Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations

被引:11
|
作者
van Ballegooie, Courtney [1 ,2 ]
Hoang, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Res Ctr, Expt Therapeut, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Cumming Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
older adults; readability; patient education materials; online health information; health literacy; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.16960
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES An increasing number of patients are using the internet to supplement information provided by medical professionals. Online geriatric patient education materials (PEMs) should be written at or below a 6th grade reading level (GRL) that takes into account barriers unique to the geriatric population. The objectives of the study are to assess PEMs of geriatric associations' websites and determine whether they are above the GRL recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health. DESIGN Descriptive and correlational methodology. PEMs from 10 major geriatric associations were assessed for their GRL using 10 scales. Eight of the scales provide a numerical GRL while two of the scales provide a visual representation of the GRLs. Analysis was conducted using Readability Studio 2019.3. SETTING Analysis was conducted February 2020. PARTICIPANTS Identified 10 geriatric associations and 884 PEMs. MEASUREMENTS GRLs were measured by 10 validated readability indices: the Degrees of Reading Power and Grade Equivalent test, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook test, Coleman-Liau Index, Gunning Fog Index, New Fog Count, New Dale-Chall readability formula, Ford, Caylor, Sticht scale, Raygor readability estimate graph, and Fry readability graph. RESULTS The mean of all PEMs using the numerical scales was 11.1 +/- 2.4. Ninety-nine percent of PEMs are above the 6th GRL. PEMs ranged from a grade 3.0 to 19.0 reading level. Analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference between associations (P < .0001), and multiple comparison analysis identified the National Institute on Aging as the content easiest to read (9.5 +/- 1.6). CONCLUSION PEMs from geriatric association websites are written above the recommended 6th GRL. As patients increasingly look toward online supplementary health information during COVID-19, there is an opportunity for improving PEMs to enable greater comprehension by the target population.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1056
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Readability of online patient education materials on gynecologic malignancies from major medical associations
    Samuel, D.
    Vilardo, N.
    Isani, S.
    Gressel, G. M.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 : 124 - 125
  • [2] Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials From Major Ophthalmologic Associations
    Huang, Grace
    Fang, Christina H.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Bhagat, Neelakshi
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Langer, Paul D.
    [J]. JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 133 (04) : 449 - 454
  • [3] Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions
    Hoang, Peter Minh
    van Ballegooie, Courtney
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (02):
  • [4] Assessment of the Readability of Web-Based Patient Education Material From Major Canadian Pediatric Associations: Cross-sectional Study
    Man, Alice
    van Ballegooie, Courtney
    [J]. JMIR PEDIATRICS AND PARENTING, 2022, 5 (01):
  • [5] Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery
    Chang, Michelle
    Weiss, Barry
    Worrell, Stephanie
    Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
    Ghaderi, Iman
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (09): : 5259 - 5265
  • [6] READABILITY OF ONLINE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIAL
    Omar, A.
    Sari, I.
    Inman, R.
    Haroon, N.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2015, 74 : 411 - 411
  • [7] Readability Assessment of Patient Education Material Published by German-Speaking Associations of Urology
    Betschart, Patrick
    Zumstein, Valentin
    Ali, Omar Hasan
    Schmid, Hans-Peter
    Abt, Dominik
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2018, 100 (01) : 79 - 84
  • [8] The Readability of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies
    Fahimuddin, Fatimah Z.
    Sidhu, Sanam
    Agrawal, Anubhav
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 174S - 175S
  • [9] Readability Assessment of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Ayoub, Samantha
    Tsui, Edmund
    Mohammed, Taariq
    Tseng, Joseph
    [J]. OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2019, 27 (03) : 399 - 403
  • [10] Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials
    Colaco, Marc
    Svider, Peter F.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Jackson, Imani M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03): : 1048 - 1052