Living-Donor Versus Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation: Comparison of Psychosocial Consequences for Recipients

被引:16
|
作者
Gozdowska, J. [1 ]
Zatorski, M. [2 ]
Torchalla, P. [1 ]
Bialek, L. [1 ]
Bojanowska, A. [2 ]
Tomaszek, A. [3 ]
Serwanska-Swietek, M. [3 ]
Kieszek, R. [3 ]
Kwiatkowski, A. [3 ]
Chmura, A. [3 ]
Durlik, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Transplantat Med Nephrol & Internal Dis, Nowogrodzka 59, PL-02006 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Social Sci & Humanities, Poznan, Poland
[3] Med Univ Warsaw, Clin Gen & Transplantat Surg, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS; RENAL-FUNCTION; SELF-EFFICACY; DISEASE; SATISFACTION; VALIDATION; DEPRESSION; ADHERENCE; LIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.01.075
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. Health benefits of a living-donor kidney transplantation are numerous and well known. There is, however, a dearth of knowledge on postoperative quality of life among the living-donor (LD) compared to deceased-donor (DD) transplant recipients. Materials and Methods. The study involved 89 patients after renal transplantation: 48 from LDs and 41 from DDs. Interview data indirectly indicated the patients' health, whereas physiological parameters directly pinpointed the patients' health and the graft function. All study participants completed questionnaires to measure quality of life and the specificity of emotional and cognitive functioning. Results. LD kidney recipients were younger than DD recipients (40 years vs. 49 years). LD and DD transplantation patients were similar in health status assessed by indirect methods (data from an interview) and direct methods (laboratory tests results). They, however, differed in their psychosocial functioning. LD patients had a greater sense of happiness (P < .01) and of self-efficacy (P = .07). Moreover, these patients were more actively involved in their social lives (P < .02) and were more satisfied with their social relationships (P = .07). LD recipients also had a higher quality of life in terms of mental functioning (P < .01) and satisfaction with their environments (P < .01). Additionally, there were significant correlations between quality of life and the quality of cognitive and emotional functioning in the group of LD recipients. The perceived impact of health on physical and professional activity and daily routines was similar in LD and DD groups. Conclusions. LD post-transplantation patients may derive greater psychosocial benefits from this form of treatment. This effect is not dependent on somatic parameters (comparable data from an interview and laboratory tests results). This study suggests that patients should be assisted by a multidisciplinary healthcare team, and receive continuous support from relatives during the post-transplantation adaptation process. This facilitates the patients' postoperative quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:1498 / 1505
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Living Non-relative Donor Versus Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation: a Comparison of Mental Health for Iranian Recipients
    Marjan Shamspour
    Elaheh Yazdanpanah
    Najmeh Shamspour
    Jalal Azmandian
    Fatemeh Yazdanpanah
    [J]. SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 5 (1)
  • [2] Simultaneous deceased-donor pancreas, living-donor kidney transplantation: single center experience
    Kim, YoungHoon
    Jung, Joo Hee
    Hong, Jung Ja
    Choi, Ji Yoon
    Kwon, Hyunwook
    Shin, Sung
    Han, Duck Jong
    [J]. XENOTRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 22 : S161 - S161
  • [3] SIMULTANEOUS DECEASED-DONOR PANCREAS, LIVING-DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Kim, YoungHoon
    Jung, Joo Hee
    Hong, Jung Ja
    Choi, Ji Yoon
    Kwon, Hyunwook
    Shin, Sung
    Han, Duck Jong
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 99 (11) : S265 - S265
  • [4] A comparison of rates and severity of chronic kidney disease in deceased-donor and living-donor liver transplant recipients: times matter
    Yankol, Yucel
    Bugeaud, Emily
    Zens, Tiffany
    Rizzari, Michael
    Mecit, Nesimi
    Leverson, Glen E.
    Foley, David
    Mezrich, Joshua D.
    Kanmaz, Turan
    Andacoglu, Oya M.
    D'Alessandro, Anthony M.
    Acarli, Koray S.
    Kalayoglu, Munci
    Fernandez, Luis A.
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 51 (02) : 610 - 622
  • [5] Living-donor or deceased-donor liver transplantation for hepatic carcinoma:A case-matched comparison
    Ping Wan
    Jian-Jun Zhang
    Qi-Gen Li
    Ning Xu
    Ming Zhang
    Xiao-Song Chen
    Long-Zhi Han
    Qiang Xia
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (15) : 4393 - 4400
  • [6] Living-donor or deceased-donor liver transplantation for hepatic carcinoma: A case-matched comparison
    Wan, Ping
    Zhang, Jian-Jun
    Li, Qi-Gen
    Xu, Ning
    Zhang, Ming
    Chen, Xiao-Song
    Han, Long-Zhi
    Xia, Qiang
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (15) : 4393 - 4400
  • [7] Comparing Emotional Adjustment of Living-donor and Deceased-donor Kidney Transplant Patients
    Lai, Yousheng Lester
    Neo, Hui Ling Michelle
    Vathsala, Anantharaman
    Griva, Konstadina
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT, 2020, 6 (02): : E529
  • [8] Acute cellular rejection rates in living-donor and deceased-donor liver transplantation
    Perkins, JD
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 12 (05) : 886 - 887
  • [9] Living-donor vs deceased-donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Nobuhisa Akamatsu
    Yasuhiko Sugawara
    Norihiro Kokudo
    [J]. World Journal of Hepatology, 2014, (09) : 626 - 631
  • [10] Living-donor vs deceased-donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Akamatsu, Nobuhisa
    Sugawara, Yasuhiko
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 6 (09) : 626 - 631