Comparison of Mizoribine and Mycophenolate Mofetil With a Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Retrospective Study in China

被引:10
|
作者
Shi, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Liu, H. [1 ]
Chen, X. -G. [1 ]
Shen, Z. -Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Chinese Peoples Armed Police Force, Inst Liver Transplantat, Beijing 100039, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin First Ctr Hosp, Organ Transplantat Ctr, Tianjin, Peoples R China
关键词
HIGH-DOSE MIZORIBINE; GASTROINTESTINAL COMPLICATIONS; ACID; ACTIVATION; REDUCTION; MECHANISM; EFFICACY; SAFETY; SODIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.10.018
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms as well as the efficacy and safety of mizoribine (MZR) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in Chinese living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Methods. Forty-two recipients enrolled between January 2012 and March 2014 were treated with either MZR (n = 22) or MMF (n = 20). All patients were treated in combination with a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen, besides the study drugs. Results. GI symptoms were observed in 1 of 22 patients (4.5%) and 10 of 20 patients (50%) in MZR treatment group and MMF treatment group, respectively (P =.001), during the post-transplantation 1 year. No significant differences in the incidence of acid reflux, bloated stomach feeling, and constipation were observed between the two groups. No recipient developed diarrhea in the MZR treatment group, whereas 30% of the MMF treatment group developed diarrhea (P =.007). The averages of GI symptom severity total score and diarrhea score were significantly lower in the MZR treatment group compare with MMF treatment group. There were no inter-group differences in background characteristics. There were no significant differences in acute rejection rate and clinical findings between these two groups, whereas the prevalence of cytomegalovirus infection and leukopenia were significantly lower in the MZR treatment group. There was no significant difference on adverse events such as hyperuricemia or other adverse events. Conclusions. This study demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of GI symptoms for treatment with MZR compared with MMF and good efficacy and safety in Chinese LDKT with MZR.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Mycophenolate Mofetil Dose Reduction on Allograft Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients on Tacrolimus-Based Regimens: A Systematic Review
    Su, Victoria C. H.
    Greanya, Erica D.
    Ensom, Mary H. H.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 45 (02) : 248 - 257
  • [22] Randomized Trial Comparing Tacrolimus and Steroid with Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil among HCV-Positive Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Takada, Yasutsugu
    Kaido, Toshimi
    Asonuma, Katsuhiro
    Sakurai, Hiroyuki
    Kubo, Shoji
    Kiuchi, Tetsuya
    Inomata, Yukihiro
    Isaji, Shuji
    Uemoto, Shinji
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 : S227 - S227
  • [23] Subclinical Lesions and Donor-Specific Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen Followed by Early Conversion to Sirolimus
    de Sandes-Freitas, Taina Veras
    Felipe, Claudia Rosso
    Campos, Erika Fernandes
    de Lima, Maria Gerbasi
    Soares, Maria Fernanda
    de Franco, Marcello Fabiano
    Aguiar, Wilson Ferreira
    Tedesco-Silva, Helio
    Medina-Pestana, Jose Osmar
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 99 (11) : 2372 - 2381
  • [24] Living-Donor Versus Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation: Comparison of Psychosocial Consequences for Recipients
    Gozdowska, J.
    Zatorski, M.
    Torchalla, P.
    Bialek, L.
    Bojanowska, A.
    Tomaszek, A.
    Serwanska-Swietek, M.
    Kieszek, R.
    Kwiatkowski, A.
    Chmura, A.
    Durlik, M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2016, 48 (05) : 1498 - 1505
  • [25] Regimen of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and low-dose steroid reduces acute rejection in kidney transplants
    Hoshinaga, K
    Aikawa, A
    Murai, M
    Yamamoto, H
    Hirayama, N
    Shishido, S
    Hasegawa, A
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (04) : 1762 - 1763
  • [26] New-Onset Diabetes After Transplantation: Comparison Between a Cyclosporine-Based and a Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen
    Zolota, A.
    Miserlis, G.
    Solonaki, F.
    Tranda, A.
    Antoniadis, N.
    Imvrios, G.
    Fouzas, I.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (10) : 3386 - 3391
  • [27] A prospective multicenter national study to assess the feasibility and benefits of steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant patients under a mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus-based regimen.
    Alarcon, A
    Del Castillo, D
    Gentil, MA
    Gomez, P
    Capdevilla, L
    Romero, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 224 - 224
  • [28] Thymoglobulin Induction in Liver Transplant Recipients with a Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Steroid Immunosuppressive Regimen: A Five-Year Randomized Prospective Study
    Boillot, Olivier
    Seket, Belhassen
    Dumortier, Jerome
    Pittau, Gabriella
    Boucaud, Catherine
    Bouffard, Yves
    Scoazec, Jean-Yves
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 15 (11) : 1426 - 1434
  • [29] Improved outcomes after ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation after 4 weeks of treatment with mycophenolate mofetil
    Mannami, M
    Mitsuhata, N
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (12) : 1756 - 1758
  • [30] Randomized trial of Sirolimus versus Mycophenolate mofetil in a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive protocol for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation:: 6-month results of a European multicentre trial
    Berney, T.
    Malaise, J.
    Morel, P.
    Group, Eurospk
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (09) : 1171 - 1171