Multicentre Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge Study in Children Sensitised to Cashew Nut

被引:38
|
作者
van der Valk, Johanna P. M. [1 ]
van Wijk, Roy Gerth [1 ]
Dubois, Anthony E. J. [2 ]
de Groot, Hans [3 ]
Reitsma, Marit [4 ]
Vlieg-Boerstra, Berber [5 ]
Savelkoul, Huub F. J. [6 ]
Wichers, Harry J. [4 ]
de Jong, Nicolette W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Internal Med, Allergol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pediat Pulmonol & Pediat Allergol, GRIAC Res Inst, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] RdGG, Diaconessenhuis Voorburg, Dept Pediat Allergol, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Food & Biobased Res, Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Emma Childrens Hosp, Pediat Resp Med & Allergy, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Lab Cell Biol & Immunol, Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
PEANUT ALLERGY; NATURAL-HISTORY; CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY; CROSS-REACTIVITY; EUROPEAN ACADEMY; PISTACHIO; ANAPHYLAXIS; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0151055
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Few studies with a limited number of patients have provided indications that cashew-allergic patients may experience severe allergic reactions to minimal amounts of cashew nut. The objectives of this multicentre study were to assess the clinical relevance of cashew nut sensitisation, to study the clinical reaction patterns in double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge tests and to establish the amount of cashew nuts that can elicit an allergic reaction. Methods and Findings A total of 179 children were included (median age 9.0 years; range 2-17 years) with cashew nut sensitisation and a clinical history of reactions to cashew nuts or unknown exposure. Sensitised children who could tolerate cashew nuts were excluded. The study included three clinical visits and a telephone consultation. During the first visit, the medical history was evaluated, physical examinations were conducted, blood samples were drawn and skin prick tests were performed. The children underwent a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge test with cashew nut during the second and third visits. The study showed that 137 (76.5%) of the sensitised children suspected of allergy to cashew nut had a positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge test, with 46% (63) manifesting subjective symptoms to the lowest dose of 1 mg cashew nut protein and 11% (15) developing objective symptoms to the lowest dose. Children most frequently had gastro-intestinal symptoms, followed by oral allergy and skin symptoms. A total of 36% (49/137) of the children experienced an anaphylactic reaction and 6% (8/137) of the children were treated with epinephrine. Conclusion This prospective study demonstrated a strikingly high percentage of clinical reactions to cashew nut in this third line population. Severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine, were observed. These reactions were to minimal amounts of cashew nut, demonstrated the high potency of this allergens.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors contributing to the severity of reaction in the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC)
    Pettersson, E.
    Flokstra-de Blok, B.
    van der Heide, S.
    Kukler, J.
    Kerkhof, M.
    Dubois, A.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 : 593 - 593
  • [42] Validation of new recipes for double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges in children
    Nordstrom, L.
    Strinnholm, A.
    Nylander, A.
    Jonsell, A.
    Ronmark, E.
    West, C.
    Winberg, A.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 : 371 - 371
  • [43] Double-blind, placebo-controlled corn challenge resulting in anaphylaxis
    Tanaka, LG
    El-Dahr, JM
    Lehrer, SB
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 107 (04) : 744 - 744
  • [44] EFFICACY OF EBASTINE ASSESSED BY NASAL CHALLENGE IN A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    CHANAL, I
    MAUDINO, G
    CAMPBELL, AM
    FERRER, P
    MICHEL, FB
    BOUSQUET, J
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 93 (01) : 272 - 272
  • [45] NALTREXONE IN AUTISTIC-CHILDREN - A DOUBLE-BLIND AND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    CAMPBELL, M
    ANDERSON, LT
    SMALL, AM
    LOCASCIO, JJ
    LYNCH, NS
    CHOROCO, MC
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY BULLETIN, 1990, 26 (01) : 130 - 135
  • [46] A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Atomoxetine in Young Children With ADHD
    Kratochvil, Christopher J.
    Vaughan, Brigette S.
    Stoner, Julie A.
    Daughton, Joan M.
    Lubberstedt, Brian D.
    Murray, Desiree W.
    Chrisman, Allan K.
    Faircloth, Melissa A.
    Itchon-Ramos, Nilda B.
    Kollins, Scott H.
    Maayan, Lawrence A.
    Greenhill, Laurence L.
    Kotler, Lisa A.
    Fried, Jane
    March, John S.
    PEDIATRICS, 2011, 127 (04) : E862 - E868
  • [47] IS CISAPRIDE EFFECTIVE IN CHILDREN WITH CONSTIPATION - A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    NURKO, S
    WORONA, L
    GARCIAARANDA, JA
    ZLOCHISTY, O
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 106 (04) : A549 - A549
  • [48] Risperidone in children with autism: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study
    Nagaraj, Ravishankar
    Singhi, Pratibha
    Malhi, Prahbhjot
    JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2006, 21 (06) : 450 - 455
  • [49] A double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled study of tiludronate in Paget's disease of bone
    Fraser, WD
    Stamp, TC
    Creek, RA
    Sawyer, JP
    Picot, C
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 73 (862) : 496 - 502
  • [50] The Impact of Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) on the Socioeconomic Cost of Food Allergy in Europe
    Cerecedo, I.
    Zamora, J.
    Fox, M.
    Voordouw, J.
    Plana, N.
    Rokicka, E.
    Fernandez-Rivas, M.
    Cortes, S. Vazquez
    Reche, M.
    Fiandor, A.
    Kowalski, M.
    Antonides, G.
    Mugford, M.
    Frewer, L. J.
    de la Hoz, B.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 24 (06) : 418 - 424