Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Waste Management in City of Karaj, Iran

被引:0
|
作者
Amiri, Leila [1 ]
Ramezanianpour, Mohammad [2 ]
Farahani, Mohammadreza [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Environm Engn Fac, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Wollongong, Civil & Environm Engn, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[3] Univ KN Toosi, Civil & Environm Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
MCDA; AHP; Waste Management Strategy;
D O I
10.3850/978-981-08-5716-5_T298
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to compare various waste management strategies in City of Karaj (Iran) and to select the best one by a decision-making method. According to existing problems such as no Source Separation and Dirty Compost, best strategy selection based on the Multi Criteria Analysis is essential. In particular, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a mathematical technique for multi-criteria decision making is used in this paper. This article compares three waste management strategies that include various practices (Source Separation, Mechanical and Biological Treatment (MBT), Refused Derived Fuel (RDF), Incineratiiin, Anaerobic Digestion and Landfilling). These strategies are compared using the environmental, social and economical criteria. Eight considered criteria and strategies are weighted based on the AHP method to select the best one. The results show that the second strategy provides the best solution for waste management which includes Source Separation, Compost production, MBT, RDF and Landfilling. Furthermore, this paper suggests various solution that minimize environmental impacts, social cost and improve public acceptance.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 477
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Praveen Thokala
    Guruprasad Madhavan
    [J]. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 16
  • [42] Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis
    Durbach, Ian N.
    Stewart, Theodor J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [43] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
    Zlaugotne, Beate
    Zihare, Lauma
    Balode, Lauma
    Kalnbalkite, Antra
    Khabdullin, Aset
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 454 - 471
  • [44] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Didenko, Vladimir
    Gritsyuk, Sergey
    Sullivan, Terry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (03) : 467 - 489
  • [45] Modeling the context in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Labreuche, Christophe
    [J]. NEW DIMENSIONS IN FUZZY LOGIC AND RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 303 - 310
  • [46] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Thokala, Praveen
    Madhavan, Guruprasad
    [J]. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2018, 16
  • [47] Biases and Debiasing in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Montibeller, Gilberto
    von Winterfeldt, Detlof
    [J]. 2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, : 1218 - 1226
  • [48] Framework for multi-criteria decision management in watershed restoration
    Udias, Angel
    Galbiati, Lorenzo
    Javier Elorza, Francisco
    Efremov, Roman
    Pons, Jordi
    Borras, Gabriel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2012, 14 (02) : 395 - 411
  • [49] Multi-criteria decision methods for financial management in SMEs
    Dos, Anna
    [J]. MANAGING AND MODELLING OF FINANCIAL RISKS, 8TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, PTS I & II, 2016, : 170 - 178
  • [50] Multi-criteria decision aid in the electrical energy management
    Bewszko, Tadeusz
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRICAL POWER ENGINEERING (ELEKTROENERGETIKA 2013), 2013, : 129 - 132