Validation of a Time- and Frequency-Domain Grazing Flow Acoustic Liner Model

被引:34
|
作者
Burak, Markus O. [1 ]
Billson, Mattias [2 ]
Eriksson, Lars-Erik [1 ]
Baralon, Stephane [2 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers, Div Fluid Dynam, Dept Appl Mech, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Volvo Aero Corp, Ctr Excellence Aerothermodynam, SE-46181 Trollhattan, Sweden
关键词
IMPEDANCE BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS; SOUND; PROPAGATION; SIMULATION; DUCTS;
D O I
10.2514/1.40870
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In today's aeroengines, acoustic liners are extensively used to suppress noise. To optimize their placement and tuning, there is a need for acoustic liner models capturing their effect. Traditionally, the presence of a mean flow has been accounted for through the Ingard or later the generalization in form of the Myers boundary condition. This paper shows that a direct use of nominal impedance for the acoustic liner is justified if the mean flow is properly accounted for by the flow equations. An accurate assessment of the acoustic liner in the presence of grazing flows can be obtained without using an acoustic liner model accounting for the How, for example, the Myers boundary condition. Validations have been made for both time and frequency-domain solvers using large-eddy simulations and linearized Navier-Stokes equations.
引用
收藏
页码:1841 / 1848
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reference values for time- and frequency-domain heart rate variability measures
    Sammito, Stefan
    Boeckelmann, Irina
    HEART RHYTHM, 2016, 13 (06) : 1309 - 1316
  • [42] A comparative review of time- and frequency-domain methods for fatigue damage assessment
    Muñiz-Calvente, M.
    Álvarez-Vázquez, A.
    Pelayo, F.
    Aenlle, M.
    García-Fernández, N.
    Lamela-Rey, M.J.
    International Journal of Fatigue, 2022, 163
  • [43] FIR filters for online trajectory planning with time- and frequency-domain specifications
    Biagiotti, Luigi
    Melchiorri, Claudio
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2012, 20 (12) : 1385 - 1399
  • [44] Nonorthogonal PEEC formulation for time- and frequency-domain EM and circuit modeling
    Ruehli, AE
    Antonini, G
    Esch, J
    Ekman, J
    Mayo, A
    Orlandi, A
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2003, 45 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [45] Time- and frequency-domain analysis using lumped mass global collocation
    Provatidis, Christopher G.
    ARCHIVE OF APPLIED MECHANICS, 2008, 78 (11) : 909 - 920
  • [46] A simple method for relating time- and frequency-domain measures of oscillator performance
    McNeill, JA
    2001 SOUTHWEST SYMPOSIUM ON MIXED-SIGNAL DESIGN, 2001, : 7 - 12
  • [47] Characterization of high-frequency interconnects: Comparison between time- and frequency-domain methods
    Bieler, Mark
    Arz, Uwe
    2016 IEEE 20TH WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL AND POWER INTEGRITY (SPI), 2016,
  • [48] TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN ANALYSIS OF ACOUSTIC SCATTERING BY SPHERES
    THORNE, PD
    BRUDNER, TJ
    WATERS, KR
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1994, 95 (05): : 2478 - 2487
  • [49] Admissibility and Exact Observability of Observation Operators for Micro-Beam Model: Time- and Frequency-Domain Approaches
    Edalatzadeh, Mohammad S.
    Alasty, Aria
    Vatankhah, Ramin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2017, 62 (12) : 6438 - 6444
  • [50] Time- and frequency-domain two-particle correlations of a driven dissipative Bose-Hubbard model
    Adhikary, Kingshuk
    Dey, Anushree
    Pal, Arpita
    Mal, Subhanka
    Deb, Bimalendu
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2021, 103 (03)