Sensitivity of ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies in unselected pregnancies

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, WH
Levi, S
Alexander, S
Viart, P
Grandjean, H
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Ecole Sante Publ, Dept Polit & Syst Sante, Unite Sante Reprod & Epidemiol Perinatale, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Free Univ Brussels, Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Clin Cardiol Pediat & Congenitale, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Hop La Grave, INSERM, U558, Toulouse, France
来源
关键词
ultrasound; screening; prenatal diagnosis; congenital heart defect; bias;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the influence of heart defect frequency and severity on screening sensitivity of the entire spectrum of congenital anomalies (CA) and on detection rate of congenital heart defect (CHD) when performing routine ultrasound screening in unselected pregnant women. Study design: Secondary analysis was performed on data from Eurofetus, a large international collaborative study of ultrasound screening for CA in unselected populations. The present study addressed the relations (i) between the frequency of CHD in the screened population and the global sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting CA; (ii) between frequency of ventricular septum defect (VSD) and detection rate of CA and CHD; and (iii) between seriousness of CHD and CHD sensitivity. Results: A negative correlation (p<0.001) between CHD frequency and CA sensitivity was observed in this study. Likewise, a negative correlation was also found between frequency of VSD and sensitivity for CA or CHD detection (p<0.001). In addition, a positive significant relationship (p<0.001) was observed between sensitivity and severity of CHD. Conclusion: A low CHD frequency introduces bias in CA and CHD sensitivity evaluation. Incomplete assessment of fetal and neonatal malformations brings on systematic error, leading to the pre-eminence of severe defects in the studied population sample and artificially improving sensitivity figures. On the other hand, from a clinician's viewpoint, the higher sensitivity for severe defect is welcomed, since their detection is most crucial for appropriate management.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 580
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound screening for congenital uterine anomalies
    Jurkovic, D
    Gruboeck, K
    Tailor, A
    Nicolaides, KH
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (11): : 1320 - 1321
  • [2] PRENATAL ULTRASOUND SCREENING TO DIAGNOSE CONGENITAL ANOMALIES AMONG ONE THOUSAND UNSELECTED WOMEN AND THEIR PREGNANCY OUTCOME
    Biswas, Jhuma
    De, Kaushik
    Dasgupta, Shyamal
    Ghosh, Biswajit
    Sanyal, Poushali
    Mukherjee, Amitava
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2013, 2 (13): : 1966 - 1971
  • [3] Ultrasound screening for congenital pyelectasis in term pregnancies
    Ciardelli, V
    Rizzo, N
    Lanari, M
    Farina, A
    Magini, GM
    Paccaloni, B
    Rinaldi, L
    Cella, AVP
    Salvioli, G
    Bovicelli, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2005, 22 (05) : 265 - 267
  • [4] Pathologic ultrasound findings and risk for congenital anomalies in teenage pregnancies
    Eckmann-Scholz, Christel
    von Kaisenberg, Constantin S.
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    Jonat, Walter
    Rajabi-Wieckhorst, Atefeh
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (10): : 1950 - 1952
  • [5] Residual risk of noninvasive prenatal screening in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies
    Lu, Beiyi
    Yin, Lizhong
    Wang, Jing
    Yu, Bin
    Zhang, Bin
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 52 (01)
  • [6] Sensitivity of first-trimester ultrasound in the detection of congenital anomalies in twin pregnancies: population study and systematic review
    D'Antonio, Francesco
    Familiari, Alessandra
    Thilaganathan, Basky
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Manzoli, Lamberto
    Khalil, Asma
    Bhide, Amar
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (12) : 1359 - 1367
  • [7] SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF ROUTINE ANTENATAL SCREENING FOR CONGENITAL-ANOMALIES BY ULTRASOUND - THE BELGIAN MULTICENTRIC STUDY
    LEVI, S
    HYJAZI, Y
    SCHAAPS, JP
    DEFOORT, P
    COULON, R
    BUEKENS, P
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 1 (02) : 102 - 110
  • [8] Sensitivity of routine ultrasound screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus database
    Grandjena, H
    Larroque, D
    Levi, S
    ULTRASOUND SCREENING FOR FETAL ANOMALIES: IS IT WORTH IT?: SCREENING REVISITED AFTER THE EUROFETUS DATA, 1998, 847 : 118 - 124
  • [9] DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND IN PRENATAL SCREENING FOR CONGENITAL-ANOMALIES
    LAU, J
    FRIGOLETTO, F
    MCNEIL, BJ
    ZARIN, DA
    PAUKER, SG
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1984, 4 (04) : 545 - 545
  • [10] Routine ultrasound screening of congenital anomalies - An overview of the European experience
    Levi, S
    ULTRASOUND SCREENING FOR FETAL ANOMALIES: IS IT WORTH IT?: SCREENING REVISITED AFTER THE EUROFETUS DATA, 1998, 847 : 86 - 98