A pro-poor growth strategy to end hunger

被引:4
|
作者
Senauer, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Food Ind Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-8276.00344
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Over 800 million people in the world are chronically undernourished and food insecure and some 1.2 billion live on the equivalent of less than one U.S. dollar per day (Food and Agricultural Organization, World Bank 2001). Those persistently hungry do not get enough to eat on a daily basis to lead active, healthy lives. They are hungry predominantly because they are poor and cannot afford enough food to eat adequately. Hunger affects not just their nutritional status but also the overall quality of their lives. Their lives are shorter and filled with more suffering. Malnutrition is a factor in the deaths of over half of the 12 million children under the age of five who die each year (United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)). Although clearly a great challenge, substantially reducing, and even ending hunger, is an achievable goal. Ending hunger would not mean that no person would ever go hungry again; rather, it would mean the elimination of chronic mass hunger. There is an emerging consensus concerning the major elements of such an anti-poverty strategy. They include a focus on investing in people in terms of their major asset, the human capital they possess, by enhancing the education, skills, health, and nutrition of the poor. Particular attention would be given to improving the education and health of children, and ensuring equity in access for girls, as well as enhancing the overall status of women. Agricultural development plays a crucial role in a pro-poor growth strategy. Carefully designed and implemented intervention programs can accelerate the reduction of chronic poverty and hunger and also serve as safety nets for transitory hardship.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 831
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strategies for pro-poor growth: Pro-poor, pro-growth or both?
    Page, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ECONOMIES, 2006, 15 (04) : 510 - 542
  • [2] The operationalization of the pro-poor growth strategy in Cameroon
    Tong, Chantal Marie Ngo
    [J]. REVUE INTERVENTIONS ECONOMIQUES-PAPERS IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 56
  • [3] Measuring pro-poor growth
    Ravallion, M
    Chen, SH
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 78 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [4] A note on pro-poor growth
    Son, HH
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2004, 82 (03) : 307 - 314
  • [5] THE MAKING OF PRO-POOR GROWTH
    Carmignani, Fabrizio
    [J]. SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2011, 58 (05) : 656 - 684
  • [6] In Search of a Strategy for Making Growth More Pro-Poor in the Philippines
    Fuwa, Nobuhiko
    Balisacan, Arsenio M.
    Bresciani, Fabrizio
    [J]. ASIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2015, 14 (01) : 202 - 226
  • [7] On pro-poor growth and the measurement of convergence
    Nissanov, Zoya
    Silber, Jacques
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2009, 105 (03) : 270 - 272
  • [8] Is economic growth pro-poor in Niger?
    Daouda, Youssoufou Hamadou
    [J]. AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-REVUE AFRICAINE DE DEVELOPPEMENT, 2013, 25 (02): : 203 - 214
  • [9] Consistent comparison of pro-poor growth
    Buhong Zheng
    [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2011, 37 : 61 - 79
  • [10] Global estimates of pro-poor growth
    Son, Hyun H.
    Kakwani, Nanak
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 36 (06) : 1048 - 1066