Pros and cons of organ shielding for CT imaging

被引:10
|
作者
Samei, Ehsan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs RAI Labs, Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs RAI Labs, Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Dept Med Phys, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs RAI Labs, Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Dept Phys, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs RAI Labs, Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs RAI Labs, Duke Clin Imaging Phys Grp, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Durham, NC 27705 USA
关键词
Computed tomography; Organ dose; Patient-specific; Organ shielding; Pediatric; TUBE-CURRENT MODULATION; RADIATION-DOSE REDUCTION; THORACIC CT; BREAST; MDCT;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-014-3084-z
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
With the increased importance of CT radiation dose to health care providers, patients and the general public, there is an increased responsibility to minimize patient dose effectively. Bismuth shields offer a simple strategy to reduce dose to certain anterior radiosensitive organs such as breasts and eyes. However, in order to reduce organ dose they must be used properly; improper use can lead to an actual increase in the patient dose. They also create a proportional increase in image noise in the section of the body adjacent to the shield and further reduce the quantitative precision of CT numbers. In addition, shielding can degrade the overall efficiency (by an order of approximately 10%) of the imaging process, reducing the theoretical image quality that can be expected from a certain level of patient dose. However, in spite of their significant disadvantages, there are certain clinical situations and practice considerations that provide qualified justification for their continued use.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 500
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PROS AND CONS
    ALSTEAD, S
    LANCET, 1949, 257 (SEP10): : 490 - 490
  • [22] PROS AND CONS
    REITINGER, C
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 123 (08): : 17 - 17
  • [23] The pros and cons
    Jouffroy, Jean-Pierre
    PENSEE, 2013, (374): : 57 - +
  • [24] Pros and Cons
    Voas, Jeffrey
    COMPUTER, 2025, 58 (03) : 16 - 21
  • [25] Pros & Cons
    Herr, Yeek
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2011, 41 (02): : 53 - 53
  • [26] Pros cons
    Hagerman, P
    STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2001, 23 (06): : 36 - 36
  • [27] The pros and cons
    Jones, Royston
    Design Engineering (London), 2002, (JAN.):
  • [28] Cardiac Computed Tomography: Pros and Cons of CT Coronary Angiography
    Schmermund, A.
    Eckert, J.
    Voigtlaender, T.
    AKTUELLE KARDIOLOGIE, 2016, 5 (06) : 424 - 430
  • [29] Pros and cons of thrombophilia testing: cons
    Machin, SJ
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2003, 1 (03) : 412 - 413
  • [30] Pros and cons of thrombophilia testing: pros
    Martinelli, I
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2003, 1 (03) : 410 - 411