Pros and cons of organ shielding for CT imaging

被引:10
|
作者
Samei, Ehsan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs RAI Labs, Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs RAI Labs, Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Dept Med Phys, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs RAI Labs, Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Dept Phys, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs RAI Labs, Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs RAI Labs, Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Durham, NC 27705 USA
关键词
Computed tomography; Organ dose; Patient-specific; Organ shielding; Pediatric; TUBE-CURRENT MODULATION; RADIATION-DOSE REDUCTION; THORACIC CT; BREAST; MDCT;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-014-3084-z
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
With the increased importance of CT radiation dose to health care providers, patients and the general public, there is an increased responsibility to minimize patient dose effectively. Bismuth shields offer a simple strategy to reduce dose to certain anterior radiosensitive organs such as breasts and eyes. However, in order to reduce organ dose they must be used properly; improper use can lead to an actual increase in the patient dose. They also create a proportional increase in image noise in the section of the body adjacent to the shield and further reduce the quantitative precision of CT numbers. In addition, shielding can degrade the overall efficiency (by an order of approximately 10%) of the imaging process, reducing the theoretical image quality that can be expected from a certain level of patient dose. However, in spite of their significant disadvantages, there are certain clinical situations and practice considerations that provide qualified justification for their continued use.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 500
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Screening MR Imaging Versus Screening Ultrasound Pros and Cons
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    Newell, Mary S.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (03) : 495 - +
  • [32] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cochlear Implant Recipients Pros and Cons
    Kanal, Emanuel
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2015, 141 (01) : 52 - 53
  • [33] Pros and cons of dabigatran
    Cheng, Christine M.
    McCurdy, Megan R.
    Wong, Heather A.
    Kayser, Steven R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2011, 68 (16) : 1495 - 1495
  • [34] IBM - PROS AND CONS
    FITZGIBBON, B
    POPULAR COMPUTING, 1984, 3 (09): : 14 - 14
  • [35] COGENERATION PROS/CONS
    PHILLIPS, CW
    ASHRAE JOURNAL-AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING REFRIGERATING AND AIR-CONDITIONING ENGINEERS, 1990, 32 (09): : 14 - 14
  • [36] Pros and cons of ERPs
    不详
    CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION, 1998, 30 (12): : 27 - 27
  • [37] SCHENGEN - THE PROS AND CONS
    不详
    COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 1995, 32 (03): : 673 - 678
  • [38] Circumcision pros and cons
    Brockmeyer, N. H.
    HAUTARZT, 2010, 61 (02): : 171 - 171
  • [39] Pros and cons of centralization
    不详
    NATURE, 2003, 423 (6942) : 787 - 787
  • [40] Weigh the pros and cons
    Pao, P
    COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, 2006, 43 (03): : 21 - 21