Long-term followup of and patient satisfaction with the dynaflex self-contained inflatable penile prosthesis

被引:10
|
作者
Kabalin, JN
Kuo, JC
机构
[1] Urology Section, Palo Alto Vet. Aff. Hlth. Care Syst., Palo Alto, CA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1997年 / 158卷 / 02期
关键词
penis; penile prosthesis; penile erection; impotence;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64500-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We analyzed our experience with the Dynaflex* self-contained inflatable penile prosthesis to define specific complication rates and patient satisfaction in the long term. Materials and Methods: From October 1990 through October 1994, 62 men underwent implantation of a Dynaflex prosthesis. Mean and median time since implantation was 50 and 53 months, respectively (minimum 24). In addition to standard followup and tabulation of complications, patients were contacted and interviewed regarding satisfaction with the prosthesis. Results: Mechanical device failures occurred in 9.7% of cases with a mean time to failure of 40 months in 6 prostheses. An additional 16.1% of patients had an unsuccessful outcome due to dissatisfaction with the Dynaflex. Of the patients with a functional Dynaflex prosthesis contacted at the time of this review 88.1% expressed satisfaction. Conclusions: Mechanical failure rates for the Dynaflex prosthesis are comparable to those previously reported for multicomponent inflatable penile prostheses. Patient dissatisfaction, mainly due to difficulty in operating the Dynaflex inflation and deflation mechanisms, is much higher than for multicomponent inflatable penile prostheses. However, in patients who are successful in mastering operation of the Dynaflex satisfaction rates are high. Careful patient selection, and extended training and education efforts are the keys to maximizing successful outcomes with the Dynaflex prosthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 459
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700 CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis
    Dhar, N
    Angermeier, KW
    Montague, D
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 423 - 423
  • [22] THE AMS 700 INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS - LONG-TERM EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONTROLLED EXPANSION CYLINDERS
    QUESADA, ET
    LIGHT, JK
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 149 (01): : 46 - 48
  • [23] LONG-TERM RELIABILITY OF AMS 700CX/CXM INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS
    Kim, D. S.
    Yang, K. M.
    Choi, H. M.
    Chung, H. J.
    Choi, H. K.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2010, 7 : 100 - 100
  • [24] Excellent long-term device survival of inflatable penile prosthesis over 27 years
    Moncada, Ignacio
    Krishnappa, Pramod
    Martinez-Salamanca, Juan Ignacio
    Palma-Hendges, Luiz Pedro
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Francisco Javier
    Hernandez-Fernandez, Carlos
    Lledo-Garcia, Enrique
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2025,
  • [25] LONG-TERM COMPLETE OUTCOMES OF CONCURRENT TACHOSIL GRAFTING WITH INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS PLACEMENT
    Ring, J.
    Patel, N.
    Gupta, N.
    Wymer, K.
    Hatzichristodoulou, G.
    Kohler, T.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (04): : S58 - S58
  • [26] Long-term mechanical reliability of multicomponent inflatable penile prosthesis: Comparison of device survival
    Dubocq, F
    Tefilli, MV
    Gheiler, EL
    Li, HK
    Dhabuwala, CB
    UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (02) : 277 - 281
  • [27] LONG-TERM EXPERIENCE WITH CONTROLLED EXPANSION CYLINDERS IN THE AMS 700CX INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS AND COMPARISON WITH EARLIER VERSIONS OF THE SCOTT INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS
    NICKAS, ME
    KESSLER, R
    KABALIN, JN
    UROLOGY, 1994, 44 (03) : 400 - 403
  • [28] Does a replacement or revision of an inflatable penile prosthesis lead to decreased patient satisfaction?
    A A Caire
    A Boonjindasup
    W J G Hellstrom
    International Journal of Impotence Research, 2011, 23 : 39 - 42
  • [29] SUB-CORONAL INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS PLACEMENT: PATIENT SATISFACTION AND OUTCOMES
    Feng, C.
    Langbo, W.
    Anderson, L.
    Cao, D.
    Bajic, D.
    Amarasekera, C.
    Levine, L.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (04): : S88 - S89
  • [30] DOES THE NEED FOR A REPLACEMENT INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS LEAD TO DECREASED PATIENT SATISFACTION?
    Caire, Arthur
    Boonjindasup, Aaron
    Richardson, Brian
    Hellstrom, Wayne
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E369 - E369