Frailty Risks of Prescription Analgesics and Sedatives across Frailty Models: the Health and Retirement Study

被引:2
|
作者
Bergen, Andrew W. [1 ]
Cil, Gulcan [1 ]
Sargent, Lana J. [2 ,3 ]
Dave, Chintan, V [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Res Inst, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Nursing, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Pharm, Geriatr Pharmacotherapy Program, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Pharmacoepidemiol & Treatment Sci, Inst Hlth Hlth Care Policy & Aging Res, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Rutgers State Univ, Ernest Mario Sch Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Adm, Piscataway, NJ USA
关键词
OLDER-ADULTS; PERSISTENT PAIN; POLYPHARMACY; PREDICTION; OPIOIDS;
D O I
10.1007/s40266-022-00941-2
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Introduction Limited evidence for incident frailty risks associated with prescription analgesics and sedatives in older (>= 65 years) community-living adults prompted a more comprehensive investigation. Methods We used data from older Health and Retirement Study respondents and three frailty models (frailty index, functional domain, frailty phenotype with 8803, 10,470, and 6850 non-frail individuals, respectively) and estimated sub-hazard ratios of regular prescription drug use (co-use, analgesic use, and sedative use), by frailty model. We addressed confounding with covariate adjustment and propensity score matching approaches. Results The baseline prevalence of analgesic and sedative co-use, analgesic use, and sedative use among non-frail respondents was 1.8%, 12.8%, and 4.7% for the frailty index model, 4.2%, 16.2%, and 5.3% for the functional domain model, and 4.3%, 15.4%, and 6.1% for the frailty phenotype model, respectively. Cumulative frailty incidence over 10 years was 39.3%, 36.1%, and 14.2% for frailty index, functional domain, and frailty phenotype models, respectively; covariate-adjusted sub-hazard ratio estimates were 2.00 (1.63-2.45), 1.83 (1.57-2.13), and 1.68 (1.21-2.33) for co-use; 1.72 (1.56-1.89), 1.38 (1.27-1.51), and 1.51 (1.27-1.79) for analgesic use; and 1.46 (1.24-1.72), 1.25 (1.07-1.46), and 1.31 (0.97-1.76) for sedative use. Frailty risk ranking (co-use > analgesic use > sedative use) persisted across all model sensitivity analyses. Discussion Consistently significant frailty risk estimates of regular prescription analgesic and sedative co-use and of prescription analgesic use support existing clinical, public health, and regulatory guidance on opioid and benzodiazepine co-prescription, on opioid prescription, and on NSAID prescription. Frailty phenotype measurement administration limited power to detect significant frailty risks. Research into specific pharmaceutical exposures and comparison of results across cohorts will be required to contribute to the deprescribing evidence base.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 387
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On asymptotic failure rates in bivariate frailty competing risks models
    Finkelstein, Maxim
    Esaulova, Veronica
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2008, 78 (10) : 1174 - 1180
  • [22] The association between continuing work after retirement and the incidence of frailty: evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study
    Sun, Linsu
    Deng, Guangrui
    Lu, Xi
    Xie, Xinlan
    Kang, Long
    Sun, Tao
    Dai, Xinhua
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2024, 28 (12):
  • [23] Using syndrome mining with the Health and Retirement Study to identify the deadliest and least deadly frailty syndromes
    Chao, Yi-Sheng
    Wu, Chao-Jung
    Wu, Hsing-Chien
    Hsu, Hui-Ting
    Tsao, Lien-Cheng
    Cheng, Yen-Po
    Lai, Yi-Chun
    Chen, Wei-Chih
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [24] Association of frailty index with incidence of chronic kidney disease: China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study
    Zhang, Lisha
    Zhang, Yan
    He, Yanru
    Deng, Fuxue
    Xue, Jiahong
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2025, : 681 - 688
  • [25] Using syndrome mining with the Health and Retirement Study to identify the deadliest and least deadly frailty syndromes
    Yi-Sheng Chao
    Chao-Jung Wu
    Hsing-Chien Wu
    Hui-Ting Hsu
    Lien-Cheng Tsao
    Yen-Po Cheng
    Yi-Chun Lai
    Wei-Chih Chen
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [26] Frailty Trajectories in Chinese Older Adults: Evidence From the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study
    Guo, Yanfei
    Ng, Nawi
    Hassler, Sven
    Wu, Fan
    Jonasson, Junmei Miao
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [27] DEPRESSION AND FRAILTY DEVELOPMENT AS CONCURRENT RISKS FOR ADVERSE HEALTH OUTCOMES
    Lohman, M.
    Mezuk, B.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2015, 55 : 177 - 178
  • [28] Frailty, Polypharmacy, and Health Outcomes in Older Adults: The Frailty and Dependence in Albacete Study
    Bonaga, Beatriz
    Sanchez-Jurado, Pedro M.
    Martinez-Reig, Marta
    Ariza, Gabriel
    Rodriguez-Manas, Leocadio
    Gnjidic, Danijela
    Salvador, Transito
    Abizanda, Pedro
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 19 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [29] The weight-adjusted waist index and frailty: A cohort study from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study
    Luo, Jinhua
    Deng, Hailian
    Wu, Yueying
    Zhang, Tuming
    Cai, Yuying
    Yang, Yu
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2024, 28 (09):
  • [30] Frailty prevalence and factors associated with the Frailty Phenotype and Frailty Index: Findings from the North West Adelaide Health Study
    Thompson, Mark Q.
    Theou, Olga
    Yu, Solomon
    Adams, Robert J.
    Tucker, Graeme R.
    Visvanathan, Renuka
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2018, 37 (02) : 120 - 126