Software quality management in turbulent times - are there alternatives to process oriented software quality management?

被引:7
|
作者
Mellis, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Lehrstuhl Wirtschaftsinformat, D-50932 Cologne, Germany
关键词
quality management; software management; organizational design; product development;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008987423699
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
There is a widely accepted paradigm of successful software development, called process oriented software quality management (PSQM). The proponents of PSQM claim that it has a significant impact on some essential parameters of a software producer's competitiveness. However, case studies of some well known software producers reveal a rather different management style. Since the management style is a means to influence the essential parameters of a company's competitiveness, which are influenced by the competitive conditions, two questions arise. 1. Do the investigated software producers employ a different management style by accident or is their management style an appropriate answer to their specific competitive conditions? 2. If their management style is an appropriate answer to their competitive conditions, what is specific about these conditions and about the appropriate management style? It is argued, that their management style is a form of concurrent engineering, which rather conforms the needs of a software producer in a turbulent environment, while PSQM on the other hand rather conforms the needs of a software producer in a placid environment. This means, there is no universal process management and environmental dynamics is a contingency factor to be considered in the configuration of process management. 0963-9314 (C) 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 295
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Software quality management by responsibility driven software evolution
    Chow, KS
    [J]. FOURTEENTH ANNUAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST SOFTWARE QUALITY CONFERENCE, 1996, : 240 - 259
  • [22] A Software Quality Metric Performance of Professional Management in Service Oriented Architecture
    Gomathy, C. K.
    Rajalakshmi, S.
    [J]. SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CURRENT TRENDS IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (ICCTET 2014), 2014, : 41 - 47
  • [23] Going soft on quality? Process management in the Scottish software industry
    Beirne, M
    Panteli, A
    Ramsay, H
    [J]. SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 1997, 6 (03) : 195 - 209
  • [24] Going soft on quality?:Process management in the Scottish software industry
    Martin Beirne
    Androniki Panteli
    Harvie Ramsay
    [J]. Software Quality Journal, 1997, 6 : 195 - 209
  • [25] Defect Management Life Cycle Process for Software Quality Improvement
    Rahman, Aedah Abd
    Hasim, Nurdatillah
    [J]. 2015 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, MODELLING AND SIMULATION (AIMS 2015), 2015, : 241 - 244
  • [26] Research on Software Quality Assurance Based on Software Quality Standards and Technology Management
    Shen, Peng
    Ding, Xiaoming
    Ren, Wenjun
    Yang, Chujun
    [J]. 2018 19TH IEEE/ACIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, NETWORKING AND PARALLEL/DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING (SNPD), 2018, : 385 - 390
  • [27] Going soft on quality?: Process management in the Scottish software industry
    Beirne, Martin
    Panteli, Androniki
    Ramsay, Harvie
    [J]. Software Quality Journal, 1997, 6 (03): : 195 - 209
  • [28] MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PRACTICES FOR QUALITY SOFTWARE
    TICE, GD
    [J]. QUALITY PROGRESS, 1983, 16 (02) : 42 - 42
  • [29] Evaluation Framework for Quality Management Software
    Hrgarek, Nadica
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL SCIENCES, 2008, 32 (01) : 33 - 50
  • [30] A theoretical model for software quality management
    Ambrose, PJ
    Eynon, JW
    [J]. ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1998, : 855 - 856