A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology

被引:51
|
作者
Luke, Barbara [1 ]
Brown, Morton B. [2 ]
Wantman, Ethan [3 ]
Stern, Judy E. [4 ]
Baker, Valerie L. [5 ]
Widra, Eric [6 ]
Coddington, Charles C., III [7 ]
Gibbons, William E. [8 ]
Ball, G. David [9 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Reprod Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Redshift Technol, New York, NY USA
[4] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lebanon, NH USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[6] Shady Grove Fertil Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN USA
[8] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[9] Seattle Reprod Med, Seattle, WA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Assisted reproductive technology; BMI; donor cycle; prediction model; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; LINKED CYCLES; RATES; PREGNANCY; ART;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.020
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a model predictive of live-birth rates (LBR) and multiple birth rates (MBR) for an individual considering assisted reproduction technology (ART) using linked cycles from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) for 2004-2011. Design: Longitudinal cohort. Setting: Clinic-based data. Patient(s): 288,161 women with an initial autologous cycle, of whom 89,855 did not become pregnant and had a second autologous cycle and 39,334 did not become pregnant in the first and second cycles and had a third autologous cycle, with an additional 33,598 women who had a cycle using donor oocytes (first donor cycle). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): LBRs and MBRs modeled by woman's age, body mass index, gravidity, prior full-term births, infertility diagnoses by oocyte source, fresh embryos transferred, and cycle, using backward-stepping logistic regression with results presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs)and 95% confidence intervals. Result(s): The LBRs increased in all models with prior full-term births, number of embryos transferred; in autologous cycles also with gravidity, diagnoses of male factor, and ovulation disorders; and in donor cycles also with the diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve. The MBR increased in all models with number of embryos transferred and in donor cycles also with prior full-term births. For both autologous and donor cycles, transferring two versus one embryo greatly increased the probability of a multiple birth (AOR 27.25 and 38.90, respectively). Conclusion(s): This validated predictive model will be implemented on the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Web site (www.sart.org) so that patients considering initiating a course of ART can input their data on the Web site to generate their expected outcomes. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 752
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Kulkarni, Aniket D.
    Mneimneh, Allison
    Warner, Lee
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Crawford, Sara
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (04) : 954 - 961
  • [42] BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF FIRST BIRTH POSTPONEMENT AND ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY ON COMPLETED FERTILITY
    Leridon, Henri
    POPULATION, 2017, 72 (03): : 463 - 490
  • [43] Down syndrome live births following assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a nationwide survey between 2007 and 2016
    Jwa, Seung Chik
    Namba, Akira
    Tamaru, Shunsuke
    Kuwahara, Akira
    Sago, Haruhiko
    Ishihara, Osamu
    Kamei, Yoshimasa
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2022, 39 (07) : 1625 - 1631
  • [44] Does duration of abstinence affect the live-birth rate after assisted reproductive technology? A retrospective analysis of 1,030 cycles
    Periyasamy, Anurekha J.
    Mahasampath, Gowri
    Karthikeyan, Muthukumar
    Mangalaraj, Ann M.
    Kunjummen, Aleyamma T.
    Kamath, Mohan S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (06) : 988 - 992
  • [45] Down syndrome live births following assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a nationwide survey between 2007 and 2016
    Seung Chik Jwa
    Akira Namba
    Shunsuke Tamaru
    Akira Kuwahara
    Haruhiko Sago
    Osamu Ishihara
    Yoshimasa Kamei
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 1625 - 1631
  • [46] Age-Related Increase in Live-Birth Rates of First Frozen Thaw Embryo Compared With First Fresh Transfer in Initial Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles Without Preimplantation Genetic Testing
    Wang, Sarah
    Seifer, David B.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 143 (5S): : 27S - 28S
  • [47] Can endometrial compaction predict live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates in assisted reproductive technology cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Turkgeldi, E.
    Kalafat, E.
    Yildiz, S.
    Keles, I.
    Ata, B.
    Bozdag, G.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [48] Calculating cumulative live-birth rates from linked cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART): data from the Massachusetts SART CORS
    Stern, Judy E.
    Brown, Morton B.
    Luke, Barbara
    Wantman, Ethan
    Lederman, Avi
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    Hornstein, Mark D.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : 1334 - 1340
  • [49] Insurance is not a magic bullet for the multiple birth problem associated with assisted reproductive technology
    Reynolds, MA
    Schieve, LA
    Peterson, HB
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (01) : 32 - 33
  • [50] CDC REPORTED ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (ART) LIVE BIRTH RATES ARE MISLEADING TO THE PUBLIC.
    Kushnir, V. A.
    Choi, J.
    Darmon, S.
    Albertini, D.
    Barad, D. H.
    Gleicher, N.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E333 - E333