Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations

被引:11
|
作者
van Ballegooie, Courtney [1 ,2 ]
Hoang, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Res Ctr, Expt Therapeut, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Cumming Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
older adults; readability; patient education materials; online health information; health literacy; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.16960
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES An increasing number of patients are using the internet to supplement information provided by medical professionals. Online geriatric patient education materials (PEMs) should be written at or below a 6th grade reading level (GRL) that takes into account barriers unique to the geriatric population. The objectives of the study are to assess PEMs of geriatric associations' websites and determine whether they are above the GRL recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health. DESIGN Descriptive and correlational methodology. PEMs from 10 major geriatric associations were assessed for their GRL using 10 scales. Eight of the scales provide a numerical GRL while two of the scales provide a visual representation of the GRLs. Analysis was conducted using Readability Studio 2019.3. SETTING Analysis was conducted February 2020. PARTICIPANTS Identified 10 geriatric associations and 884 PEMs. MEASUREMENTS GRLs were measured by 10 validated readability indices: the Degrees of Reading Power and Grade Equivalent test, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook test, Coleman-Liau Index, Gunning Fog Index, New Fog Count, New Dale-Chall readability formula, Ford, Caylor, Sticht scale, Raygor readability estimate graph, and Fry readability graph. RESULTS The mean of all PEMs using the numerical scales was 11.1 +/- 2.4. Ninety-nine percent of PEMs are above the 6th GRL. PEMs ranged from a grade 3.0 to 19.0 reading level. Analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference between associations (P < .0001), and multiple comparison analysis identified the National Institute on Aging as the content easiest to read (9.5 +/- 1.6). CONCLUSION PEMs from geriatric association websites are written above the recommended 6th GRL. As patients increasingly look toward online supplementary health information during COVID-19, there is an opportunity for improving PEMs to enable greater comprehension by the target population.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1056
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An assessment of the readability of online material related to fluoride
    Basch, Corey H.
    Ethan, Danna
    Cadorett, Valerie
    Kollia, Betty
    Clark, Ashley
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PREVENTION & INTERVENTION IN THE COMMUNITY, 2019, 47 (01) : 5 - 13
  • [22] Readability of online dermatology patient education resources
    Natarelli, Nicole
    Nguyen, Lynn
    Botto, Elizabeth
    Coughlin, Emily
    Krenitsky, Amanda
    Albers, Sharon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2024,
  • [23] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Cheng, Brian T.
    Kim, Anne B.
    Tanna, Angelo P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2022, 31 (06) : 438 - 442
  • [24] Assessment of the Readability of the Online Patient Education Materials of Intensive and Critical Care Societies
    Hanci, Volkan
    Otlu, Buesra
    Biyikoglu, Ali Salih
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (02) : e47 - e57
  • [25] Assessment of the Quality, Accountability, and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Optic Neuritis
    Patel, Prem N.
    Patel, Parth A.
    Ahmed, Harris
    Lai, Kevin E.
    Mackay, Devin D.
    Mollan, Susan P.
    Truong-Le, Melanie
    [J]. NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 48 (04) : 257 - 266
  • [26] Readability of Online Spine Patient Education Resources
    Luciani, A. Michael
    Foster, Brian K.
    Hayes, Daniel
    DelSole, Edward M.
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 : E640 - E644
  • [27] Readability and quality assessment of online patient education materials for spinal and epidural anesthesia
    Rai, Roopal
    Wiseman, Jacob J.
    Chau, Anthony
    Wiseman, Sam M.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2024, 71 (08): : 1092 - 1102
  • [28] Readability assessment of online patient education materials provided by the European Association of Urology
    Betschart, Patrick
    Zumstein, Valentin
    Bentivoglio, Maico
    Engeler, Daniel
    Schmid, Hans-Peter
    Abt, Dominik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 49 (12) : 2111 - 2117
  • [29] Readability assessment of online patient education materials provided by the European Association of Urology
    Patrick Betschart
    Valentin Zumstein
    Maico Bentivoglio
    Daniel Engeler
    Hans-Peter Schmid
    Dominik Abt
    [J]. International Urology and Nephrology, 2017, 49 : 2111 - 2117
  • [30] Readability of cerebrovascular diseases online educational material from major cerebrovascular organizations
    Gajjar, Avi A.
    Patel, Shray
    Patel, Shrey, V
    Goyal, Aditya
    Sioutas, Georgios S.
    Gamel, Katherine L.
    Salem, Mohamed M.
    Srinivasan, Visish M.
    Jankowitz, Brian T.
    Burkhardt, Jan Karl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2024,