Sacrospinous ligament fixation with uterine preservation reduces the risk of anatomical recurrence in pelvic organ prolapse

被引:6
|
作者
Chou, Yu-Min [1 ,2 ]
Chuang, Fei-Chi [1 ,2 ]
Kung, Fu-Tsai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Tsai-Hwa [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Ling-Ying [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Kuan-Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 123 Ta Pei Rd, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Xiamen Chang Gung Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Xiamen, Peoples R China
关键词
concomitant hysterectomy; native tissue repair; pelvic organ prolapse; sacrospinous ligament fixation; uterine preservation; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; HYSTEROPEXY; WOMEN; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/luts.12361
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study investigated the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and whether uterine preservation reduces the anatomical recurrence rate. Methods The medical records of 82 patients who received SSLF in a single medical center were reviewed retrospectively. Anatomical recurrence was defined as Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification stage 2 or higher in any compartment. The primary outcome was intergroup analysis for uterine preservation and concomitant hysterectomy patients. The secondary outcomes were anatomical recurrence risk factors and the incidence of adverse events. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for demographic differences between groups. Results The anatomical recurrence rate was 19.5%, and the retreatment rate was 11.0% (mean follow-up duration: 22.9 months). Cystocele was the most common recurrent compartment (17.1%). The uterine preservation group (n = 66) was younger, had lower parity, and had fewer stage 3 to 4 cystoceles and uterine prolapses than the concomitant hysterectomy group (n = 16). Shorter operation times (99.4 minutes vs 153.7 minutes, P = .002) and lower anatomical recurrence rates (11.5% vs 45.5%, P = .039) were found in the uterine preservation group before and after PSM. Previous pelvic organ prolapse surgery (hazard ratio 3.14) and concomitant hysterectomy (hazard ratio 4.08) were identified as risk factors for anatomical recurrence. The most common adverse event was buttock pain (14.6%), which resolved spontaneously within 4 weeks. Conclusions SSLF is an effective surgical method using native tissue for pelvic reconstruction. Compared with concomitant hysterectomy, SSLF with uterine preservation reduces the anatomical recurrence rate.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A novel, meshless method of vaginal colpopexy by sacrospinous ligament fixation using the EnPlace System to treat pelvic organ prolapse
    Shenoy, S.
    Sosa-Stanley, J. N.
    Fan, T.
    Lucente, V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (03) : S841 - S841
  • [42] Risk Factors for the Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Jeon, Myung Jae
    Chung, Sue Min
    Jung, Hyun Joo
    Kim, Sei Kwang
    Bai, Sang Wook
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2008, 66 (04) : 268 - 273
  • [43] RECURRENT PELVIC SUPPORT DEFECTS AFTER SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION FOR VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE
    HOLLEY, RL
    VARNER, RE
    GLEASON, BP
    APFFEL, LA
    SCOTT, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1995, 180 (04) : 444 - 448
  • [44] A commentary on 'Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study'
    Qiu, Huiling
    Hu, Yanxia
    Zhang, Mengying
    Deng, Huaxiang
    Qing, Yinxia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (05) : 3124 - 3125
  • [45] Enlargement of the genital hiatus is associated with prolapse recurrence in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament fixation
    Garcia, Alexandra N.
    Ulker, Ashley
    Aserlind, Alexandra
    Timmons, Douglas
    Medina, Carlos A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 157 (01) : 96 - 101
  • [46] SIZE OF THE GENITAL HIATUS AS A PREDICTOR FOR RECURRENCE OF VAGINAL PROLAPSE FOLLOWING SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION
    Garcia, A. N.
    Timmons, D.
    Medina, C. A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S282 - S283
  • [47] Anatomical structures at risk using different approaches for sacrospinous ligament fixation
    De Decker, Albert
    Fergusson, Rosalie
    Ondruschka, Benjamin
    Hammer, Niels
    Zwirner, Johann
    CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2020, 33 (04) : 522 - 529
  • [48] The EnPlace TM Device- A Novel Minimally Invasive Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Procedure for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
    Gold, R.
    Baruch, Y.
    Groutz, A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S116 - S116
  • [49] Outcomes of Pregnancy and Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Uterine Preservation: A Case Series
    Alsahabi, J.
    Alsary, S.
    Balharith, M.
    Bamanie, E.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S54 - S54
  • [50] TRANSVAGINAL SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION FOR TREATMENT OF VAGINAL PROLAPSE
    SAUER, HA
    KLUTKE, CG
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (03): : 1008 - 1012