Declining Revision Burden of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties

被引:18
|
作者
Lainiala, Olli S. [1 ,2 ]
Reito, Aleksi P. [1 ,2 ]
Nieminen, Jyrki J. [1 ,2 ]
Eskelinen, Antti P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Coxa Hosp Joint Replacement, POB 652, Tampere 33101, Finland
[2] Univ Tampere, Fac Med & Hlth Technol, Tampere, Finland
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2019年 / 34卷 / 09期
关键词
metal-on-metal; total hip arthroplasty; hip resurfacing; revision; adverse reaction to metal debris; PSEUDOTUMORS; FAILURE; BEARINGS; REPLACEMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.058
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) have been a problem with metal-on-metal (MoM) hip systems for a decade. Unacceptably high revision rates have been described for both stemmed MoM total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and hip resurfacings. The aim of this study was to report survivorship and temporal trends of hip revisions in patients with MoM hips. Methods: We identified 2520 patients with 3013 MoM hip arthroplasties performed at our institution. These included 1532 primary stemmed MoM THAs, 1262 MoM hip resurfacings, and 219 stemmed MoM THAs implanted in revision surgery. Results: Revision surgery was performed on 551 (36%) primary stemmed MoM THAs and on 179 (14%) resurfacings. The most common reason for revision was ARMD both among primary MoM THAs (83%) and hip resurfacings (70%). The 15-year implant survivorship was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67-71%) for the whole study group, 56% (CI 53-60%) for stemmed primary MoM THAs, and 84% (CI 82-87%) for hip resurfacings. Clear temporal peak in the number of revisions for ARMD was seen in 2011-2013, and the trend has been decreasing since. Conclusion: After a decade since outburst of the ARMD problematics with MoM hips, a large proportion of them have gone through revision surgery at our single high-volume center. The peak years were 2011-2013, and thereafter, the number of ARMD revisions has decreased every year. With the threshold for revision remaining constant at our institution, it is not likely that large amount of new cases of ARMD will be seen. As these results are derived from a single center's data, similar studies from other institutions are needed to see whether our results represent a global trend. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2058 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Metal allergy and second-generation metal-on-metal arthroplasties
    Cousen, Philippa J.
    Gawkrodger, David J.
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2012, 66 (02) : 55 - 62
  • [42] Wear performance of retrieved metal-on-metal Pinnacle hip arthroplasties implanted before and after 2007
    Bergiers, S.
    Hothl, H. S.
    Henckel, J.
    Eskelinen, A.
    Skinner, J.
    Hart, A.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (11): : 595 - 600
  • [43] Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing
    Quesada, Mario J.
    Marker, David R.
    Mont, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (07): : 69 - 73
  • [44] Sequelae of large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: current status and future prospects
    van Lingen, Christiaan P.
    Zagra, Luigi M.
    Ettema, Harmen B.
    Verheyen, Cees C.
    [J]. EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2016, 1 (10): : 345 - 353
  • [45] Femoral Revision in Hip Resurfacing Compared With Large-Bearing Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty
    Garrett, Simon J. W.
    Bolland, Ben J. R. F.
    Yates, Piers J.
    Gardner, Edward M. H.
    Latham, Jeremy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (08): : 1214 - 1218
  • [46] Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
    Roberts, J
    Meek, RMD
    Roberts, P
    Grigoris, P
    [J]. SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 50 (01) : 10 - 12
  • [47] Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
    Ebied, A
    Journeaux, S
    [J]. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDICS, 2002, 16 (06): : 420 - 425
  • [48] Metal ion levels and revision rates in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study
    Robinson, Patrick G.
    Wilkinson, Andrew J.
    Meek, Robert M. D.
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 24 (02) : 123 - 128
  • [49] Outcome of revision arthroplasty for failed metal-on-metal total hip replacements; is there a relation with metal ions?
    Iqbal, Hafiz J.
    Al-Azzani, Waheeb A. K.
    Jackson-Taylor, Esther
    Clatworthy, Elizabeth
    John, Alun
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 27 (03) : 235 - 240
  • [50] Comparison of Harris Hip Scores and Revision Rates in Metal-on-Metal Versus Non-Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Frisch, Nicholas B.
    Rahman, Tahsin M.
    Darrith, Brian
    Patel, Ishan
    Silverton, Craig D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (10) : E422 - E426