Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PELF-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma

被引:11
|
作者
Ruf, Catharina [1 ]
Thomusch, Oliver [1 ]
Goos, Matthias [1 ]
Makowiec, Frank [1 ]
Illerhaus, Gerald [2 ]
Ruf, Guenther [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Univ Klinikum, Dept Surg, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Dept Oncol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; PELF; Advanced gastric cancer; HELICOBACTER-PYLORI INFECTION; PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER; ADENOCARCINOMA; EXPRESSION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2482-14-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In a retrospective study we analyzed the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) with the PELF - protocol (Cisplatin, Epirubicin, Leukovorin, 5-Fluoruracil) on mortality, recurrence and prognosis of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, UICC stages Ib-III. Methods: 64 patients were included. 26 patients received neoadjuvant CTx followed by surgical resection, 38 received surgical resection only. Tumor staging was performed by endoscopy, endosonography, computed tomography and laparoscopy. Patients staged Ib - III received two cycles of CTx according to the PELF-protocol. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not performed at all. Results: Complete (CR) or partial response (PR) was seen in 20 patients (77%), 19% showing CR and 58% PR. No benefit was observed in 6 patients (23%). Two of these 6 patients displayed tumor progression during CTx. Major toxicity was defined as grade 3 to 4 neutropenia or gastrointestinal side effects. One patient died under CTx because of neutropenia and was excluded from the overall patient collective. The curative resection rate was 77% after CTx and 74% after surgery only. The perioperative morbidity rate after CTx was 39% versus 66% after resection only. Recurrence rate after CTx was 38% and 61% after surgery alone; we detected an effective reduction of locoregional recurrence (12% vs. 26%). The overall survival was 38% after CTx and 42% after resection only. The 5-year survival rates were 45% in responders, 20% in non - responders and 42% in only resected patients. A subgroup analysis indicates that responders with stage III tumors may benefit with respect to their 5-year survival in comparable patients without neoadjuvant CTx. As to be expected, non-responders with stage III tumors did not benefit with respect to their survival. The 5-year-survival was approximated using a Kaplan-Meier curve and compared using a log-rank test. Conclusion: In patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, neoadjuvant CTx with the PELF-protocol significantly reduces the recurrence rate, especially locoregionally, compared to surgery alone. In our study, there was no overall survival benefit after a 5-year follow-up period. Alone a subgroup of patients with stage III tumors appear to benefit significantly in the long term from neoadjuvant CTx.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy and surgery for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Hao, Daxuan
    Li, Xue
    Yang, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Yougai
    Wu, Xiaoyuan
    Chen, Yongshun
    He, Chunyu
    Wang, Wen
    Liu, Jinsong
    Wang, Jianhua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (04)
  • [22] Treatment outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and transoral robotic surgery in locoregionally advanced laryngopharyngeal carcinoma
    Solimeno, Lorenzo S.
    Park, Young Min
    Lim, Jae-Yol
    Koh, Yoon Woo
    Kim, Se-Heon
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2021, 43 (11): : 3429 - 3436
  • [23] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy and surgery for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Hao, Daxuan
    Li, Xue
    Yang, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Yougai
    Wu, Xiaoyuan
    Chen, Yongshun
    Wang, Jianhua
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (02) : 346 - 353
  • [24] Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery versus Surgery Alone for Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma
    Huang, Lei
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2018, 84 (12) : E567 - E574
  • [25] Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Primary Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery in Gastric Carcinoma
    Ramachandra
    Goel, Vipin
    Raju, Kvvn
    Rao, T. Subramanyeshwar
    Patnaik
    Nusrath
    Santa
    Murthy, Sudha
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 10 (02) : 245 - 250
  • [26] Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Primary Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery in Gastric Carcinoma
    Vipin Ramachandra
    Kvvn Goel
    T. Subramanyeshwar Raju
    Sudha Rao
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 10 : 245 - 250
  • [27] Prospective randomized controlled study comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in gastric carcinoma
    Goel, V.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [28] Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery vs. surgery alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yu, Jian-Hong
    Wang, Zao-Zao
    Fan, Ying-Chong
    Liu, Mao-Xing
    Xu, Kai
    Zhang, Nan
    Yao, Zhen-Dan
    Yang, Hong
    Zhang, Cheng-Hai
    Xing, Jia-Di
    Cui, Ming
    Su, Xiang-Qian
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (14) : 1669 - 1680
  • [29] Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery vs. surgery alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yu Jian-Hong
    Wang Zao-Zao
    Fan Ying-Chong
    Liu Mao-Xing
    Xu Kai
    Zhang Nan
    Yao Zhen-Dan
    Yang Hong
    Zhang Cheng-Hai
    Xing Jia-Di
    Cui Ming
    Su Xiang-Qian
    [J]. 中华医学杂志(英文版), 2021, 134 (14) : 1669 - 1680
  • [30] Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Hong, Zhi-Nuan
    Weng, Kai
    Peng, Kaiming
    Chen, Zhen
    Lin, Jihong
    Kang, Mingqiang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11