Geomechanics response and induced seismicity during gas field depletion in the Netherlands

被引:66
|
作者
Van Wees, J. D. [1 ,2 ]
Buijze, L. [1 ]
Van Thienen-Visser, K. [1 ]
Nepveu, M. [1 ]
Wassing, B. B. T. [1 ]
Orlic, B. [1 ]
Fokker, P. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] TNO, Div Energy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Induced seismicity; Gas depletion; Geomechanics; Tectonics; FAULT REACTIVATION; FLUID INJECTION; STRESS; DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE; HYDROCARBON; PRESSURE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.05.004
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this paper we present a review of controlling geological, tectonic and engineering factors for induced seismicity associated to gas depletion in the Netherlands and we place experiences from extensive Dutch geomechanical studies in the past decade in the context of generic models for induced seismicity. Netherlands is in a mature gas production phase, marked by excellent subsurface structural and stratigraphic characterization. Over 190 gas fields of varying size have been exploited. No more than 15% of these fields show seismicity. Geomechanical studies show that, similar to the EGS stimulation phase, largest seismicity is localized on pre-existing fault structures. However, the prime cause for seismicity in gas depletion is differential compaction, whereas in EGS stimulation related pressure build-up and fluid pressure diffusion along the faults form the prime mechanism. On the other hand, our study has a close theoretical analogy to reservoirs where the fluid volumes extracted are significantly larger than the re-injected volumes, and which can result in (differential) reservoir compaction. The observed onset of induced seismicity in the Netherlands occurs after a considerable pressure drop in the gas fields. Geomechanical models show that both the delay in the onset of induced seismicity as well as the non-linear increase in seismic moment observed in the induced seismicity, can be explained using a model of differential compaction, if the faults involved in induced seismicity are not critically stressed at the onset of depletion. The presented model serves to highlight key aspects of the interaction of initial stress and differential compaction in the framework of induced seismicity in Dutch gas fields. It is not intended as predictive model for induced seismicity in a particular field. To this end, a much more detailed field specific study, taking into account the full complexity of reservoir geometry, depletion history, mechanical properties and initial stress field conditions is required. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 219
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Production induced subsidence and seismicity in the Groningen gas field - can it be managed?
    de Waal, J. A.
    Muntendam-Bos, A. G.
    Roest, J. P. A.
    Prevention and Mitigation of Natural and Anthropogenic Hazards due to Land Subsidence, 2015, 372 : 129 - 139
  • [32] Induced Seismicity Forecasting with Uncertainty Quantification: Application to the Groningen Gas Field
    Kaveh, Hojjat
    Batlle, Pau
    Acosta, Mateo
    Kulkarni, Pranav
    Bourne, Stephen J.
    Avouac, Jean Philippe
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 95 (2A) : 773 - 790
  • [33] Seismicity induced during the development of the Rittershoffen geothermal field, France
    Maurer, Vincent
    Gaucher, Emmanuel
    Grunberg, Marc
    Koepke, Rike
    Pestourie, Romain
    Cuenot, Nicolas
    GEOTHERMAL ENERGY, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [34] Seismicity induced during the development of the Rittershoffen geothermal field, France
    Vincent Maurer
    Emmanuel Gaucher
    Marc Grunberg
    Rike Koepke
    Romain Pestourie
    Nicolas Cuenot
    Geothermal Energy, 8
  • [35] Induced seismicity potential based on probabilistic geomechanics for the San Juan Basin CarbonSAFE project
    McCormack, Kevin L.
    Bratton, Tom R.
    Chen, Ting
    McPherson, Brian J.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 87 (06) : EN69 - EN79
  • [36] Induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field - arrest of ruptures by fault plane irregularities
    Wentinck, H. M.
    Kortekaas, M.
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES-GEOLOGIE EN MIJNBOUW, 2023, 102
  • [37] Analysis of the induced seismicity of the Lacq gas field (southwestern France) and model of deformation
    Bardainne, T.
    Dubos-Sallee, N.
    Senechal, G.
    Gaillot, P.
    Perroud, H.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 172 (03) : 1151 - 1162
  • [38] Role of Plasticity in Induced Seismicity Risk Mitigation: A Case of the Groningen Gas Field
    Zhao, Xiaoxi
    Jha, Birendra
    SPE JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (12): : 7060 - 7073
  • [39] MONITORING OF SUBSIDENCE AND INDUCED SEISMICITY IN THE LACQ GAS-FIELD (FRANCE) - THE CONSEQUENCES ON GAS-PRODUCTION AND FIELD OPERATION
    MAURY, VMR
    GRASSO, JR
    WITTLINGER, G
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 1992, 32 (03) : 123 - 135
  • [40] Movers and Shakers: Stock Market Response to Induced Seismicity in Oil and Gas Business
    Kallen, Matthijs Jan
    Scholtens, Bert
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (23)