A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology

被引:51
|
作者
Luke, Barbara [1 ]
Brown, Morton B. [2 ]
Wantman, Ethan [3 ]
Stern, Judy E. [4 ]
Baker, Valerie L. [5 ]
Widra, Eric [6 ]
Coddington, Charles C., III [7 ]
Gibbons, William E. [8 ]
Ball, G. David [9 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Reprod Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Redshift Technol, New York, NY USA
[4] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lebanon, NH USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[6] Shady Grove Fertil Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN USA
[8] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[9] Seattle Reprod Med, Seattle, WA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Assisted reproductive technology; BMI; donor cycle; prediction model; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; LINKED CYCLES; RATES; PREGNANCY; ART;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.020
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a model predictive of live-birth rates (LBR) and multiple birth rates (MBR) for an individual considering assisted reproduction technology (ART) using linked cycles from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) for 2004-2011. Design: Longitudinal cohort. Setting: Clinic-based data. Patient(s): 288,161 women with an initial autologous cycle, of whom 89,855 did not become pregnant and had a second autologous cycle and 39,334 did not become pregnant in the first and second cycles and had a third autologous cycle, with an additional 33,598 women who had a cycle using donor oocytes (first donor cycle). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): LBRs and MBRs modeled by woman's age, body mass index, gravidity, prior full-term births, infertility diagnoses by oocyte source, fresh embryos transferred, and cycle, using backward-stepping logistic regression with results presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs)and 95% confidence intervals. Result(s): The LBRs increased in all models with prior full-term births, number of embryos transferred; in autologous cycles also with gravidity, diagnoses of male factor, and ovulation disorders; and in donor cycles also with the diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve. The MBR increased in all models with number of embryos transferred and in donor cycles also with prior full-term births. For both autologous and donor cycles, transferring two versus one embryo greatly increased the probability of a multiple birth (AOR 27.25 and 38.90, respectively). Conclusion(s): This validated predictive model will be implemented on the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Web site (www.sart.org) so that patients considering initiating a course of ART can input their data on the Web site to generate their expected outcomes. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 752
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] STATE OF THE ART: AN UPDATE ON AVAILABLE ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR PRODUCING LIVE BIRTHS IN THE RHESUS MACAQUE
    Hanna, Carrie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2023, 85
  • [23] Live birth is not the only relevant outcome in research assessing assisted reproductive technology
    Wang, Zheng
    Cantineau, Astrid E. P.
    Hoek, Annemieke
    van Eekelen, Rik
    Mol, Ben W.
    Wang, Rui
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 86
  • [24] LIVE BIRTH RATES AFTER ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY: HOW SHOULD THEY BE REPORTED?
    Luke, B.
    Brown, M. B.
    Lederman, A.
    Wantman, E.
    Stern, J. E.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S192 - S192
  • [25] Can endometrial compaction predict live birth rates in assisted reproductive technology cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Turkgeldi, E.
    Yildiz, S.
    Kalafat, E.
    Keles, I.
    Ata, B.
    Bozdag, G.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2023, 40 (11) : 2513 - 2522
  • [26] Can endometrial compaction predict live birth rates in assisted reproductive technology cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    E. Turkgeldi
    S Yildiz
    E. Kalafat
    I. Keles
    B. Ata
    G. Bozdag
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023, 40 : 2513 - 2522
  • [27] Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology pregnancy and live birth rates within body mass index categories
    Luke, Barbara
    Brown, Morton B.
    Stern, Judy E.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    Fujimoto, Victor Y.
    Leach, Richard
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (05) : 1661 - 1666
  • [28] Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology
    Luke, Barbara
    Brown, Morton B.
    Stern, Judy E.
    Jindal, Sangita K.
    Racowsky, Catherine
    Ball, G. David
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (05) : 1338 - 1344
  • [29] A PREDICTION MODEL FOR LIVE BIRTH FOLLOWING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY USING UNITED STATES NATIONAL SURVEILLANCE DATA FROM 2016-2018.
    Gaskins, Audrey J.
    Zhang, Yujia
    Chang, Jeani
    Liao, Kuo J.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (03) : E231 - E231
  • [30] Age-related increase in live-birth rates of first frozen thaw embryo versus first fresh transfer in initial assisted reproductive technology cycles without PGT
    Wang, Sarah F.
    Seifer, David B.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)