Supplemental Instruction Online: As Effective as the Traditional Face-to-Face Model?

被引:11
|
作者
Hizer, Suzanne E. [1 ]
Schultz, P. W. [1 ]
Bray, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ San Marcos, 333 S Twin Oaks Valley Rd, San Marcos, CA 92096 USA
关键词
Supplemental Instruction; Biology; Higher education; Online; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10956-016-9655-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Supplemental Instruction (SI) is a well-recognized model of academic assistance with a history of empirical evidence demonstrating increases in student grades and decreases in failure rates across many higher education institutions. However, as college students become more accustomed to learning in online venues, what is not known is whether an SI program offered online could benefit students similarly to SI sessions that occur in face-to-face settings. The in-person (traditional) SI program at California State University San Marcos has demonstrated increases in grades and lower fail rates for courses being supported in science and math. Students enrolled in four biology courses who participated in online SI received increases in academic performance similar to the students in the courses who attended traditional SI. Both the online and traditional SI participating students had higher course grades and lower fail rates as compared to students who did not participate in either form of SI. Self-selection, as measured by past cumulative college grade point average, did not differ between students who attended either form of SI or who did not attend. Student perceptions of online SI were generally positive and appeared to offer an alternative path to receive this valuable academic assistance for some students. Overall, results are promising that the highly effective traditional model can be translated to an online environment.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:100 / 115
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MBTI personality type and other factors that relate to preference for online versus face-to-face instruction
    Harrington, Rick
    Loffredo, Donald A.
    INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (1-2): : 89 - 95
  • [32] Comparison of online to face-to-face instruction for anatomy review in a third-year clinical course
    Faydenko, Jocelyn
    Grieve, Thomas
    Madigan, Dana
    Pocius, Judith D.
    Olsen, Christopher
    Cramer, Gregory D.
    JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC EDUCATION, 2024, 38 (01): : 23 - 29
  • [33] Sustainable Math Education of Female Students during a Pandemic: Online versus Face-to-Face Instruction
    AbdelSalam, Hanadi Mohamed
    Pilotti, Maura A. E.
    El-Moussa, Omar J.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [34] Comparison of Online to Face-To-Face Instruction for Anatomy Review in a Third-Year Clinical Course
    Cramer, Gregory
    Grieve, Thomas
    Madigan, Dana
    Pocius, Judith
    Olsen, Christopher
    Faydenko, Jocelyn
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2021, 35
  • [35] Trust and Understanding in Face-to-Face and Online Negotiations
    van der Toorn, Yvonne
    van der Wijst, Per
    Damen, Debby
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS IV - INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN DECISION PROCESSES, 2015, 221 : 37 - 50
  • [36] FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE TUTORING - A DIFFERENT EXPERIENCE
    HARDY, V
    TELETEACHING, 1993, 29 : 339 - 344
  • [37] Face-to-face or online psychoanalytical therapy and supervision?
    Cai, Yanyu
    Zhu, Qianwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 275 - 275
  • [38] ONLINE BEHANDELENVan face-to-face naar digitaal
    Marsha Baboelal
    TvPO, 2021, 16 (2) : 10 - 12
  • [39] FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE INTERACTIONS - IS A TASK A TASK?
    Duensing, Annette
    Stickler, Ursula
    Batstone, Carolyn
    Heins, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING DESIGN, 2006, 1 (02): : 35 - 45
  • [40] AN EXAMINATION OF THE INTERACTIONS IN FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE TUTORIALS
    Eleftheriou, M.
    Ahmed, F.
    7TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2013), 2013,