Informed Consent for Exome Sequencing Research in Families with Genetic Disease: The Emerging Issue of Incidental Findings

被引:29
|
作者
Bergner, Amanda L. [1 ]
Bollinger, Juli [2 ]
Raraigh, Karen S. [1 ]
Tichnell, Crystal [3 ]
Murray, Brittney [3 ]
Blout, Carrie Lynn [1 ]
Telegrafi, Aida Bytyci [1 ]
James, Cynthia A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, McKusick Nathans Inst Genet Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Genet & Publ Policy Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
exome sequencing; genome sequencing; informed consent; incidental findings; genetic counseling; genetic testing; UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM; CLINICAL EXOME; GENOMICS; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.a.36706
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genomic sequencing technology is increasingly used in genetic research. Studies of informed consent for exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) research have largely involved hypothetical scenarios or healthy individuals enrolling in population-based studies. Studies have yet to explore the consent experiences of adults with inherited disease. We conducted a qualitative interview study of 15 adults recently enrolled in a large-scale ES/GS study (11 affected adults, four parents of affected children). Our study had two goals: (1) to explore three theoretical barriers to consent for ES/GS research (interpretive/technical complexity, possibility of incidental findings, and risks of loss of privacy); and (2) to explore how interviewees experienced the consent process. Interviewees could articulate study goals and processes, describe incidental findings, discuss risks of privacy loss, and reflect on their consent experience. Few expected the study would identify the genetic cause of their condition. All elected to receive incidental findings. Interviewees acknowledged paying little attention to potential implications of incidental findings in light of more pressing goals of supporting research regarding their own medical conditions. Interviewees suggested that experience living with a genetic condition prepared them to adjust to incidental findings. Interviewees also expressed little concern about loss of confidentiality of study data. Some experienced the consent process as very long. None desired reconsent prior to return of study results. Families with inherited disease likely would benefit from a consent process in which study risks and benefits were discussed in the context of prior experiences with genetic research and genetic disease. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:2745 / 2752
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The reuse of genetic information in research and informed consent
    Lorenzo, David
    Esquerda, Montse
    Bofarull, Margarita
    Cusi, Victoria
    Roig, Helena
    Carrera, Joan
    Carrera, Joan
    Palau, Francesc
    Cambra, Francisco Jose
    Vila, Marti
    Garriga, Martina
    Palau, Francesc
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2023, 31 (12) : 1393 - 1397
  • [32] The reuse of genetic information in research and informed consent
    David Lorenzo
    Montse Esquerda
    Margarita Bofarull
    Victoria Cusi
    Helena Roig
    Joan Bertran
    Joan Carrera
    Francesc Torralba
    Francisco José Cambra
    Martí Vila
    Martina Garriga
    Francesc Palau
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2023, 31 : 1393 - 1397
  • [33] INFORMED CONSENT BY PROXY - AN ISSUE IN RESEARCH WITH ELDERLY PATIENTS
    WARREN, JW
    SOBAL, J
    TENNEY, JH
    HOOPES, JM
    DAMRON, D
    LEVENSON, S
    DEFORGE, BR
    MUNCIE, HL
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (18): : 1124 - 1128
  • [34] Incidental medical findings in genetic research
    Darren J. Burgess
    Nature Reviews Genetics, 2014, 15 (7) : 441 - 441
  • [35] Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing
    Allyse, Megan
    Michie, Marsha
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (08) : 439 - 441
  • [36] Genetic disease registries and informed consent.
    Bernhardt, BA
    Hamby, LA
    Geller, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2002, 71 (04) : 380 - 380
  • [37] Readability of informed consent forms for whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing
    Niemiec E.
    Vears D.F.
    Borry P.
    Howard H.C.
    Journal of Community Genetics, 2018, 9 (2) : 143 - 151
  • [38] Informed consent for exome sequencing in diagnostics: exploring first experiences and views of professionals and patients
    Rigter, T.
    van Aart, C. J. . A.
    Elting, M. W.
    Waisfisz, Q.
    Cornel, M. C.
    Henneman, L.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2014, 85 (05) : 417 - 422
  • [39] On the Justifiability of ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing
    May, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2015, 43 (01): : 134 - 142
  • [40] Who's on first in exome and whole genome sequencing? Is it the patient or the incidental findings?
    Rosenblatt, David S.
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2013, 110 (1-2) : 1 - 2