Supplemental Instruction Online: As Effective as the Traditional Face-to-Face Model?

被引:11
|
作者
Hizer, Suzanne E. [1 ]
Schultz, P. W. [1 ]
Bray, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ San Marcos, 333 S Twin Oaks Valley Rd, San Marcos, CA 92096 USA
关键词
Supplemental Instruction; Biology; Higher education; Online; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10956-016-9655-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Supplemental Instruction (SI) is a well-recognized model of academic assistance with a history of empirical evidence demonstrating increases in student grades and decreases in failure rates across many higher education institutions. However, as college students become more accustomed to learning in online venues, what is not known is whether an SI program offered online could benefit students similarly to SI sessions that occur in face-to-face settings. The in-person (traditional) SI program at California State University San Marcos has demonstrated increases in grades and lower fail rates for courses being supported in science and math. Students enrolled in four biology courses who participated in online SI received increases in academic performance similar to the students in the courses who attended traditional SI. Both the online and traditional SI participating students had higher course grades and lower fail rates as compared to students who did not participate in either form of SI. Self-selection, as measured by past cumulative college grade point average, did not differ between students who attended either form of SI or who did not attend. Student perceptions of online SI were generally positive and appeared to offer an alternative path to receive this valuable academic assistance for some students. Overall, results are promising that the highly effective traditional model can be translated to an online environment.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:100 / 115
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Online intravenous pump emulator: As effective as face-to-face simulation for training nursing students
    Terry, Victoria R.
    Moloney, Clint
    Bowtell, Leslie
    Terry, Peter C.
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2016, 40 : 198 - 203
  • [42] Social work students and their learning environment: A comparison of interactive television, face-to-face instruction, and the traditional classroom
    Petracchi, HE
    Patchner, MA
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2000, 36 (02) : 335 - 346
  • [43] Is Online Group Therapy as Effective as Face-to-face Group Therapy? A Mixed Methods Study
    Zhang, Ji
    Hu, Huinan
    Wu, Dazhou
    Nie, Yuxiu
    Lin, Xiuyun
    CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [44] Connectivity: A Framework for Understanding Effective Language Teaching in Face-to-face and Online Learning Communities
    Senior, Rose
    RELC JOURNAL, 2010, 41 (02) : 137 - 147
  • [45] FACE-TO-FACE SELLING - MAKING IT MORE EFFECTIVE
    WITHEY, JJ
    PANITZ, E
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 1995, 24 (04) : 239 - 246
  • [46] Transit Traditional Face-to-Face Teaching to Online Teaching during the Outbreak of COVID-2019
    Wan, Han
    Tang, Lina
    Zhong, Zihao
    Cao, Qinghua
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING, ASSESSMENT, AND LEARNING FOR ENGINEERING (IEEE TALE 2020), 2020, : 355 - 362
  • [48] A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach
    Todd, E. Michelle
    Watts, Logan L.
    Mulhearn, Tyler J.
    Torrence, Brett S.
    Turner, Megan R.
    Connelly, Shane
    Mumford, Michael D.
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2017, 23 (06) : 1719 - 1754
  • [49] Blended learning approach in teacher education: combining face-to-face instruction, multimedia viewing and online discussion
    Khine, MS
    Lourdusamy, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 34 (05) : 671 - 675
  • [50] A comparison of online versus face-to-face teaching delivery in statistics instruction for undergraduate health science students
    Fletcher Lu
    Manon Lemonde
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2013, 18 : 963 - 973