Understanding the process from perception to cultural ecosystem services assessment by comparing valuation methods

被引:22
|
作者
Tian, Tian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sun, Lin [4 ]
Peng, Shengjing [5 ]
Sun, Fengyun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Che, Yue [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Ecol & Environm Sci, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Key Lab Urban Ecol Proc & Ecorestorat, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Ecochongming IEC, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
[5] Kunming Univ, Inst Kunming Sci Dev, Kunming 650214, Yunnan, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; Visitor-employed photography; SolVES; Social media photograph analysis; Method comparison;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126945
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
There is a close-knit link between people and cultural ecosystem services (CESs). Many methods have been verified as being able to value CESs. However, different methods have focused on specific aspects of CESs and have different highlights and challenges, which makes it difficult to select an appropriate method for specific research. To solve this problem, it is important to understand comprehensively and deeply the various CES valuation methods that exist. This study selects four representative methods, i.e., document analysis, social media photograph analysis, structured interviews and visitor-employed photography (VEP), and combines them with a participatory mapping method based on the Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) tool to compare their performance in assessing most facets of CESs. We find that the major differences among these four valuation methods are in the process from perception to CES assessment, and we list the advantages and limitations of each method for distinct aspects. Structured interviews are the most practical method because they can be applied to most situations, with few limitations and high accuracy and efficiency. Social media photograph analysis and VEP make a considerable difference in gaining perception for separate valuation purposes. The accuracy and efficiency of document analysis are low; thus, this method is better as a supplement than as an independent assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN AGROECOSYSTEMS - PERCEPTION OF STAKEHOLDERS - CASE OF BULGARIA
    Bileva, Tatyana
    Haytova, Dimka
    Arnaudova, Zhulieta
    Hanacek, Ksenija
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2020, 63 (01): : 661 - 666
  • [32] The valuation of ecosystem services from the Totonac indigenous worldview
    Lopez Santiago, Marco Andres
    MADERA Y BOSQUES, 2019, 25 (03):
  • [33] Examining ecosystem services and disservices through deliberative socio-cultural valuation
    D. S. Baltazar
    J. Labadz
    R. Smith
    A. Telford
    M. Di Bonito
    SN Social Sciences, 2 (10):
  • [34] Ecosystem services valuation in developing countries: a review of methods and applicability approach
    Zayreth Morando-Figueroa, Coral
    Salazar-Briones, Carlos
    Mizael Ruiz-Gibert, Jose
    Antonio Lomeli-Banda, Marcelo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-URBAN DESIGN AND PLANNING, 2023, 176 (01) : 6 - 22
  • [35] Economic valuation of cultural ecosystem services: The case of landscape aesthetics in the agritourism market
    Hatan, Shachar
    Fleischer, Aliza
    Tchetchik, Anat
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 184
  • [36] An Analysis of the Worldwide Research on the Socio-Cultural Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services
    Velasco-Munoz, Juan F.
    Aznar-Sanchez, Jose A.
    Schoenemann, Marina
    Lopez-Felices, Belen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [37] Socio-cultural valuation of whale ecosystem services in Skjalfandi Bay, Iceland
    Malinauskaite, Laura
    Cook, David
    Davidsdottir, Brynhildur
    Ogmundardottir, Helga
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 180
  • [38] Socio-cultural valuation of rural and urban perception on ecosystem services and human well-being in Yanhe watershed of China
    Yang, Siqi
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Pereira, Paulo
    Liu, Yanxu
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 251
  • [39] Integrated assessment, valuation and mapping of ecosystem services and dis- services from upland land use in Wales
    Hardaker, Ashley
    Pagella, Tim
    Rayment, Mark
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 43
  • [40] Valuation of ecosystem services by stakeholders operating at different levels: insights from the Portuguese cultural montado landscape
    Inês T. do Rosário
    Rui Rebelo
    Ursula Caser
    Lia Vasconcelos
    Margarida Santos-Reis
    Regional Environmental Change, 2019, 19 : 2173 - 2185