Marie-Christine [2 ]
Jacquin, Francoise [1 ]
Houtin, Herve [1 ]
Rond, Celine [1 ]
Chabert-Martinello, Marianne [1 ]
Magnin-Robert, Jean-Bernard [1 ]
Marget, Pascal [1 ]
Aubert, Gregoire [1 ]
Burstin, Judith [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Agroecol UMR1347, F-21034 Dijon, France
[2] CEA IG Ctr Natl Genotypage, INRA, Etud Polymorphisme Genomes Vegetaux US1279, Evry, France
来源
关键词
pea (Pisum sativum L.); GenoPea 13.2K SNP Array; genomic selection; marker density; training set; prediction accuracy; SELECTION; RELIABILITY; TRAITS; SET;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2015.00941
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Pea is an important food and feed crop and a valuable component of low input farming systems. Improving resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses is a major breeding target to enhance yield potential and regularity. Genomic selection (GS) has lately emerged as a promising technique to increase the accuracy and gain of marker-based selection. It uses genome-wide molecular marker data to predict the breeding values of candidate lines to selection. A collection of 339 genetic resource accessions (CRB339) was subjected to high-density genotyping using the GenoPea 13.2K SNP Array. Genomic prediction accuracy was evaluated for thousand seed weight (TSW), the number of seeds per plant (NSeed), and the date of flowering (BegFlo). Mean cross environment prediction accuracies reached 0.83 for TSW, 0.68 for NSeed, and 0.65 for BegFlo. For each trait, the statistical method, the marker density, and/or the training population size and composition used for prediction were varied to investigate their effects on prediction accuracy: the effect was large for the size and composition of the training population but limited for the statistical method and marker density. Maximizing the relatedness between individuals in the training and test sets, through the CDmean-based method, significantly improved prediction accuracies. A cross-population cross-validation experiment was further conducted using the CRB339 collection as a training population set and nine recombinant inbred lines populations as test set. Prediction quality was high with mean Q(2) of 0.44 for TSW and 0.59 for BegFlo. Results are discussed in the light of current efforts to develop GS strategies in pea.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring the size of reference population for expected accuracy of genomic prediction using simulated and real data in Japanese Black cattle
    Masayuki Takeda
    Keiichi Inoue
    Hidemi Oyama
    Katsuo Uchiyama
    Kanako Yoshinari
    Nanae Sasago
    Takatoshi Kojima
    Masashi Kashima
    Hiromi Suzuki
    Takehiro Kamata
    Masahiro Kumagai
    Wataru Takasugi
    Tatsuya Aonuma
    Yuusuke Soma
    Sachi Konno
    Takaaki Saito
    Mana Ishida
    Eiji Muraki
    Yoshinobu Inoue
    Megumi Takayama
    Shota Nariai
    Ryoya Hideshima
    Ryoichi Nakamura
    Sayuri Nishikawa
    Hiroshi Kobayashi
    Eri Shibata
    Koji Yamamoto
    Kenichi Yoshimura
    Hironori Matsuda
    Tetsuro Inoue
    Atsumi Fujita
    Shohei Terayama
    Kazuya Inoue
    Sayuri Morita
    Ryotaro Nakashima
    Ryohei Suezawa
    Takeshi Hanamure
    Atsushi Zoda
    Yoshinobu Uemoto
    BMC Genomics, 22
  • [42] Exploring the size of reference population for expected accuracy of genomic prediction using simulated and real data in Japanese Black cattle
    Takeda, Masayuki
    Inoue, Keiichi
    Oyama, Hidemi
    Uchiyama, Katsuo
    Yoshinari, Kanako
    Sasago, Nanae
    Kojima, Takatoshi
    Kashima, Masashi
    Suzuki, Hiromi
    Kamata, Takehiro
    Kumagai, Masahiro
    Takasugi, Wataru
    Aonuma, Tatsuya
    Soma, Yuusuke
    Konno, Sachi
    Saito, Takaaki
    Ishida, Mana
    Muraki, Eiji
    Inoue, Yoshinobu
    Takayama, Megumi
    Nariai, Shota
    Hideshima, Ryoya
    Nakamura, Ryoichi
    Nishikawa, Sayuri
    Kobayashi, Hiroshi
    Shibata, Eri
    Yamamoto, Koji
    Yoshimura, Kenichi
    Matsuda, Hironori
    Inoue, Tetsuro
    Fujita, Atsumi
    Terayama, Shohei
    Inoue, Kazuya
    Morita, Sayuri
    Nakashima, Ryotaro
    Suezawa, Ryohei
    Hanamure, Takeshi
    Zoda, Atsushi
    Uemoto, Yoshinobu
    BMC GENOMICS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [43] The genetic connectedness calculated from genomic information and its effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction
    Zhang, Suo-Yu
    Olasege, Babatunde Shittu
    Liu, Deng-Ying
    Wang, Qi-Shan
    Pan, Yu-Chun
    Ma, Pei-Pei
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [44] Improving Prediction Accuracy Using Multi-allelic Haplotype Prediction and Training Population Optimization in Wheat
    Sallam, Ahmad H.
