Utility of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging-Based Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Differentiating Malignant from Benign Masses in Head and Neck Region

被引:14
|
作者
Ma, Gao [1 ]
Xu, Xiao-Quan [1 ]
Hu, Hao [1 ]
Su, Guo-Yi [1 ]
Shen, Jie [1 ]
Shi, Hai-Bin [1 ]
Wu, Fei-Yun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Head and neck; Differentiation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Diffusion kurtosis imaging; Tumor; Neoplasm; Imaging biomarker; PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE; COEFFICIENT VALUES; SINONASAL LESIONS; PROSTATE-CANCER; BREAST-LESIONS; CARCINOMA; FEASIBILITY; QUALITY; MODEL; MRI;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2018.19.3.443
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RS-EPI)-based diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and that of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating malignant from benign masses in head and neck region. Materials and Methods: Between December 2014 and April 2016, we retrospectively enrolled 72 consecutive patients with head and neck masses who had undergone RS-EPI-based DKI scan (b value of 0, 500, 1000, and 1500 s/mm(2)) for pretreatment evaluation. Imaging data were post-processed by using monoexponential and diffusion kurtosis (DK) model for quantitation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), apparent diffusion for Gaussian distribution (D-app), and apparent kurtosis coefficient (K-app). Unpaired t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare differences of quantitative parameters between malignant and benign groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to determine and compare the diagnostic ability of quantitative parameters in predicting malignancy. Results: Malignant group demonstrated significantly lower ADC (0.754 +/- 0.167 vs. 1.222 +/- 0.420, p < 0.001) and Dapp (1.029 +/- 0.226 vs. 1.640 +/- 0.445, p < 0.001) while higher Kapp (1.344 +/- 0.309 vs. 0.715 +/- 0.249, p < 0.001) than benign group. Using a combination of Dapp and Kapp as diagnostic index, significantly better differentiating performance was achieved than using ADC alone (area under curve: 0.956 vs. 0.876, p = 0.042). Conclusion: Compared to DWI, DKI could provide additional data related to tumor heterogeneity with significantly better differentiating performance. Its derived quantitative metrics could serve as a promising imaging biomarker for differentiating malignant from benign masses in head and neck region.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 451
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-guided MR Spectroscopy in Breast Lesions using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
    Sun, Kun
    Chai, Weimin
    Fu, Caixia
    Zhan, Ying
    Shen, Kunwei
    Luo, Xianfu
    Yan, Fuhua
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (06) : 1565 - 1574
  • [22] Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brachial Plexus: A Comparison between Readout-segmented and Conventional Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging
    Ho, Michael J.
    Ciritsis, Alexander
    Manoliu, Andrei
    Stieltjes, Bram
    Marcon, Magda
    Andreisek, Gustav
    Kuhn, Felix Pierre
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 18 (02) : 150 - 157
  • [23] Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of sinonasal lesions: A comprehensive comparison of image quality in single-shot echo-planar imaging
    Zhao, Menglong
    Liu, Zhuang
    Sha, Yan
    Wang, Shenjiang
    Ye, Xinpei
    Pan, Yucheng
    Wang, Shaoyu
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 34 (02) : 166 - 172
  • [24] Comparing the clinical utility of single-shot, readout-segmented and zoomit echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney at 3 T
    Wenguang Liu
    Hui Liu
    Simin xie
    Ismail Bilal Masokano
    Yu Bai
    Xiao Wang
    Linhui Zhong
    Yi Wu
    Jilin Nie
    Gaofeng Zhou
    Yigang Pei
    Wenzheng Li
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [25] Preoperative Localization of Parathyroid Adenomas with Diffusion MR Imaging: Readout-segmented versus Single-shot Echo-planar Imaging
    Yamamoto, Hirotaka
    Iima, Mami
    Kishimoto, Yo
    Kishimoto, Ayami Ohno
    Koyasu, Sho
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Kawai, Yoshitaka
    Yoshizawa, Akira
    Omori, Koichi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 22 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [26] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-guided MR Spectroscopy in Breast Lesions using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
    Kun Sun
    Weimin Chai
    Caixia Fu
    Ying Zhan
    Kunwei Shen
    Xianfu Luo
    Fuhua Yan
    European Radiology, 2016, 26 : 1565 - 1574
  • [27] Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
    Fu, Qing
    Kong, Xiang-chuang
    Liu, Ding-Xi
    Zhou, Kun
    Guo, Yi-hao
    Lei, Zi-Qiao
    Zheng, Chuan-sheng
    Yang, Fan
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [28] Improve the image quality of orbital 3 T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging
    Xu, Xiao-Quan
    Liu, Jun
    Hu, Hao
    Su, Guo-Yi
    Zhang, Yu-Dong
    Shi, Hai-Bin
    Wu, Fei-Yun
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (04) : 793 - 796
  • [29] Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of orbital tumors: comparison with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality and diagnostic performance
    Xu, Xiaoquan
    Wang, Yanjun
    Hu, Hao
    Su, Guoyi
    Liu, Hu
    Shi, Haibin
    Wu, Feiyun
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2017, 58 (12) : 1457 - 1467
  • [30] Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the image quality of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in rectal cancer: Comparison with single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences
    Xia, Chun-chao
    Liu, Xi
    Peng, Wan-lin
    Li, Lei
    Zhang, Jin-ge
    Meng, Wen-jian
    Deng, Xiang-bing
    Zuo, Pan-li
    Li, Zhen-lin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (10) : 1818 - 1823