Examining the Impact of Computational Creativity Exercises on College Computer Science Students' Learning, Achievement, Self-Efficacy, and Creativity

被引:21
|
作者
Peteranetz, Markeya S. [1 ]
Wang, Shiyuan [2 ]
Shell, Duane F. [1 ]
Flanigan, Abraham E. [1 ]
Soh, Leen-Kiat [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Educ Psychol, 114 Teachers Coll Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Rowan Univ, Dept Geriatr & Gerontol, Sch Osteopath Med, One Med Ctr Dr,Suite 246, Stratford, NJ 08084 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, 256 Avery Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Computational creativity; computational thinking; computer science education; PERCEPTIONS; PROFILES;
D O I
10.1145/3159450.3159459
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present study was to investigate how the inclusion of computational creativity exercises (CCEs) merging computational and creative thinking in undergraduate computer science (CS) courses affected students' course grades, learning of core CS knowledge, self-efficacy, and creative competency. CCEs were done in lower-and upper-division CS courses at a single university. Students in CCE implementation courses were compared to students in the same courses in different semesters. Propensity score matching was used to create comparable groups (control and implementation) based on students' GPA, motivation, and engagement. Results showed that implementing CCEs in undergraduate CS courses enhanced grades, learning of core CS knowledge, and self-efficacy for creatively applying CS knowledge. However, CCEs did not impact creative competency. The effect of the CCEs was consistent across upper-and lower-division courses for all outcomes. Unlike previous studies that only established the support for CCEs, such as positive dosage effects, the results of this study indicate that CCEs have a causal effect on students' achievement, learning, and self-efficacy, and this effect is independent of general academic achievement, motivation, and engagement. These findings establish the CCEs as a validated, evidence-based instructional method.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 160
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条