Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PELF-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma

被引:11
|
作者
Ruf, Catharina [1 ]
Thomusch, Oliver [1 ]
Goos, Matthias [1 ]
Makowiec, Frank [1 ]
Illerhaus, Gerald [2 ]
Ruf, Guenther [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Univ Klinikum, Dept Surg, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Dept Oncol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; PELF; Advanced gastric cancer; HELICOBACTER-PYLORI INFECTION; PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER; ADENOCARCINOMA; EXPRESSION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2482-14-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In a retrospective study we analyzed the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) with the PELF - protocol (Cisplatin, Epirubicin, Leukovorin, 5-Fluoruracil) on mortality, recurrence and prognosis of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, UICC stages Ib-III. Methods: 64 patients were included. 26 patients received neoadjuvant CTx followed by surgical resection, 38 received surgical resection only. Tumor staging was performed by endoscopy, endosonography, computed tomography and laparoscopy. Patients staged Ib - III received two cycles of CTx according to the PELF-protocol. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not performed at all. Results: Complete (CR) or partial response (PR) was seen in 20 patients (77%), 19% showing CR and 58% PR. No benefit was observed in 6 patients (23%). Two of these 6 patients displayed tumor progression during CTx. Major toxicity was defined as grade 3 to 4 neutropenia or gastrointestinal side effects. One patient died under CTx because of neutropenia and was excluded from the overall patient collective. The curative resection rate was 77% after CTx and 74% after surgery only. The perioperative morbidity rate after CTx was 39% versus 66% after resection only. Recurrence rate after CTx was 38% and 61% after surgery alone; we detected an effective reduction of locoregional recurrence (12% vs. 26%). The overall survival was 38% after CTx and 42% after resection only. The 5-year survival rates were 45% in responders, 20% in non - responders and 42% in only resected patients. A subgroup analysis indicates that responders with stage III tumors may benefit with respect to their 5-year survival in comparable patients without neoadjuvant CTx. As to be expected, non-responders with stage III tumors did not benefit with respect to their survival. The 5-year-survival was approximated using a Kaplan-Meier curve and compared using a log-rank test. Conclusion: In patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, neoadjuvant CTx with the PELF-protocol significantly reduces the recurrence rate, especially locoregionally, compared to surgery alone. In our study, there was no overall survival benefit after a 5-year follow-up period. Alone a subgroup of patients with stage III tumors appear to benefit significantly in the long term from neoadjuvant CTx.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the treatment of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma
    Kim, KH
    Sung, MW
    Rhee, CS
    Koo, JW
    Koh, TY
    Lee, DW
    Heo, DS
    Park, CI
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1998, 19 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [32] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in locally advanced cervical carcinoma
    Duenas-Gonzalez, A
    Lopez-Graniel, CM
    Mota, A
    Mohar, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (12) : 2908 - 2909
  • [33] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma
    Kayikçioglu, F
    Köse, MF
    Boran, N
    Çaliskan, E
    Tulunay, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2001, 11 (06) : 466 - 470
  • [34] Advanced endometrial carcinoma: primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
    Guyon, Frederic
    Stoeckle, Eberhard
    Thomas, Laurence
    Petit, Adeline
    Sire, Marie
    Floquet, Anne
    [J]. BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2012, 99 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [36] Comparison of postoperative complications in advanced head and neck cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone
    Joshi, Poonam
    Joshi, Amit
    Prabhash, Kumar
    Noronha, Vanita
    Chaturvedi, Pankaj
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 36 (04) : 249 - 254
  • [37] Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery Versus Radical Surgery Alone in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients
    Gong, Lin
    Zhang, Jia-Wen
    Yin, Ru-Tie
    Wang, Ping
    Liu, Hui
    Zheng, Ying
    Lou, Jiang-Yan
    Peng, Zhi-Lan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 (04) : 722 - 728
  • [38] Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter randomized phase 2 trial
    Jian-Xian Lin
    Yi-Hui Tang
    Hua-Long Zheng
    Kai Ye
    Jian-Chun Cai
    Li-Sheng Cai
    Wei Lin
    Jian-Wei Xie
    Jia-Bin Wang
    Jun Lu
    Qi-Yue Chen
    Long-Long Cao
    Chao-Hui Zheng
    Ping Li
    Chang-Ming Huang
    [J]. Nature Communications, 15 (1)
  • [39] Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter randomized phase 2 trial
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Tang, Yi-Hui
    Zheng, Hua-Long
    Ye, Kai
    Cai, Jian-Chun
    Cai, Li-Sheng
    Lin, Wei
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-Bin
    Lu, Jun
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Cao, Long-Long
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Li, Ping
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [40] Primary chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery as treatment strategy for locally advanced vulvar carcinoma (VULCANize2)
    Amant, Frederic
    van Velzen, Anne Fleur
    Reyners, An
    Zijlmans, Henry
    Schaake, Eva E.
    Nooij, Linda
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024,