Sensitivity of ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies in unselected pregnancies

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, WH
Levi, S
Alexander, S
Viart, P
Grandjean, H
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Ecole Sante Publ, Dept Polit & Syst Sante, Unite Sante Reprod & Epidemiol Perinatale, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Free Univ Brussels, Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Clin Cardiol Pediat & Congenitale, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Hop La Grave, INSERM, U558, Toulouse, France
来源
关键词
ultrasound; screening; prenatal diagnosis; congenital heart defect; bias;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the influence of heart defect frequency and severity on screening sensitivity of the entire spectrum of congenital anomalies (CA) and on detection rate of congenital heart defect (CHD) when performing routine ultrasound screening in unselected pregnant women. Study design: Secondary analysis was performed on data from Eurofetus, a large international collaborative study of ultrasound screening for CA in unselected populations. The present study addressed the relations (i) between the frequency of CHD in the screened population and the global sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting CA; (ii) between frequency of ventricular septum defect (VSD) and detection rate of CA and CHD; and (iii) between seriousness of CHD and CHD sensitivity. Results: A negative correlation (p<0.001) between CHD frequency and CA sensitivity was observed in this study. Likewise, a negative correlation was also found between frequency of VSD and sensitivity for CA or CHD detection (p<0.001). In addition, a positive significant relationship (p<0.001) was observed between sensitivity and severity of CHD. Conclusion: A low CHD frequency introduces bias in CA and CHD sensitivity evaluation. Incomplete assessment of fetal and neonatal malformations brings on systematic error, leading to the pre-eminence of severe defects in the studied population sample and artificially improving sensitivity figures. On the other hand, from a clinician's viewpoint, the higher sensitivity for severe defect is welcomed, since their detection is most crucial for appropriate management.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 580
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ULTRASOUND SCREENING FOR FETAL STRUCTURAL ANOMALIES
    GOMEZ, KJ
    COPEL, JA
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 5 (02) : 204 - 210
  • [42] Comparing Induction of Labor With Expectant Management in Pregnancies With Congenital Anomalies
    Patel, Shruti
    Quimby, Alyssa
    Twogood, Sara
    Pinheiro, Meaghan
    Brown, Niquelle
    Cortessis, Victoria
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 127S - 127S
  • [43] INCIDENCE OF CONGENITAL-ANOMALIES IN PRE-MENOPAUSAL PREGNANCIES
    ICHINOE, K
    SHIINA, Y
    FUJIMOTO, S
    YOKOTA, H
    MATURITAS, 1984, 6 (02) : 133 - 134
  • [44] Ultrasound screening for fetal chromosome anomalies
    Drugan, A
    Johnson, MP
    Evans, MI
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2000, 90 (02): : 98 - 107
  • [45] Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening
    Woelfer, B
    Salim, R
    Banerjee, S
    Elson, J
    Regan, L
    Jurkovic, D
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (06): : 1099 - 1103
  • [46] Fetal MRI and ultrasound of congenital CNS anomalies
    Pogledic, I.
    Meyberg-Solomayer, G.
    Reith, W.
    RADIOLOGE, 2013, 53 (02): : 116 - 122
  • [47] MRI versus ultrasound in anorectal congenital anomalies
    Grosser, K
    Gobel, P
    Roesner, D
    EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMICS OF CLINICAL CARE AND RESEARCH IN SURGERY, 1997, SUPPL : 1327 - 1329
  • [48] SCREENING FOR THE COMPROMISED FETUS - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF UMBILICAL ARTERY VELOCIMETRY IN UNSELECTED PREGNANCIES
    WHITTLE, MJ
    HANRETTY, KP
    PRIMROSE, MH
    NEILSON, JP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 170 (02) : 555 - 559
  • [49] Rapid whole exome sequencing in pregnancies to identify the underlying genetic cause in fetuses with congenital anomalies detected by ultrasound imaging
    Deden, Chantal
    Neveling, Kornelia
    Zafeiropopoulou, Dimitra
    Gilissen, Christian
    Pfundt, Rolph
    Rinne, Tuula
    de Leeuw, Nicole
    Faas, Brigitte
    Gardeitchik, Thatjana
    Sallevelt, Suzanne C. E. H.
    Paulussen, Aimee
    Stevens, Servi J. C.
    Sikkel, Esther
    Elting, Mariet W.
    van Maarle, Merel C.
    Diderich, Karin E. M.
    Corsten-Janssen, Nicole
    Lichtenbelt, Klaske D.
    Lachmeijer, Guus
    Vissers, Lisenka E. L. M.
    Yntema, Helger G.
    Nelen, Marcel
    Feenstra, Ilse
    van Zelst-Stams, Wendy A. G.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2020, 40 (08) : 972 - 983
  • [50] ACCURACY OF ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSES IN PREGNANCIES COMPLICATED BY SUSPECTED FETAL ANOMALIES
    MANCHESTER, DK
    PRETORIUS, DH
    AVERY, C
    MANCOJOHNSON, ML
    WIGGINS, J
    MEIER, PR
    CLEWELL, WH
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1988, 8 (02) : 109 - 117