Sacrospinous ligament fixation with uterine preservation reduces the risk of anatomical recurrence in pelvic organ prolapse

被引:6
|
作者
Chou, Yu-Min [1 ,2 ]
Chuang, Fei-Chi [1 ,2 ]
Kung, Fu-Tsai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Tsai-Hwa [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Ling-Ying [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Kuan-Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 123 Ta Pei Rd, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Xiamen Chang Gung Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Xiamen, Peoples R China
关键词
concomitant hysterectomy; native tissue repair; pelvic organ prolapse; sacrospinous ligament fixation; uterine preservation; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; HYSTEROPEXY; WOMEN; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/luts.12361
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study investigated the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and whether uterine preservation reduces the anatomical recurrence rate. Methods The medical records of 82 patients who received SSLF in a single medical center were reviewed retrospectively. Anatomical recurrence was defined as Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification stage 2 or higher in any compartment. The primary outcome was intergroup analysis for uterine preservation and concomitant hysterectomy patients. The secondary outcomes were anatomical recurrence risk factors and the incidence of adverse events. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for demographic differences between groups. Results The anatomical recurrence rate was 19.5%, and the retreatment rate was 11.0% (mean follow-up duration: 22.9 months). Cystocele was the most common recurrent compartment (17.1%). The uterine preservation group (n = 66) was younger, had lower parity, and had fewer stage 3 to 4 cystoceles and uterine prolapses than the concomitant hysterectomy group (n = 16). Shorter operation times (99.4 minutes vs 153.7 minutes, P = .002) and lower anatomical recurrence rates (11.5% vs 45.5%, P = .039) were found in the uterine preservation group before and after PSM. Previous pelvic organ prolapse surgery (hazard ratio 3.14) and concomitant hysterectomy (hazard ratio 4.08) were identified as risk factors for anatomical recurrence. The most common adverse event was buttock pain (14.6%), which resolved spontaneously within 4 weeks. Conclusions SSLF is an effective surgical method using native tissue for pelvic reconstruction. Compared with concomitant hysterectomy, SSLF with uterine preservation reduces the anatomical recurrence rate.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] General Versus Regional Anesthesia in Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Assessment of a National Database.
    Romanova, A.
    Gaigbe-Togbe, B.
    Lieberman, D.
    Sifri, Y.
    Woodbury, C.
    Tran, A.
    Hardart, A.
    Dabney, L.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S376 - S376
  • [32] Single incision apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery
    Sardi, J.
    Prieto, J.
    Gomez, M.
    Cosentino, A.
    Farias, P.
    Maya, G.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 : S150 - S150
  • [33] Therapeutic outcomes, complications and recurrence rates following pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery and sacrospinous fixation (SSP)
    Papadakis, K.
    Alomari, I
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 61 - 62
  • [34] Serious Complications and Recurrence following Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Correction of Apical Prolapse
    De Gracia, Susie
    Fatton, Brigitte
    Cosson, Michel
    Campagne-Loiseau, Sandrine
    Ferry, Philippe
    Lucot, Jean-Philippe
    Debodinance, Philippe
    Panel, Laure
    Deffieux, Xavier
    Garbin, Olivier
    Lamblin, Gery
    Carlier-Guerin, Caroline
    Ramanah, Rajeev
    Fauconnier, Arnaud
    Serrand, Chris
    Fritel, Xavier
    de Tayrac, Renaud
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [35] Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study
    Li, Chunbo
    Shu, Huimin
    Dai, Zhiyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 54 : 28 - 34
  • [36] Bilateral minimal tension sacrospinous fixation in pelvic organ prolapse: an observational study
    Mothes, Anke R.
    Wanzke, Luise
    Radosa, Marc P.
    Runnebaum, Ingo B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 188 : 1 - 5
  • [37] Sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse
    Lantzsch T.
    Goepel C.
    Wolters M.
    Koelbl H.
    Methfessel H.D.
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2001, 265 (1) : 21 - 25
  • [38] Efficacy of Sacrospinous Fixation or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Stages III and IV: Randomized Clinical Trial
    Martins, Sergio Brasileiro
    Castro, Rodrigo de Aquino
    Takano, Claudia Cristina
    Marquini, Gisele Vissoci
    de Oliveira, Leticia Maria
    Martins Jr, Paulo Cezar Feldner
    Dias, Marcia Maria
    Girao, Manoel Joao Batista Castello
    Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2023, 45 (10): : E584 - E593
  • [39] Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies
    Zhu, Qinyi
    Shu, Huimin
    Du, Guiqiang
    Dai, Zhiyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 52 : 40 - 43
  • [40] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Yuanzhuo
    Peng, Liao
    Zhang, Jie
    Shen, Hong
    Luo, Deyi
    UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 133 - 139