A pro-poor growth strategy to end hunger

被引:4
|
作者
Senauer, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Food Ind Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-8276.00344
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Over 800 million people in the world are chronically undernourished and food insecure and some 1.2 billion live on the equivalent of less than one U.S. dollar per day (Food and Agricultural Organization, World Bank 2001). Those persistently hungry do not get enough to eat on a daily basis to lead active, healthy lives. They are hungry predominantly because they are poor and cannot afford enough food to eat adequately. Hunger affects not just their nutritional status but also the overall quality of their lives. Their lives are shorter and filled with more suffering. Malnutrition is a factor in the deaths of over half of the 12 million children under the age of five who die each year (United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)). Although clearly a great challenge, substantially reducing, and even ending hunger, is an achievable goal. Ending hunger would not mean that no person would ever go hungry again; rather, it would mean the elimination of chronic mass hunger. There is an emerging consensus concerning the major elements of such an anti-poverty strategy. They include a focus on investing in people in terms of their major asset, the human capital they possess, by enhancing the education, skills, health, and nutrition of the poor. Particular attention would be given to improving the education and health of children, and ensuring equity in access for girls, as well as enhancing the overall status of women. Agricultural development plays a crucial role in a pro-poor growth strategy. Carefully designed and implemented intervention programs can accelerate the reduction of chronic poverty and hunger and also serve as safety nets for transitory hardship.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 831
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Korea's pro-poor economic growth
    Kakwani, N
    Son, HH
    [J]. MODERNIZING THE KOREAN WELFARE STATE: TOWARDS THE PORDUCTIVE WELFARE MODEL, 2004, : 109 - 132
  • [22] Relative income change and pro-poor growth
    Kosny, Marek
    Yalonetzky, Gaston
    [J]. ECONOMIA POLITICA, 2015, 32 (03) : 311 - 327
  • [23] A policy agenda for pro-poor agricultural growth
    Dorward, A
    Kydd, J
    Morrison, J
    Urey, I
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 32 (01) : 73 - 89
  • [24] On distributional change, pro-poor growth and convergence
    Shatakshee Dhongde
    Jacques Silber
    [J]. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2016, 14 : 249 - 267
  • [25] Reflections on the Role of Agriculture in Pro-Poor Growth
    Valdes, Alberto
    Foster, William
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 38 (10) : 1362 - 1374
  • [28] What is “Pro-Poor”?
    Jean-Yves Duclos
    [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2009, 32 : 37 - 58
  • [29] What is "Pro-Poor"?
    Duclos, Jean-Yves
    [J]. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2009, 32 (01) : 37 - 58
  • [30] Dominance testing for ‘pro-poor’ growth with an application to European growth
    Daniel Sotelsek-Salem
    Ismael Ahamdanech-Zarco
    John A. Bishop
    [J]. Empirical Economics, 2012, 43 : 723 - 739