Utility of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging-Based Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Differentiating Malignant from Benign Masses in Head and Neck Region

被引:14
|
作者
Ma, Gao [1 ]
Xu, Xiao-Quan [1 ]
Hu, Hao [1 ]
Su, Guo-Yi [1 ]
Shen, Jie [1 ]
Shi, Hai-Bin [1 ]
Wu, Fei-Yun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Head and neck; Differentiation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Diffusion kurtosis imaging; Tumor; Neoplasm; Imaging biomarker; PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE; COEFFICIENT VALUES; SINONASAL LESIONS; PROSTATE-CANCER; BREAST-LESIONS; CARCINOMA; FEASIBILITY; QUALITY; MODEL; MRI;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2018.19.3.443
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RS-EPI)-based diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and that of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating malignant from benign masses in head and neck region. Materials and Methods: Between December 2014 and April 2016, we retrospectively enrolled 72 consecutive patients with head and neck masses who had undergone RS-EPI-based DKI scan (b value of 0, 500, 1000, and 1500 s/mm(2)) for pretreatment evaluation. Imaging data were post-processed by using monoexponential and diffusion kurtosis (DK) model for quantitation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), apparent diffusion for Gaussian distribution (D-app), and apparent kurtosis coefficient (K-app). Unpaired t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare differences of quantitative parameters between malignant and benign groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to determine and compare the diagnostic ability of quantitative parameters in predicting malignancy. Results: Malignant group demonstrated significantly lower ADC (0.754 +/- 0.167 vs. 1.222 +/- 0.420, p < 0.001) and Dapp (1.029 +/- 0.226 vs. 1.640 +/- 0.445, p < 0.001) while higher Kapp (1.344 +/- 0.309 vs. 0.715 +/- 0.249, p < 0.001) than benign group. Using a combination of Dapp and Kapp as diagnostic index, significantly better differentiating performance was achieved than using ADC alone (area under curve: 0.956 vs. 0.876, p = 0.042). Conclusion: Compared to DWI, DKI could provide additional data related to tumor heterogeneity with significantly better differentiating performance. Its derived quantitative metrics could serve as a promising imaging biomarker for differentiating malignant from benign masses in head and neck region.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 451
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Malignant Breast Lesions Using High-resolution Readout-segmented Diffusion-weighted Echo-planar Imaging: Comparison with Pathology
    Kishimoto, Ayami Ohno
    Kataoka, Masako
    Iima, Mami
    Honda, Maya
    Miyake, Kanae Kawai
    Ohashi, Akane
    Ota, Rie
    Kataoka, Tatsuki
    Sakurai, Takaki
    Toi, Masakazu
    Togashi, Kaori
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 20 (02) : 204 - 215
  • [32] Diffusion tensor imaging of the optic chiasm in patients with intra- or parasellar tumor using readout-segmented echo-planar
    Yamada, Hirofumi
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Okada, Tomohisa
    Kanagaki, Mitsunori
    Fushimi, Yasutaka
    Porter, David A.
    Tanji, Masahiro
    Hojo, Masato
    Miyamoto, Susumu
    Togashi, Kaori
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 34 (05) : 654 - 661
  • [33] Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted MR imaging of acute infarction of the brainstem and posterior fossa: comparison of single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences
    Byeon, Jonghyun
    Kim, Jee Young
    Cho, A-Hyun
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (05) : 765 - 769
  • [34] High Resolution Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging, Parallel Imaging and a Two-Dimensional Navigator-Based Reacquisition
    Porter, David A.
    Heidemann, Robin M.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 62 (02) : 468 - 475
  • [35] Head and neck masses: Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging
    Wang, J
    Takashima, S
    Takayama, F
    Wang, Q
    Kawakami, S
    Saito, A
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 473 - 473
  • [36] Usefulness of free-breathing readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE) for detection of malignant liver tumors: Comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI)
    Tokoro, Hirokazu
    Fujinaga, Yasunari
    Ohya, Ayumi
    Ueda, Kazuhiko
    Shiobara, Aya
    Kitou, Yoshihiro
    Ueda, Hitoshi
    Kadoya, Masumi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (10) : 1728 - 1733
  • [37] Comparison of DWI Methods in the Pediatric Brain: PROPELLER Turbo Spin-Echo Imaging Versus Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging Versus Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging
    Kim, Tae-Hyung
    Baek, Moon-Young
    Park, Ji Eun
    Ryu, Young Jin
    Cheon, Jung-Eun
    Kim, In-One
    Choi, Young Hun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (06) : 1352 - 1358
  • [38] Comparison of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging and Single-Shot TSE DWI for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics
    Wiesmueller, M.
    Wuest, W.
    May, M. S.
    Ellmann, S.
    Heiss, R.
    Saake, M.
    Janka, R.
    Uder, M.
    Laun, F. B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (07) : 1305 - 1312
  • [39] \Feasibility of high-resolution readout-segmented echo-planar imaging with simultaneous multislice imaging in assessing rectal cancer
    Huang, Hongyun
    Zhou, Mi
    Gong, Tong
    Wang, Yuting
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (07) : 2258 - 2269
  • [40] Feasibility of high-resolution readout-segmented echo-planar imaging with simultaneous multislice imaging in assessing rectal cancer
    Hongyun Huang
    Mi Zhou
    Tong Gong
    Yuting Wang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2258 - 2269