Understanding the process from perception to cultural ecosystem services assessment by comparing valuation methods

被引:22
|
作者
Tian, Tian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sun, Lin [4 ]
Peng, Shengjing [5 ]
Sun, Fengyun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Che, Yue [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Ecol & Environm Sci, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Key Lab Urban Ecol Proc & Ecorestorat, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Ecochongming IEC, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
[5] Kunming Univ, Inst Kunming Sci Dev, Kunming 650214, Yunnan, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; Visitor-employed photography; SolVES; Social media photograph analysis; Method comparison;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126945
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
There is a close-knit link between people and cultural ecosystem services (CESs). Many methods have been verified as being able to value CESs. However, different methods have focused on specific aspects of CESs and have different highlights and challenges, which makes it difficult to select an appropriate method for specific research. To solve this problem, it is important to understand comprehensively and deeply the various CES valuation methods that exist. This study selects four representative methods, i.e., document analysis, social media photograph analysis, structured interviews and visitor-employed photography (VEP), and combines them with a participatory mapping method based on the Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) tool to compare their performance in assessing most facets of CESs. We find that the major differences among these four valuation methods are in the process from perception to CES assessment, and we list the advantages and limitations of each method for distinct aspects. Structured interviews are the most practical method because they can be applied to most situations, with few limitations and high accuracy and efficiency. Social media photograph analysis and VEP make a considerable difference in gaining perception for separate valuation purposes. The accuracy and efficiency of document analysis are low; thus, this method is better as a supplement than as an independent assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Relational values from a cultural valuation perspective: how can sociology contribute to the evaluation of ecosystem services?
    Ishihara, Hiroe
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 35 : 61 - 68
  • [42] Integrating Cultural Ecosystem Services valuation into coastal wetlands restoration: A case study from South Australia
    Clarke, Beverley
    Thet, Aung Ko
    Sandhu, Harpinder
    Dittmann, Sabine
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 116 : 220 - 229
  • [43] Valuation of ecosystem services by stakeholders operating at different levels: insights from the Portuguese cultural montado landscape
    Do Rosario, Ines T.
    Rebelo, Rui
    Caser, Ursula
    Vasconcelos, Lia
    Santos-Reis, Margarida
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2019, 19 (08) : 2173 - 2185
  • [44] Street trees as cultural elements in the city: Understanding how perception affects ecosystem services management in Porto, Portugal
    Graca, Marisa
    Queiros, Cristina
    Farinha-Marques, Paulo
    Cunha, Mario
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2018, 30 : 194 - 205
  • [45] Challenges to understanding and managing cultural ecosystem services in the global South
    McElwee, Pamela
    He, Jun
    Hsu, Minna
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 27 (03):
  • [46] Understanding the sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services in urban parks: a Colombian study case
    Granobles Velandia, Fabian Andres
    Trilleras Motha, Jenny Maritza
    Romero-Duque, Luz Piedad
    Quijas, Sandra
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2024, 27 (01) : 289 - 303
  • [47] Understanding the sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services in urban parks: a Colombian study case
    Fabián Andrés Granobles Velandia
    Jenny Maritza Trilleras Motha
    Luz Piedad Romero-Duque
    Sandra Quijas
    Urban Ecosystems, 2024, 27 : 289 - 303
  • [48] Integrating cultural ecosystem services in wildfire risk assessment
    Vigna, Ingrid
    Battisti, Luca
    Ascoli, Davide
    Besana, Angelo
    Pezzoli, Alessandro
    Comino, Elena
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 243
  • [49] Status of mapping, assessment and valuation of marine ecosystem services in the European seas
    Addamo, Anna Maria
    La Notte, Alessandra
    Guillen, Jordi
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 67
  • [50] The Challenges of Incorporating Cultural Ecosystem Services into Environmental Assessment
    Debra Satz
    Rachelle K. Gould
    Kai M. A. Chan
    Anne Guerry
    Bryan Norton
    Terre Satterfield
    Benjamin S. Halpern
    Jordan Levine
    Ulalia Woodside
    Neil Hannahs
    Xavier Basurto
    Sarah Klain
    AMBIO, 2013, 42 : 675 - 684