Supplemental Instruction Online: As Effective as the Traditional Face-to-Face Model?

被引:11
|
作者
Hizer, Suzanne E. [1 ]
Schultz, P. W. [1 ]
Bray, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ San Marcos, 333 S Twin Oaks Valley Rd, San Marcos, CA 92096 USA
关键词
Supplemental Instruction; Biology; Higher education; Online; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10956-016-9655-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Supplemental Instruction (SI) is a well-recognized model of academic assistance with a history of empirical evidence demonstrating increases in student grades and decreases in failure rates across many higher education institutions. However, as college students become more accustomed to learning in online venues, what is not known is whether an SI program offered online could benefit students similarly to SI sessions that occur in face-to-face settings. The in-person (traditional) SI program at California State University San Marcos has demonstrated increases in grades and lower fail rates for courses being supported in science and math. Students enrolled in four biology courses who participated in online SI received increases in academic performance similar to the students in the courses who attended traditional SI. Both the online and traditional SI participating students had higher course grades and lower fail rates as compared to students who did not participate in either form of SI. Self-selection, as measured by past cumulative college grade point average, did not differ between students who attended either form of SI or who did not attend. Student perceptions of online SI were generally positive and appeared to offer an alternative path to receive this valuable academic assistance for some students. Overall, results are promising that the highly effective traditional model can be translated to an online environment.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:100 / 115
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supplemental Instruction Online: As Effective as the Traditional Face-to-Face Model?
    Suzanne E. Hizer
    P. W. Schultz
    Richard Bray
    Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2017, 26 : 100 - 115
  • [2] Evaluating the cost effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction
    Bartley, SJ
    Golek, JH
    EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2004, 7 (04): : 167 - 175
  • [3] The challenges of interfacing between face-to-face and online instruction
    Nada H. Dabbagh
    TechTrends, 2000, 44 (6) : 37 - 42
  • [4] Using Online learning in a traditional face-to-face environment
    Kozlowski, D
    COMPUTERS IN NURSING, 2002, 20 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [5] BORROWING FROM ONLINE ENVIRONMENTS: APPLICATIONS FOR FACE-TO-FACE INSTRUCTION
    Wright, Beverly
    Marketing Dynamism & Sustainability-Things Change, Things Stay the Same..., 2015, : 69 - 69
  • [6] Online Graduate Students' Perceptions of Face-to-Face Classroom Instruction
    Keengwe, Jared
    Wilsey, Biljana Belamaric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2012, 8 (03) : 45 - 54
  • [7] Online CME: an effective alternative to face-to-face delivery
    Ryan, Greg
    Lyon, Patricia
    Kumar, Koshila
    Bell, James
    Barnet, Stewart
    Shaw, Tim
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (08) : E251 - E257
  • [8] An Organizational Model of Online Learning in the Pandemic Period: Comparison with Traditional Face-to-Face Learning
    Checa-Morales, Cristina
    De-Pablos-Heredero, Carmen
    Diaz Ocampo, Eduardo
    Guiselli Torres, Yenny
    Garcia, Anton
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [9] Computer-mediated instruction: a comparison of online and face-to-face collaboration
    Jeremy I. Tutty
    James D. Klein
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 2008, 56 : 507 - 507
  • [10] Comparing the Effectiveness of an Online Human Diversity Course to Face-to-Face instruction
    Stauss, Kimberly
    Koh, Eun
    Collie, Michael
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2018, 54 (03) : 492 - 505