Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations

被引:11
|
作者
van Ballegooie, Courtney [1 ,2 ]
Hoang, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Res Ctr, Expt Therapeut, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Cumming Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
older adults; readability; patient education materials; online health information; health literacy; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.16960
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES An increasing number of patients are using the internet to supplement information provided by medical professionals. Online geriatric patient education materials (PEMs) should be written at or below a 6th grade reading level (GRL) that takes into account barriers unique to the geriatric population. The objectives of the study are to assess PEMs of geriatric associations' websites and determine whether they are above the GRL recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health. DESIGN Descriptive and correlational methodology. PEMs from 10 major geriatric associations were assessed for their GRL using 10 scales. Eight of the scales provide a numerical GRL while two of the scales provide a visual representation of the GRLs. Analysis was conducted using Readability Studio 2019.3. SETTING Analysis was conducted February 2020. PARTICIPANTS Identified 10 geriatric associations and 884 PEMs. MEASUREMENTS GRLs were measured by 10 validated readability indices: the Degrees of Reading Power and Grade Equivalent test, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook test, Coleman-Liau Index, Gunning Fog Index, New Fog Count, New Dale-Chall readability formula, Ford, Caylor, Sticht scale, Raygor readability estimate graph, and Fry readability graph. RESULTS The mean of all PEMs using the numerical scales was 11.1 +/- 2.4. Ninety-nine percent of PEMs are above the 6th GRL. PEMs ranged from a grade 3.0 to 19.0 reading level. Analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference between associations (P < .0001), and multiple comparison analysis identified the National Institute on Aging as the content easiest to read (9.5 +/- 1.6). CONCLUSION PEMs from geriatric association websites are written above the recommended 6th GRL. As patients increasingly look toward online supplementary health information during COVID-19, there is an opportunity for improving PEMs to enable greater comprehension by the target population.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1056
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 152 Assessment of Quality and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Relating to Dog Bites
    Dadabhoy, M.
    Awal, D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109 (SUPPL 6)
  • [42] ASSESSMENT OF THE READABILITY, RELIABILITY AND QUALITY OF ONLINE JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS
    Spiking, J.
    Ignotus, V.
    Moran, S. P.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 56 : 8 - 9
  • [43] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to IR
    McEnteggart, Gregory E.
    Naeem, Muhammad
    Skierkowski, Dorothy
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Ahn, Sun H.
    Soares, Gregory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (08) : 1164 - 1168
  • [44] Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology
    Rishabh S. Mazmudar
    Anjani Sheth
    Raghav Tripathi
    Jeffrey F. Scott
    [J]. Archives of Dermatological Research, 2021, 313 : 201 - 204
  • [45] Readability of online patient education materials for velopharyngeal insufficiency
    Xie, Deborah X.
    Wang, Ray Y.
    Chinnadurai, Sivakumar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 104 : 113 - 119
  • [46] Accessibility and readability of online patient education on cutaneous lymphomas
    Schreidah, Celine M.
    Fahmy, Lauren M.
    Lapolla, Brigit A.
    Gordon, Emily R.
    Kwinta, Bradley D.
    Geskin, Larisa J.
    [J]. JAAD INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 13 : 83 - 90
  • [47] Readability and Suitability of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Khan, Saima
    Moon, Jared
    Martin, Cole
    Bowden, Eileen
    Chen, Judy Lynn
    Tsui, Edmund
    Crowell, Eric
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [48] Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology
    Mazmudar, Rishabh S.
    Sheth, Anjani
    Tripathi, Raghav
    Scott, Jeffrey F.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 313 (03) : 201 - 204
  • [49] Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Martin, Cole A.
    Khan, Saima
    Lee, Rachel
    Do, Anna T.
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Crowell, Eric L.
    Bowden, Eileen C.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (05): : 525 - 530
  • [50] Readability of online patient education materials for juvenile dermatomyositis
    Nickles, Melissa A.
    Ramani, Santhoshini L.
    Tegtmeyer, Kyle
    Zhao, Jeffrey
    Lio, Peter A.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 38 (02) : 544 - 546