Validation of a Time- and Frequency-Domain Grazing Flow Acoustic Liner Model

被引:34
|
作者
Burak, Markus O. [1 ]
Billson, Mattias [2 ]
Eriksson, Lars-Erik [1 ]
Baralon, Stephane [2 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers, Div Fluid Dynam, Dept Appl Mech, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Volvo Aero Corp, Ctr Excellence Aerothermodynam, SE-46181 Trollhattan, Sweden
关键词
IMPEDANCE BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS; SOUND; PROPAGATION; SIMULATION; DUCTS;
D O I
10.2514/1.40870
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In today's aeroengines, acoustic liners are extensively used to suppress noise. To optimize their placement and tuning, there is a need for acoustic liner models capturing their effect. Traditionally, the presence of a mean flow has been accounted for through the Ingard or later the generalization in form of the Myers boundary condition. This paper shows that a direct use of nominal impedance for the acoustic liner is justified if the mean flow is properly accounted for by the flow equations. An accurate assessment of the acoustic liner in the presence of grazing flows can be obtained without using an acoustic liner model accounting for the How, for example, the Myers boundary condition. Validations have been made for both time and frequency-domain solvers using large-eddy simulations and linearized Navier-Stokes equations.
引用
收藏
页码:1841 / 1848
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] JOINT TIME- AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN RESHAPING OF ROOM IMPULSE RESPONSES
    Jungmann, Jan Ole
    Mazur, Radoslaw
    Mertins, Alfred
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2015, : 733 - 737
  • [22] Multiscale Time- and Frequency-domain Likelihood Analysis with Photon Weights
    Kerr, M.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 885 (01):
  • [23] Time- and Frequency-Domain Characterization of Railgun Sliding Contact Noise
    Engel, Thomas G.
    Rada, Nicholas M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2017, 45 (07) : 1321 - 1326
  • [24] Critical comparison between time- and frequency-domain relaxation functions
    Snyder, CR
    Mopsik, FI
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1999, 60 (02): : 984 - 990
  • [25] Time- and frequency-domain analysis of fluorescence lifetime for temperature sensors
    Fernicola, VC
    Rosso, L
    2000 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS DIGEST, 2000, : 587 - 588
  • [26] Time- and frequency-domain responses of the brain to standard experimental paradigms
    Karakas, S
    Erzengin, ÖU
    Çakmak, ED
    2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Vols 1 and 2, Symposium Record, 2003, : 840 - 843
  • [27] Comparison between time- and frequency-domain high-frequency device characterizations
    Bieler, Mark
    Arz, Uwe
    2016 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS (CPEM 2016), 2016,
  • [28] Time- vs. frequency-domain femtosecond surface sum frequency generation
    Roke, S
    Kleyn, AW
    Bonn, M
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 2003, 370 (1-2) : 227 - 232
  • [29] TIME- VERSUS FREQUENCY-DOMAIN INVERSE ELASTIC SCATTERING: THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
    Liu, X.
    Song, J.
    Pourahmadian, F.
    Haddar, H.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2023, 83 (03) : 1296 - 1314
  • [30] Combination of time- and frequency-domain methods for the analysis of open resonators with gratings
    Sirenko, YK
    Velychko, LG
    ICECOM 2003, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 415 - 418