Frailty Risks of Prescription Analgesics and Sedatives across Frailty Models: the Health and Retirement Study

被引:2
|
作者
Bergen, Andrew W. [1 ]
Cil, Gulcan [1 ]
Sargent, Lana J. [2 ,3 ]
Dave, Chintan, V [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Res Inst, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Nursing, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Pharm, Geriatr Pharmacotherapy Program, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Pharmacoepidemiol & Treatment Sci, Inst Hlth Hlth Care Policy & Aging Res, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Rutgers State Univ, Ernest Mario Sch Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Adm, Piscataway, NJ USA
关键词
OLDER-ADULTS; PERSISTENT PAIN; POLYPHARMACY; PREDICTION; OPIOIDS;
D O I
10.1007/s40266-022-00941-2
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Introduction Limited evidence for incident frailty risks associated with prescription analgesics and sedatives in older (>= 65 years) community-living adults prompted a more comprehensive investigation. Methods We used data from older Health and Retirement Study respondents and three frailty models (frailty index, functional domain, frailty phenotype with 8803, 10,470, and 6850 non-frail individuals, respectively) and estimated sub-hazard ratios of regular prescription drug use (co-use, analgesic use, and sedative use), by frailty model. We addressed confounding with covariate adjustment and propensity score matching approaches. Results The baseline prevalence of analgesic and sedative co-use, analgesic use, and sedative use among non-frail respondents was 1.8%, 12.8%, and 4.7% for the frailty index model, 4.2%, 16.2%, and 5.3% for the functional domain model, and 4.3%, 15.4%, and 6.1% for the frailty phenotype model, respectively. Cumulative frailty incidence over 10 years was 39.3%, 36.1%, and 14.2% for frailty index, functional domain, and frailty phenotype models, respectively; covariate-adjusted sub-hazard ratio estimates were 2.00 (1.63-2.45), 1.83 (1.57-2.13), and 1.68 (1.21-2.33) for co-use; 1.72 (1.56-1.89), 1.38 (1.27-1.51), and 1.51 (1.27-1.79) for analgesic use; and 1.46 (1.24-1.72), 1.25 (1.07-1.46), and 1.31 (0.97-1.76) for sedative use. Frailty risk ranking (co-use > analgesic use > sedative use) persisted across all model sensitivity analyses. Discussion Consistently significant frailty risk estimates of regular prescription analgesic and sedative co-use and of prescription analgesic use support existing clinical, public health, and regulatory guidance on opioid and benzodiazepine co-prescription, on opioid prescription, and on NSAID prescription. Frailty phenotype measurement administration limited power to detect significant frailty risks. Research into specific pharmaceutical exposures and comparison of results across cohorts will be required to contribute to the deprescribing evidence base.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 387
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The association of race with frailty: The Cardiovascular Health Study
    Hirsch, Calvin
    Anderson, Melissa L.
    Newman, Anne
    Kop, Willem
    Jackson, Sharon
    Gottdiener, John
    Tracy, Russell
    Fried, Linda P.
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (07) : 545 - 553
  • [42] Frailty according to cardiovascular health study criteria
    Evenhuis, H.
    Hermans, H.
    Hilgenkamp, T.
    Bastiaanse, L.
    Echteld, M.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2012, 56 (7-8) : 661 - 661
  • [43] Frailty prevalence and associated factors in the Mexican health and aging study: A comparison of the frailty index and the phenotype
    Garcia-Pena, Carmen
    Avila-Funes, Jose Alberto
    Dent, Elsa
    Gutierrez-Robledo, Luis
    Perez-Zepeda, Mario
    EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY, 2016, 79 : 55 - 60
  • [44] Associations between loneliness and frailty among older adults: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study
    Sha Sha
    Yao Pan
    Yuebin Xu
    Lin Chen
    BMC Geriatrics, 22
  • [45] Association of frailty index with new-onset diabetes: from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)
    Zhang, Lisha
    Chu, Chao
    Zhang, Yan
    Wang, Man
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2025,
  • [46] The psychosocial impact of frailty among people with diabetes: findings from the Study of Health Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).
    O'Donovan, M. R.
    Sezgin, D.
    O'Caoimh, R.
    Liew, A.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (SUPPL 3) : 84 - 84
  • [47] Associations between loneliness and frailty among older adults: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study
    Sha, Sha
    Pan, Yao
    Xu, Yuebin
    Chen, Lin
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [48] COMPARISON OF FRAILTY MODELS IN THE AFRICAN AMERICAN HEALTH (AAH) COHORT
    Malmstrom, T. K.
    Miller, D. K.
    Morley, J. E.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 31 - 31
  • [49] The Frailty Instrument for primary care of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe predicts mortality similarly to a frailty index based on comprehensive geriatric assessment
    Romero-Ortuno, Roman
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 13 (02) : 497 - 504
  • [50] Retirement age and type as predictors of frailty: a retrospective cohort study of older businessmen
    Haapanen, Markus J.
    von Bonsdorff, Mikaela B.
    Perttila, Niko M.
    Tormakangas, Timo
    von Bonsdorff, Monika E.
    Strandberg, Arto Y.
    Strandberg, Timo E.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):