Multicentre Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge Study in Children Sensitised to Cashew Nut

被引:38
|
作者
van der Valk, Johanna P. M. [1 ]
van Wijk, Roy Gerth [1 ]
Dubois, Anthony E. J. [2 ]
de Groot, Hans [3 ]
Reitsma, Marit [4 ]
Vlieg-Boerstra, Berber [5 ]
Savelkoul, Huub F. J. [6 ]
Wichers, Harry J. [4 ]
de Jong, Nicolette W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Internal Med, Allergol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pediat Pulmonol & Pediat Allergol, GRIAC Res Inst, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] RdGG, Diaconessenhuis Voorburg, Dept Pediat Allergol, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Food & Biobased Res, Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Emma Childrens Hosp, Pediat Resp Med & Allergy, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Lab Cell Biol & Immunol, Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
PEANUT ALLERGY; NATURAL-HISTORY; CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY; CROSS-REACTIVITY; EUROPEAN ACADEMY; PISTACHIO; ANAPHYLAXIS; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0151055
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Few studies with a limited number of patients have provided indications that cashew-allergic patients may experience severe allergic reactions to minimal amounts of cashew nut. The objectives of this multicentre study were to assess the clinical relevance of cashew nut sensitisation, to study the clinical reaction patterns in double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge tests and to establish the amount of cashew nuts that can elicit an allergic reaction. Methods and Findings A total of 179 children were included (median age 9.0 years; range 2-17 years) with cashew nut sensitisation and a clinical history of reactions to cashew nuts or unknown exposure. Sensitised children who could tolerate cashew nuts were excluded. The study included three clinical visits and a telephone consultation. During the first visit, the medical history was evaluated, physical examinations were conducted, blood samples were drawn and skin prick tests were performed. The children underwent a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge test with cashew nut during the second and third visits. The study showed that 137 (76.5%) of the sensitised children suspected of allergy to cashew nut had a positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge test, with 46% (63) manifesting subjective symptoms to the lowest dose of 1 mg cashew nut protein and 11% (15) developing objective symptoms to the lowest dose. Children most frequently had gastro-intestinal symptoms, followed by oral allergy and skin symptoms. A total of 36% (49/137) of the children experienced an anaphylactic reaction and 6% (8/137) of the children were treated with epinephrine. Conclusion This prospective study demonstrated a strikingly high percentage of clinical reactions to cashew nut in this third line population. Severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine, were observed. These reactions were to minimal amounts of cashew nut, demonstrated the high potency of this allergens.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Standardization of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges
    Bindslev-Jensen, C
    ALLERGY, 2001, 56 : 75 - 77
  • [32] MASKING FOODS FOR FOOD CHALLENGE - PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF MASKING FOODS FOR A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED FOOD CHALLENGE
    HUIJBERS, GB
    COLEN, AAM
    JANSEN, JJN
    KARDINAAL, AFM
    VLIEGBOERSTRA, BJ
    MARTENS, BPM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1994, 94 (06) : 645 - 649
  • [33] Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge Is Essential In Primary Hazelnut Allergy Diagnosis
    Ke, Danbing
    Mazer, Bruce
    Lejtenyi, Duncan
    Beaudette, Liane
    St-Pierre, Yvan
    Gabrielli, Sofianne
    Upton, Julia
    Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 145 (02) : AB230 - AB230
  • [34] Roasted hazelnuts -: allergenic activity evaluated by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge
    Hansen, KS
    Ballmer-Weber, BK
    Lüttkopf, D
    Skov, PS
    Wüthrich, B
    Bindslev-Jensen, C
    Vieths, S
    Poulsen, LK
    ALLERGY, 2003, 58 (02) : 132 - 138
  • [35] Development of hazelnut allergy after a negative double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge
    Masthoff, L.
    Flinterman, A.
    Akkerdaas, J.
    Van Hoffen, E.
    Knulst, A.
    Meijer, Y.
    Pasmans, S.
    ALLERGY, 2010, 65 : 80 - 80
  • [36] Allergenicity of Wine Containing Processing Aids: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge
    Kirschner, S.
    Belloni, B.
    Kugler, C.
    Ring, J.
    Brockow, K.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 210 - 217
  • [37] Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine
    Chawla, J. M.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2008, 10 : 42 - 42
  • [38] Statistical issues in clinical trials that involve the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge
    Chinchilli, VM
    Fisher, L
    Craig, TJ
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 115 (03) : 592 - 597
  • [39] A Novel Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge Matrix for Milk and Raw Egg
    Vandekerckhove, Marjolein
    Van Droogenbroeck, Bart
    De Loose, Marc
    Coudijzer, Katleen
    Van Winckel, Myriam
    Gevaert, Philippe
    Lapeere, Hilde
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 179 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [40] Accumulation of doses and the severity of reaction in the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC)
    Pettersson, E.
    Flokstra-de Blok, B.
    van der Heide, S.
    Kukler, J.
    Kerkhof, M.
    Dubois, A.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 : 610 - 610