Aortic valve replacement with small-sized disc prostheses (Medtronic Hall)

被引:0
|
作者
Brazao, AJ [1 ]
Prieto, D [1 ]
de Oliveira, JF [1 ]
Eugenio, L [1 ]
Antunes, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, P-3049 Coimbra, Portugal
来源
JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE | 1999年 / 8卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aim of the study: Several studies have demonstrated a worse performance of small prostheses in the narrow aortic root. However, modern low-profile mechanical prostheses have improved hemodynamic performance, are easy to implant, and have been used increasingly in elderly patients, where narrow roots are most frequently observed. We describe our experience in patients with aortic annuli >21 mm with the use of Medtronic Hall prostheses. Methods: Between April 1988 and December 1997, a total of 332 patients (218 females, 114 males; mean age 59.3 +/- 9.8 years (range: 29-75 years) received Medtronic Hall size 20 (n = 140), 21 (n = 96) or 22 (n = 96) prostheses. The mean body surface area was 1.59 +/- 0.12 m(2) (range: 1.27-2.01 m(2)); 140 patients were in NYHA functional classes III/IV. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics of patients in the three prosthesis-size groups. Results: The mean preoperative systolic left ventricular/aorta gradient was 64.5 +/- 24.8 mmHg (no significant inter-group difference). After cardiopulmonary bypass, peak gradients through the aortic prostheses were 13.9 +/- 8.0 mmHg in size 20 valves, 14.0 +/- 8.1 mmHg in size 21, and 10.1 +/- 8.9 mmHg in size 22. Four patients died in hospital (mortality rate 1.2%); there were no significant inter-group differences in hospital morbidity. Follow up was complete for 97% of the patients (mean 4.3 years; range: 1-11 years). The late mortality rate was 9.3% (n = 31; 2.56% per pt-yr); of these patients, 20 (14.3%) had size 20 prostheses, seven (7.3%) size 21, and four (4.2%) size 22 (p = 0.01). Fourteen patients (4.2%) died from cardiac causes, and six (1.8%) from prosthesis-related causes. Preoperative older age and aortic regurgitation were the only independent predictors of late mortality. Eight patients had systemic thromboembolic events (0.66% per pt-yr), two had prosthetic thrombosis (0.17% per pt-yr) and five had hemorrhagic episodes (0.41% per pt-yr). Seven patients had prosthetic valve endocarditis (0.58% per pt-yr). Among survivors, 97% are currently in NYHA class I/II. Conclusions: The small (size 20, 21 and 22) Medtronic Hall prostheses have good hemodynamic performance and are an excellent option as valve substitutes in patients with narrow aortic roots.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 686
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aortic valve replacement with small-sized disc prostheses (Medtronic Hall) - Discussion
    Bortolotti
    Antunes
    Kumar, S
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 1999, 8 (06): : 686 - 686
  • [2] Mitral valve replacement with small-sized tilting-disc mechanical prostheses may lead to moderate stenosis
    Hurlè, A
    Wangüemert, F
    Feijóo, JJ
    Medina, A
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 41 (02): : 247 - 249
  • [3] Valve replacement in the small aortic annulus: Prospective randomized trial of St Jude with Medtronic Hall
    Fiore, AC
    Swartz, M
    Grunkemeier, G
    Dressler, F
    Peigh, PS
    McBride, LR
    Kaiser, GC
    Labovitz, AJ
    Barner, HB
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 11 (03) : 485 - 492
  • [4] Mitral valve replacement: Randomized trial of St. Jude and Medtronic Hall prostheses
    Fiore, AC
    Barner, HB
    Swartz, MT
    McBride, LR
    Labovitz, AJ
    Vaca, KJ
    St Vrain, J
    Grunkemeier, GL
    Kaiser, GC
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 66 (03): : 707 - 712
  • [5] The small aortic root and the Medtronic Hall valve: Ultrafast computed tomography assessment of left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement
    Anderson, WA
    Ilkowski, DA
    Eldredge, J
    Cha, R
    Chen, C
    Waters, D
    Mahan, VL
    Anolik, G
    Laub, GW
    Fernandez, J
    McGrath, LB
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 1996, 5 : S329 - S335
  • [6] Long term follow-up of small (Size 20 and 21) medtronic-hall aortic valve prostheses
    Obadia, JF
    Martelloni, YA
    Bastien, OH
    deGevigney, GMD
    Chassignolle, JF
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 64 (02): : 421 - 425
  • [7] A hemodynamic comparison of omniscience and Medtronic Hall aortic prostheses
    Plehn, JF
    Arbuckle, BE
    Southworth, J
    Nugent, W
    Plume, S
    Marrin, CAS
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 1996, 5 (03): : 328 - 336
  • [8] Mitral valve replacement: Randomized trial of St. Jude and Medtronic Hall prostheses - Discussion
    Aris, A
    Fiore
    Kurlansky, PA
    Stanbridge, RD
    Schaff, HV
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 66 (03): : 712 - 713
  • [9] Disc Impediment in Medtronic-Hall Aortic Valve Prosthesis Followed by Successful Reoperation
    Glaveckaite, Sigita
    Peldzius, Ricardas
    Grebelis, Arimantas
    Serpytis, Pranas
    Laucevicius, Aleksandras
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2012, 48 (12): : 622 - 626
  • [10] A hemodynamic comparison of Omniscience and Medtronic Hall aortic prostheses - Response
    Mikhail, A
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 1996, 5 (06): : 675 - 677