A comparative radiation analysis of reconfigurable memory technologies: FinFET versus bulk CMOS

被引:2
|
作者
Azimi, S. [1 ]
De Sio, C. [1 ]
Portaluri, A. [1 ]
Rizzieri, D. [1 ]
Sterpone, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dipartimento Automat & Informat, Turin, Italy
关键词
Radiation effects; Bulk CMOS; FinFET; FPGA; Soft errors; Proton radiation test;
D O I
10.1016/j.microrel.2022.114733
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This work describes a comparative radiation reliability analysis between two reconfigurable devices with different manufacturing technology: 28 nm CMOS-based and 16 nm FinFET based FPGAs. The analysis is based on a proton radiation test campaign performed at the PSI radiation facility. As application circuit, a multi-core computational engine was implemented on each one of the reconfigurable devices. The radiation sensitivity has been reported in terms of the SEU cross-section of the configuration memory bits. Results have shown a higher sensitivity of 28 nm CMOS with respect to 16 nm FinFET. Moreover, a detailed comparison of detected Single Event Multiple Upsets (SEMUs) clusters for both technology is reported.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing High-Performance Cells in CMOS Bulk and FinFET Technologies
    Meinhardt, Cristina
    Reis, Ricardo
    [J]. 2014 IEEE 5TH LATIN AMERICAN SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (LASCAS), 2014,
  • [2] Comparative Leakage Analysis of GeOI FinFET and Ge Bulk FinFET
    Hu, Vita Pi-Ho
    Fan, Ming-Long
    Su, Pin
    Chuang, Ching-Te
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 2013, 60 (10) : 3596 - 3600
  • [3] Comparative Study of FinFET versus HKMG Bulk CMOS in 16 nm Technology: Current Mirror Perspective
    Hesham, Bakr
    Hasaneen, El-Sayed
    Hamed, Hesham F. A.
    [J]. 2018 PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL JAPAN-AFRICA CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, COMMUNICATIONS, AND COMPUTATIONS (JAC-ECC 2018), 2018, : 61 - 64
  • [4] Comparative Analysis of Junctionless Bulk and SOI/SON FinFET
    Priya, Anjali
    Rai, Sanjeev
    Mishra, Ram Awadh
    [J]. 2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER, CONTROL & EMBEDDED SYSTEMS (ICPCES), 2017,
  • [5] Comparative study of Bulk, FDSOI and FinFET technologies in presence of a resistive short defect
    Karel, Amit
    Comte, Mariane
    Galliere, Jean-Marc
    Azais, Florence
    Renovell, Michel
    [J]. 2016 17TH IEEE LATIN-AMERICAN TEST SYMPOSIUM (LATS), 2016, : 129 - 134
  • [6] Analysis on single-event radiation characteristics for a bandgap reference in bulk CMOS technologies
    Wen, Yi
    Chen, Jianjun
    Liang, Bin
    Chi, Yaqing
    Xing, Haiyuan
    Yao, Xiaohu
    [J]. Guofang Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2024, 46 (04): : 169 - 174
  • [7] Comparative Study of FinFETs versus 22nm Bulk CMOS technologies: SRAM Design Perspective
    Farkhani, Hooman
    Peiravi, Ali
    Kargaard, Jens Madsen
    Moradi, Farshad
    [J]. 2014 27TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM-ON-CHIP CONFERENCE (SOCC), 2014, : 449 - 454
  • [8] Analog and RF circuits in 45 nm CMOS and below: planar bulk versus FinFET
    Wambacq, Piet
    Verbruggen, Bob
    Scheir, Karen
    Borremans, Jonathan
    De Heyn, Vincent
    Van der Plas, Geert
    Mercha, Abdelkarim
    Parvais, Bertrand
    Subramanian, Vaidy
    Jurczak, Malgorzata
    Decoutere, Stefaan
    Dormay, Stephane
    [J]. ESSCIRC 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 32ND EUROPEAN SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS CONFERENCE, 2006, : 54 - +
  • [9] ESD issues in advanced CMOS bulk and FinFET technologies: Processing, protection devices and circuit strategies
    Russ, Christian
    [J]. MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2008, 48 (8-9) : 1403 - 1411
  • [10] Analog and RF circuits in 45 nm CMOS and below: planar bulk versus FinFET
    Wambacq, Piet
    Verbruggen, Bob
    Scheir, Karen
    Borremans, Jonathan
    De Heyn, Vincent
    Van der Plas, Geert
    Mercha, Abdelkarim
    Parvais, Bertrand
    Subramanian, Vaidy
    Jurczak, Malgorzata
    Decoutere, Stefaan
    Donnay, Stephane
    [J]. ESSDERC 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH EUROPEAN SOLID-STATE DEVICE RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2006, : 53 - 56