Informed Consent for Exome Sequencing Research in Families with Genetic Disease: The Emerging Issue of Incidental Findings

被引:29
|
作者
Bergner, Amanda L. [1 ]
Bollinger, Juli [2 ]
Raraigh, Karen S. [1 ]
Tichnell, Crystal [3 ]
Murray, Brittney [3 ]
Blout, Carrie Lynn [1 ]
Telegrafi, Aida Bytyci [1 ]
James, Cynthia A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, McKusick Nathans Inst Genet Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Genet & Publ Policy Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
exome sequencing; genome sequencing; informed consent; incidental findings; genetic counseling; genetic testing; UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM; CLINICAL EXOME; GENOMICS; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.a.36706
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genomic sequencing technology is increasingly used in genetic research. Studies of informed consent for exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) research have largely involved hypothetical scenarios or healthy individuals enrolling in population-based studies. Studies have yet to explore the consent experiences of adults with inherited disease. We conducted a qualitative interview study of 15 adults recently enrolled in a large-scale ES/GS study (11 affected adults, four parents of affected children). Our study had two goals: (1) to explore three theoretical barriers to consent for ES/GS research (interpretive/technical complexity, possibility of incidental findings, and risks of loss of privacy); and (2) to explore how interviewees experienced the consent process. Interviewees could articulate study goals and processes, describe incidental findings, discuss risks of privacy loss, and reflect on their consent experience. Few expected the study would identify the genetic cause of their condition. All elected to receive incidental findings. Interviewees acknowledged paying little attention to potential implications of incidental findings in light of more pressing goals of supporting research regarding their own medical conditions. Interviewees suggested that experience living with a genetic condition prepared them to adjust to incidental findings. Interviewees also expressed little concern about loss of confidentiality of study data. Some experienced the consent process as very long. None desired reconsent prior to return of study results. Families with inherited disease likely would benefit from a consent process in which study risks and benefits were discussed in the context of prior experiences with genetic research and genetic disease. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:2745 / 2752
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The end of informed consent -: The informed contract in genetic research and public health
    Schröder, P
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2004, 66 (8-9) : 631 - 631
  • [42] Diagnostic exome sequencing of Danish families with rare genetic diseases
    Ek, J.
    Risom, L.
    Ostergaard, E.
    Duno, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 : 673 - 674
  • [43] Reporting Incidental Findings in Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing: Incorporation of the 2013 ACMG Recommendations into Current Practices of Genetic Counseling
    Smith, Lacey A.
    Douglas, Jessica
    Braxton, Alicia A.
    Kramer, Kate
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2015, 24 (04) : 654 - 662
  • [44] The ethics of informed consent in Alzheimer disease research
    Scott Y. H. Kim
    Nature Reviews Neurology, 2011, 7 : 410 - 414
  • [45] INFORMED CONSENT IN CATASTROPHIC DISEASE RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
    CAPRON, AM
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1974, 123 (02) : 340 - 438
  • [46] Ethical issues in genetic research: Disclosure and informed consent
    Reilly, PR
    Boshar, MF
    Holtzman, SH
    NATURE GENETICS, 1997, 15 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [47] Communal discourse as a supplement to informed consent for genetic research
    Morris W. Foster
    Ann J. Eisenbraun
    Thomas H. Carter
    Nature Genetics, 1997, 17 : 277 - 279
  • [48] ASHG REPORT - Statement on informed consent for genetic research
    Strass, E
    McCabe, ERB
    Biesecker, L
    Cassidy, S
    Chakravarti, A
    Grody, W
    Juengst, E
    Khory, M
    Knoppers, BM
    Motulsky, A
    Phillips, JA
    Spence, MA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1996, 59 (02) : 471 - 474
  • [49] Ethical issues in genetic research: disclosure and informed consent
    Philip R. Reilly
    Mark R Boshar
    Steven H. Holtzman
    Nature Genetics, 1997, 15 : 16 - 20
  • [50] Communal discourse as a supplement to informed consent for genetic research
    Foster, MW
    Eisenbraun, AJ
    Carter, TH
    NATURE GENETICS, 1997, 17 (03) : 277 - 279