Geomechanics response and induced seismicity during gas field depletion in the Netherlands

被引:66
|
作者
Van Wees, J. D. [1 ,2 ]
Buijze, L. [1 ]
Van Thienen-Visser, K. [1 ]
Nepveu, M. [1 ]
Wassing, B. B. T. [1 ]
Orlic, B. [1 ]
Fokker, P. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] TNO, Div Energy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Induced seismicity; Gas depletion; Geomechanics; Tectonics; FAULT REACTIVATION; FLUID INJECTION; STRESS; DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE; HYDROCARBON; PRESSURE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.05.004
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this paper we present a review of controlling geological, tectonic and engineering factors for induced seismicity associated to gas depletion in the Netherlands and we place experiences from extensive Dutch geomechanical studies in the past decade in the context of generic models for induced seismicity. Netherlands is in a mature gas production phase, marked by excellent subsurface structural and stratigraphic characterization. Over 190 gas fields of varying size have been exploited. No more than 15% of these fields show seismicity. Geomechanical studies show that, similar to the EGS stimulation phase, largest seismicity is localized on pre-existing fault structures. However, the prime cause for seismicity in gas depletion is differential compaction, whereas in EGS stimulation related pressure build-up and fluid pressure diffusion along the faults form the prime mechanism. On the other hand, our study has a close theoretical analogy to reservoirs where the fluid volumes extracted are significantly larger than the re-injected volumes, and which can result in (differential) reservoir compaction. The observed onset of induced seismicity in the Netherlands occurs after a considerable pressure drop in the gas fields. Geomechanical models show that both the delay in the onset of induced seismicity as well as the non-linear increase in seismic moment observed in the induced seismicity, can be explained using a model of differential compaction, if the faults involved in induced seismicity are not critically stressed at the onset of depletion. The presented model serves to highlight key aspects of the interaction of initial stress and differential compaction in the framework of induced seismicity in Dutch gas fields. It is not intended as predictive model for induced seismicity in a particular field. To this end, a much more detailed field specific study, taking into account the full complexity of reservoir geometry, depletion history, mechanical properties and initial stress field conditions is required. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 219
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Natural time and nowcasting induced seismicity at the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands
    Luginbuhl, Molly
    Rundle, John B.
    Turcotte, Donald L.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 215 (02) : 753 - 759
  • [2] Physics-based forecasting of induced seismicity at Groningen gas field, the Netherlands
    Dempsey, David
    Suckale, Jenny
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 44 (15) : 7773 - 7782
  • [3] Simulations for the development of a ground motion model for induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field, The Netherlands
    Edwards, B.
    Zurek, B.
    van Dedem, E.
    Stafford, P. J.
    Oates, S.
    van Elk, J.
    deMartin, B.
    Bommer, J. J.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 17 (08) : 4441 - 4456
  • [4] Simulations for the development of a ground motion model for induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field, The Netherlands
    B. Edwards
    B. Zurek
    E. van Dedem
    P. J. Stafford
    S. Oates
    J. van Elk
    B. deMartin
    J. J. Bommer
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 17 : 4441 - 4456
  • [5] Stress-based, statistical modeling of the induced seismicity at the Groningen gas field, The Netherlands
    Richter, Gudrun
    Hainzl, Sebastian
    Dahm, Torsten
    Zoeller, Gert
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2020, 79 (11)
  • [6] Stress-based, statistical modeling of the induced seismicity at the Groningen gas field, The Netherlands
    Gudrun Richter
    Sebastian Hainzl
    Torsten Dahm
    Gert Zöller
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2020, 79
  • [7] The Relationship between M and ML: A Review and Application to Induced Seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field, The Netherlands
    Dost, Bernard
    Edwards, Benjamin
    Bommer, Julian J.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 89 (03) : 1062 - 1074
  • [8] Reservoir creep and induced seismicity: inferences from geomechanical modeling of gas depletion in the Groningen field
    van Wees, Jan-Diederik
    Osinga, Sander
    Van Thienen-Visser, Karin
    Fokker, Peter A.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 212 (03) : 1487 - 1497
  • [9] Seismicity Scenarios for the Remaining Operating Period of the Gas Field in Groningen, Netherlands
    Zoeller, Gert
    Hainzl, Sebastian
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 94 (2A) : 805 - 812
  • [10] Using machine learning for model benchmarking and forecasting of depletion-induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field
    Limbeck, Jan
    Bisdom, Kevin
    Lanz, Fabian
    Park, Timothy
    Barbaro, Eduardo
    Bourne, Stephen
    Kiraly, Franz
    Bierman, Stijn
    Harris, Chris
    Nevenzeel, Keimpe
    den Bezemer, Taco
    van Elk, Jan
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2021, 25 (01) : 529 - 551