    Conley, Emily
    Prakapenka, Dzianis
    Da, Yang
    Anderson, James A.
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2020, 10 (07): : 2265 - 2273
  • [45] Improving Genomic Prediction Accuracy in the Chinese Holstein Population by Combining with the Nordic Holstein Reference Population
    Zhang, Zipeng
    Shi, Shaolei
    Zhang, Qin
    Aamand, Gert P.
    Lund, Mogens S.
    Su, Guosheng
    Ding, Xiangdong
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [46] Genomic prediction of fruit texture and training population optimization towards the application of genomic selection in apple
    Roth, Morgane
    Muranty, Helene
    Di Guardo, Mario
    Guerra, Walter
    Patocchi, Andrea
    Costa, Fabrizio
    HORTICULTURE RESEARCH, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [47] Effect of subdivision of the Lacaune dairy sheep breed on the accuracy of genomic prediction
    Wicki, M.
    Raoul, J.
    Legarra, A.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2023, 106 (08) : 5570 - 5581
  • [48] Effect of quality control, density and allele frequency of markers on the accuracy of genomic prediction for complex traits in Nellore cattle
    Bresolin, Tiago
    Rosa, Guilherme Jordao de Magalhaes
    Valente, Bruno Dourado
    Espigolan, Rafael
    Mansan Gordo, Daniel Gustavo
    Braz, Camila Urbano
    Fernandes Junior, Gerardo Alves
    Braga Magalhaes, Ana Fabricia
    Garcia, Diogo Anastacio
    Frezarim, Gabriela Bonfa
    Carneiro Leao, Guilherme Fonseca
    Carvalheiro, Roberto
    Baldi, Fernando
    de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes
    de Albuquerque, Lucia Galvao
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2019, 59 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [49] The trade-off between density marker panels size and predictive ability of genomic prediction for agronomic traits in Coffea canephora
    de Sousa, Ithalo Coelho
    Barreto, Cynthia Aparecida Valiati
    Caixeta, Eveline Teixeira
    Nascimento, Ana Carolina Campana
    Azevedo, Camila Ferreira
    Alkimim, Emilly Ruas
    Nascimento, Moyses
    EUPHYTICA, 2024, 220 (04)
  • [50] Multi-trait genomic prediction improves selection accuracy for enhancing seed mineral concentrations in pea
    Atanda, Sikiru Adeniyi
    Steffes, Jenna
    Lan, Yang
    Al Bari, Md Abdullah
    Kim, Jeong-Hwa
    Morales, Mario
    Johnson, Josephine P.
    Saludares, Rica
    Worral, Hannah
    Piche, Lisa
    Ross, Andrew
    Grusak, Mike
    Coyne, Clarice
    McGee, Rebecca
    Rao, Jiajia
    Bandillo, Nonoy
    PLANT GENOME, 2022, 15 (04):